Short-Term Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass (MIDCAB) Procedure.

Objectives: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) is an alternative for revascularisation of the isolated left anterior descending (LAD) artery or as a multi-vessel (MV) procedure for the diagonal branch (RD) or the left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) region. Methods: From 2021 to 2022, 91 patients underwent MIDCAB or multi-vessel MIDCAB procedures in our heart center. The left internal mammary artery (LIMA) was anastomosed to the left anterior descending artery via the left minithoracotomy approach in all patients. Results: Of the patients, a total of 86.8% were male. Eighty percent of the patients had two- or three-vessel coronary artery disease. The mean age was 65.1 ± 10.1 years. The mean operation time was 2.6 ± 0.8 h. The 30-day mortality was 0. The mean required packed red blood cells (pRBC) was 0.4 ± 1.2 unit. The mean intensive care unit stay (ICU) was 1.5 ± 1.6 days. The mean follow-up time was 1.5 ± 0.5 years. One patient received percutaneous coronary intervention due to de novo stenosis of the RCA. Late mortality was 2.2%. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 98.8% at 1 and 2 years. Conclusions: The postoperative complication rate of our MIDCAB cohort is low, and the short-term survival is favorable. Our postoperative and short-term clinical results demonstrate that this procedure is safe and feasible.

Comparison of Two Surgical Approaches for Coronary Artery Bypass of Left Anterior Descending Artery.

Background/Objectives: The minimally invasive approach through left mini-thoracotomy is a promising alternative to the median sternotomy for coronary artery bypass. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) with off-pump coronary artery bypass through sternotomy (OPCAB) for single-vessel disease. Methods: From January 2017 to February 2023, 377 consecutive patients aged above 18 years undergoing off-pump bypass of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) with left internal thoracic artery underwent OPCAB. Propensity score matching was then applied. Primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality. Results: Prior to matching, 30-day mortality occurred in 2 (0.7%) patients in the MIDCAB group vs. 1 (1%) patient in the OPCAP group (p = 1). Transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) was required in 9.4% and 29% of patients within the MIDCAB and the OPCAB groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Median intensive care stay (ICU) was 1 [1-2] day in the MIDCAB group, vs. 2 [1-3] in the OPCAB (p < 0.001). In the matched cohort, 10% of MIDCAB patients received RBCs vs. 27.5% of OPCAB patients (p = 0.006). Median ICU stay was significantly lower in the MIDCAB group, 1 [1-2] vs. 2 [1-3] days. Conclusions: MIDCAB is as safe and effective as OPCAB for single coronary artery bypass of the LAD with the LITA in select patients. It is associated with a decreased ICU stay and lower transfusion rates when compared with OPCAB.

Right minithoracotomy and resternotomy approach in patients undergoing a redo mitral valve procedure.

OBJECTIVES: A minimally invasive approach via a thoracotomy is an alternative in challenging redo cardiac procedures. Our goal was to present our early postoperative experience with minimally invasive cardiac surgery via a right minithoracotomy (minimally invasive) and resternotomy in patients undergoing a mitral valve procedure as a reoperation. METHODS: From 2017 until 2020, reoperation of the mitral valve was performed through a right-sided minithoracotomy in 27 patients and via a resternotomy in 26 patients. Patients with femoral vessels suitable for cannulation underwent a minimally invasive technique. Patients requiring concomitant procedures regarding the aortic valve were operated on via a resternotomy. RESULTS: The mean age was 66 ± 12 years in the minimally invasive group and 65 ± 12 years in the whole cohort. The average Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 11 ± 10% in the minimally invasive group and 13 ± 9% in all patients. The majority of the patients underwent reoperation because of severe mitral valve insufficiency (48% and 55%, respectively). The mean time to reoperation was 7 ± 9 years (minimally invasive group). The 30-day mortality was 4% in the minimally invasive group and 11% in the whole cohort. The blood loss was 566 ± 359 ml in the minimally invasive group and 793 ± 410 ml totally. There were no postoperative neurological complications in the minimally invasive group and 1 (2%) in the whole cohort. Postoperative echocardiography revealed competent mitral valve/prosthesis function in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: A minimally invasive approach for a mitral valve reoperation in selected patients is a safe alternative to resternotomy with a low transfusion requirement. Both surgical techniques are associated with good postoperative outcomes.

A novel approach for quantification of the future unmet medical need in right ventricular dysfunction.

Although 'unmet medical need' (UMN) is an increasingly used term in the healthcare sector instrumental to the approximate value of drug discovery projects relevant to portfolio management, no standardized approach exists for its quantification. Especially in diseases with different comorbidities, high patient heterogeneity, and incomplete epidemiological data, it is difficult to judge the need for new therapies. The approach presented here combines an expert assessment of key UMN indicators related to the individual patient with a literature search to collect epidemiological data describing the corresponding patient population with its underlying heterogeneity. This assessment supports decision-making within the portfolio management process in larger research and development organizations.

Cardiac metastasis causes paradoxical malignant embolism.

BACKGROUND: Embolic events play an important role in clinical everyday practice. Malignant arterial embolism is a rare nevertheless often fatal entity for cardiac, cerebral or systemic ischemia, requiring immediate diagnosis and treatment. CASE: This is a case report of a 65 years-old female, suffering from pulmonal adenocarcinoma, who was hospitalized due to neurological deficits caused by an acute ischemic stroke, followed by anterior myocardial infarction within 3 days. Diagnostic work-up revealed metastasis of the pulmonal adenocarcinoma in the right atrium and a patent foramen ovale. Histopathological examination of the coronary embolus verified paradoxical arterial embolism of the pulmonal adenocarcinoma into a coronary vessel and consequently cerebral arteries. CONCLUSION: The present case underlines the need for (i), consideration of malignant embolism, (ii) histopathological examination of the embolus to determine its etiology, and (iii) interdisciplinary discussion of individual therapeutic and prevention strategies in cancer patients with cerebral, cardiac or systemic embolic events.

Postoperative results of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass procedure in 234 patients.

Introduction: Minimally invasive approach in cardiac surgery has gained popularity. In order to reduce surgical trauma in coronary surgery minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) has already been established. This technique has been introduced for revascularisation of isolated left anterior descending (LAD). It can also be performed for hybrid revascularisation procedure in multi-vessel disease. Methods: From 2017 to 2021, 234 patients received MIDCAB operation in our heartcenter 73% were male. Most of the patients had two or three vessel disease (74%). The average age of the patients was 66 ± 12 years mean. The left internal mammary artery (LIMA) was anastomosed to the LAD through left minithoracotomy approach. Multi-vessel MIDCAB (MV-MIDCAB) including two anastomoses (T-graft to LIMA with additional saphenous vein graft) was done in 15% (n = 35). Results: The average operation time was 2.3 ± 0.8 h mean. The 30-day mortality was 1.7% (n = 4). The average amount of packed red blood cells (pRBC) that was given intra- and postoperatively was 0.4 ± 0.8 units mean. The mean intensive care unit stay (ICU) was 1 ± 1.2 days. Three patients (1.3%) had wound infection postoperatively. The rate of neurologic complications was 0.4% (n = 1). Two patients (0.9%) had myocardial infarction and received coronary re-angiography perioperatively including stent implantation of the right coronary artery. Discussion: The MIDCAB procedure is a safe and less traumatic procedure for selected patients with proximal LAD lesions. It is also an option for hybrid procedure in multi-vessel disease. The ICU stay and application of pRBC's are low. Our MIDCAB results show a good postoperative clinical outcome. However, follow-up data are necessary to evaluate long-term outcome.

Longer-term outcomes after bicuspid aortic valve repair in 142 patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the longer-term results of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair with or without aortic root replacement. METHODS: From 1999 to 2017, 142 patients with or without aortic root dilatation who underwent repair of a regurgitant BAV were included in the study. Ninety-four patients underwent isolated BAV repair (Group 1; median age 43 years) and 48 patients underwent valve-sparing aortic root replacement plus BAV repair (aortic valve reimplantation-Group 2; median age 48 years). Median clinical follow-up time was 5.9 years (range 0.5-15) in Group 1 and 3 years (range 0.5-16) in Group 2, respectively. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 1% in Group 1, and 2% in Group 2 (p = .6). The 5- and 10-year survival was 93 ± 2.9% and 81 ± 5.8% in Group 1 and 96 ± 3.1% and 96 ± 3.1% in Group 2, respectively (p = .31). Eleven patients of Group 1 (1.7%/patient-year) and five patients of Group 2 (2.2%/patient-year) underwent reoperation of the aortic valve (p = .5). The 5- and 10-year freedom from reoperation were 93.0 ± 2.1% and 77.1 ± 7.1% in Group 1 and 93.0 ± 5.0% and 76.7 ± 9.6% in Group 2 (p = .83), respectively. At the latest follow-up, only two patients of Group 1 and 1 patient of Group 2 had AV regurgitation = 2° (p = .7). The cumulative linearized incidence of all valve-related complications (bleeding, stroke, endocarditis, and reoperation) was 2.9%/patient-year in Group 1% and 4%/patient-year in Group 2, respectively (p = .6). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated BAV repair and combined aortic valve reimplantation plus BAV repair provide good clinical longer-term outcomes with relatively low reoperation rate and durable valve function.

First Experiences with MANTA Vascular Closure Device in Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery.

BACKGROUND: To more minimize the minimally invasive valve surgeries, percutaneous vascular access and closure has been used for the establishment of extracorporeal circulation. This study investigates early clinical outcomes of patients who received MANTA for femoral artery closure as first experiences in minimally invasive valve surgery. METHODS: Between January 2019 and July 2019, 103 consecutive patients (mean age: 58 ± 11 years) underwent video-assisted minimally invasive valve surgery through right anterior minithoracotomy at two cardiac surgery referral centers in Germany. Percutaneous cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass and femoral artery closure with MANTA were performed in all patients: 18-F and 14-F MANTA were used in 88 (85.4%) and 15 (14.6%) patient, respectively. Mitral, aortic, tricuspid, and double valve surgeries were performed in 51 (49.5%), 39 (37.9%), 7 (6.8%), and 6 (5.8%), patients, respectively. Clinical data were prospectively entered into our institutional database. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass time and cross-clamping time were 69 ± 23 and 38 ± 14 minutes, respectively. Except for two patients with late pseudoaneurysm on 15th and 23th postoperative day, neither major nor minor vascular complications nor vascular closure device failure according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definition criteria was observed. Additionally, no wound healing disorders or conversion to surgical closure was observed. CONCLUSIONS: MANTA as percutaneous femoral artery closure after decannulation of cardiopulmonary bypass is a safe, feasible, and effective approach and yields excellent early outcomes. Larger size studies are needed to evaluate more the efficacy and safety of MANTA.

Outcome of surgery for acute infective endocarditis: does preoperative stroke have an impact on mortality?

PURPOSE: Surgical therapy of infective endocarditis (IE) is challenging and can be associated with high mortality. In this study, we present the early outcomes of patients who underwent cardiac surgery for IE. METHODS: From 2017 until 2019, 66 patients underwent surgical treatment for IE. Staphylococcus aureus infection was identified in 14 patients (21%). In the same period, about 813 valve replacement procedures were performed with 8% incidence of IE. Mean age was 66 ± 12 years and 32% were females. Mean ejection fraction was 55 ± 9%. Seven patients (11%) had stroke due to septic embolism preoperatively. In 20 patients (30%), prosthetic valve endocarditis was an indication for reoperation. Thirty-day postoperative mortality and impact of preoperative stroke were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 17% (n = 11). Mean EuroSCORE I was 28 ± 22%. Mean cross clamp time was 63 ± 37 min. Fourty patients (61%) underwent one-valve procedure, 25 patients (38%) had double-valve, and one (1%) triple-valve operation. All seven patients with preoperative neurologic dysfunction had unremarkable postoperative course without death or neurologic deterioration. Five of them had no worsening in neurological status, while 2 patients had slight improvement in speech. The comparison between the two groups (patients without preoperative neurological vs. patients with preoperative neurological dysfunction) revealed no significance in the postoperative mortality rate (18% vs. 0% with p = 0.26). Postoperative echocardiography revealed competent valve function in all cases. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment for IE still remains a challenge with high morbidity and mortality. Patients with preoperative neurologic dysfunction due to septic embolism have good early postoperative results without increased mortality.

Right mini-thoracotomy approach in patients undergoing redo mitral valve procedure.

AIM: A minimally invasive technique is an attractive option in cardiac surgery. In this study, we present our experience with minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) via right mini-thoracotomy on patients undergoing mitral valve procedure as reoperation. METHODS: From 2017 until 2019, 20 patients underwent reoperation of the mitral valve through a right-sided mini-thoracotomy. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established through cannulation of the femoral vessels. All patients requiring isolated re-operative mitral valve surgery with suitable femoral vessels for cannulation were included in the study. Patients requiring concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or with peripheral artery disease were excluded. RESULTS: The mean age was 65 ± 12 years. The average log. EuroSCORE was 9 ± 5%. Ten patients with severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR) underwent re-repair of the mitral valve. Seven of them were post mitral valve repair (MVR), one was post aortic valve replacement (AVR), one had tricuspid valve repair, and one other patient had CABG before. Ten patients underwent mitral valve replacement due to mixed mitral valve disease (n = 9) or mitral valve endocarditis (n = 1). Eight patients were post MVR and 2 had AVR before. The mean time to reoperation was 7.5 ± 8 years. In-hospital mortality was 5% (n = 1). The mean cross clamp time was 54 ± 26 min. Postoperative echocardiography revealed competent valve function in all cases with mean ejection fraction of 55 ± 9%. The Kaplan-Meier 1- and 2-year survival was 95%. CONCLUSION: The MICS approach for mitral valve reoperation in selected patients seems to be safe and feasible. It is also a surgical option for high-risk patients.

Aortic Valve Repair for Aortic Insufficiency or Dilatation: Technical Evolution and Long-term Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve repair (AVR) is an attractive alternative to valve replacement for the treatment of aortic valve insufficiency. Here we report on the midterm outcomes after AVR for aortic valve insufficiency with an emphasis on durability of repair. METHODS: Between 1996 and 2017, 560 consecutive patients (mean age, 57 ± 16 years) underwent various AVR procedures on tricuspid (n = 415, 74%) and bicuspid (n = 145, 26%) aortic valves. In 313 patients (56%) the David procedure was performed, whereas in 247 patients (44%) cusp repair without aortic root procedure was conducted. Concomitant procedures were coronary artery bypass grafting in 82 patients (15%) and mitral valve repair in 47 patients (8%). Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was complete in 97% of patients. Mean follow-up was 6.3 ± 4.6 years. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 1.4% (n = 8). Late mortality was observed in 132 patients with cardiovascular events accounting for mortality in 13 patients: Survival at 10 years was 70%. Reoperation on the aortic valve was performed on 39 patients for recurrent insufficiency, isolated in 25, or combined with valve stenosis in 5 patients; endocarditis accounted for reoperation in 9 patients (0.2% per patient-year). Freedom from reoperation was 88% at 10 years. Cumulative linearized incidence of all valve-related complications was 2% per patient per year. CONCLUSIONS: AVR for insufficiency is a durable procedure with low valve-related morbidity and mortality in the midterm.

Efficacy and safety of transvenous lead extraction in 108 consecutive patients: a single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVES: The number of cardiac implantable electronic devices is growing worldwide because they play a relevant role in improving the survival rate in patients with specific heart diseases. Cardiac implantable electronic devices complications including infection, dysfunction or venous stenosis increase the need for the least traumatic way to explant leads. Our goal was to report the successes and procedural complication rates of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) in a consecutive series of patients. METHODS: From 2010 to 2016, 108 patients underwent TLE of 227 leads due to endocarditis (n = 21; 19%), pocket infection (n = 58; 54%) or lead dysfunction (n = 29; 27%). In 98% (n = 106) of the patients, laser-assisted lead extraction was performed. In 2% (n = 2) of the patients, the application of a solitary locking stylet was sufficient. The patient mean age was 68 ± 14 years; 25% of the patients had previous cardiac surgery. TLE was performed a mean of 9 ± 6 years after the implantation of the existing device. RESULTS: Complete procedural success (removal of all lead material from the vascular space) was achieved in 98.7% (n = 224), and clinical success (achievement of all clinical goals associated with the indication for lead removal and absence of major complications) was achieved in 98% (n = 106). In 2 patients the procedure failed due to a vascular tear requiring a thoracotomy. In 1 patient, complete lead extraction was not possible due to heavy calcification (coronary-sinus lead). The 30-day mortality rate was 3.7% (n = 4); the patients died of multiorgan failure (n = 1), cardiac failure (n = 1) and septicaemia (n = 2). The procedure-related major complication rate was 2% (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted TLE seems to be a safe and effective procedure with an acceptable complication rate.

Mid-Term Clinical Outcome of Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Valvulotomized Vein Grafts.

BACKGROUND: The lower patency rate of vein grafts (VG) in comparison to arterial grafts may be related to vein valves, which favor turbulences and thrombosis that lead to graft failure. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of patients with valvulotomized VG after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedure. METHODS: From 2007 to 2014, 233 patients with a mean age of 67 ± 9 years had CABG or combined CABG and valve procedures. Valvulotomized saphenous VG and arterial grafts were used. Clinical follow-up and outcome were evaluated after 6.3 ± 2 years. The graft patency was rated with multislice computed tomography in 57 patients and coronary angiography in 29 patients 3.1 ± 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Overall, 168 patients had segregated CABG surgery, and 65 patients received additional procedures, with mean 2.7 ± 1 arterial and 1.5 ± 0.7 venous anastomoses. The 30-day-mortality in isolated CABG patients was 2%. Survival at five years was 80%. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) free rate at five years was 80%. At the last follow up (mean 6.3 years), 94% of the patients were in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class 0. The quote of patent valvulotomized VG was 96.1% compared to a patency rate of 96.7% for the arterial grafts in the subgroup undergoing angiography or computed tomography of the heart. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate good mid-term results of graft patency, and comparable clinical results in patients undergoing CABG with valvulotomized VG. A longer follow-up period and a higher number of bypass graft imaging examinations are necessary to affirm our results.

Propensity-matched comparison between minimally invasive and conventional sternotomy in aortic valve resuspension.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare the results of David procedure through conventional or minimally invasive approach. METHODS: A propensity-matched comparison in patients undergoing a minimally invasive (partial upper sternotomy, n = 103) or complete sternotomy (n = 103) David procedure from 1991 to 2016 was performed. Patients were 57 ± 14 years old on average in both groups. The David technique was modified by generating a neosinus (P < 0.01) in 99 (96%) patients (minimally invasive group) and in 42 (41%) patients (complete sternotomy group), respectively. The average follow-up time was 3 ± 2 years (minimally invasive group) and 8 ± 4 years (complete sternotomy group). RESULTS: There was only 1 in-hospital death (in the full sternotomy group, P = 0.5). The applied quantity of packed red blood cells (pRBC) was significantly higher in the complete sternotomy group (3.4 ± 4 vs 1 ± 0.5, P < 0.01). There were no late deaths in the minimally invasive group but 14 died during a longer follow-up period in the full sternotomy group (P < 0.01). Freedom from reoperation or aortic valve insufficiency ≥2° was 95% vs 93% (minimally invasive versus complete sternotomy group) at 5 years and 95% vs 79% at 10 years (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive aortic valve reimplantation procedure for selected patients with aortic root aneurysm and aortic valve incompetence is a durable procedure with minor valve-related morbidity and mortality at the mid-term follow-up. The intra- and perioperative application of pRBC was significantly lower in the minimally invasive group. However, comparison of long-term follow-up data in both groups is necessary to evaluate valve function.

Midterm Results of a Minimally Invasive Approach in David Procedure.

BACKGROUND: The David procedure is a well-known technique in selected patients with aortic root pathology. A minimally invasive approach in heart surgery increases open interest. METHODS: From 1991 to 2015, the David technique was performed in 296 patients in our unit. In 90 cases, operations were performed through partial upper sternotomy. The patient mean age was 57 ± 14 years in the minimally invasive group (n = 90) and 58 ± 14 years in the complete sternotomy group (n = 206; p = 0.2). The neosinus modification was performed in 80 patients (89%) in the minimally invasive group and in 79 patients (38%) in the complete sternotomy group (p < 0.01). Mean follow-up was 3 ± 2 years in the minimally invasive group and 8 ± 4 years in the complete sternotomy group. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was zero in the minimally invasive group and was 3% (n = 6) in the complete sternotomy group (p = 0.1). The need for packed red blood cells was significantly lower in the minimally invasive group (1.6 ± 3 U) than in the complete sternotomy group (3.7 ± 6 U; p < 0.01). Thirty late deaths (2% per patient-year) were observed in the complete sternotomy group versus zero in the minimally invasive group (p < 0.01). One patient (0.5% per patient-year) in the minimally invasive group and 12 patients (0.8% per patient-year) in the complete sternotomy group required reoperation in the follow-up period (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive David technique for patients with ascending aortic aneurysm and aortic valve insufficiency offers a good solution with low perioperative blood transfusion rate. Our midterm results show low valve-related complications and reoperation rate. However, long-term follow-up of the minimally invasive group is necessary.

Minimally invasive aortic arch surgery: Early and late outcomes.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed our experience with the aortic arch operations performed through a minimally invasive approach, with emphasis on safety and feasibility, early and late outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 71 adult patients with aortic arch aneurysm (58, 82%), dissection (10, 14%) or porcelain aorta (3, 4%) who underwent primary arch surgery through a partial upper sternotomy. RESULTS: The aortic arch was replaced partially in 45 (63%), or totally in 26 (37%) patients. The repair was further extended with the elephant trunk procedure, conventional in 8 (11.3%) or frozen in 15 (21.1%) patients. No conversion to full sternotomy was needed. New permanent renal failure occurred in 1 (1.4%), temporary neurologic deficit in 2 (2.8%) and permanent neurologic deficit in 3 (4.2%) patients. Early mortality was observed in 4 (5.6%) patients. Actuarial survival was 79.2 ± 8.3% at 4 years and cumulative reoperation-free survival was 76.4 ± 9.4% at 4 years. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive aortic arch surgery is safe and feasible. Early outcomes are at the lower range compared to other published series. Late outcomes are not adversely influenced, as the desired extent of aortic resection can be achieved, producing a durable aortic repair.

Triple valve surgery through a less invasive approach: early and mid-term results.

OBJECTIVES: A partial upper sternotomy has become established as a less invasive approach mainly for single and double valve surgery. This report evaluates the clinical outcomes of triple valve surgery performed through a partial upper sternotomy. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 37 consecutive patients (28 men, 76%) who underwent triple valve surgery through a partial upper sternotomy between 2005 and 2015. The patients' mean age was 67 ± 17 years; 27 (73%) were in New York Heart Association Class III or IV. Aortic and mitral valve insufficiency was more common than stenosis. Ninety-three percent of surviving patients were followed for a mean period of 58 ± 24 months. RESULTS: Aortic valve procedures consisted of 24 (65%) replacements and 13 (35%) repairs. The mitral valve was repaired in 28 (76%) patients, whereas tricuspid valve repair was feasible in all patients. No conversion to full sternotomy was necessary. Myocardial infarction was not observed. Chest tube drainage was 330 ± 190 ml, and 4 patients required reopening for bleeding (1, 3%) or tamponade (3, 8%). One stroke was observed due to heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia after initial unremarkable neurological recovery. Early mortality included 5 (13.5%) patients. Actuarial survival at 5 years was 52 ± 10%. CONCLUSIONS: A partial upper sternotomy provides adequate exposure to all heart valves. We did not experience technical limitations with this approach. Wound dehiscence, postoperative bleeding, intensive care unit and hospital stay and early deaths were low compared to data from other published series of triple valve surgery through a full median sternotomy. Early and mid-term outcomes were not adversely affected by this less invasive approach.

Long-Term Results Following Pericardial Patch Augmentation for Incompetent Bicuspid Aortic Valves: A Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Many techniques for repair of bicuspid aortic valves have been described and long-term results differ considerably. The current study evaluates our institutional results using the pericardial patch augmentation technique with the aim of increasing coaptation height. METHODS: From November 2002 through April 2015, 103 consecutive patients underwent aortic valve repair using pericardial patch augmentation for incompetent bicuspid aortic valve. Of them 26 were referred with an aortic valve regurgitation grade 1+ or 2+ and were excluded from the current report. The remaining 77 patients with a mean age of 42 ± 14 years and aortic valve regurgitation grade of 3+ or higher were included in this retrospective single-center study. The main step of operative technique is the partial correction of leaflet prolapse by leaflet plication and overcorrection of coaptation height augmenting the fused leaflet with an autologous pericardial patch. In 45 patients (58%) an isolated aortic valve repair was performed. The ascending aorta was dilated in 32 cases (42%), and the following procedures were used for correction: reduction aortoplasty (19 patients), the David procedure (11 patients), and ascending aortic replacement (2 patients). Long-term results were evaluated by echocardiography and standardized questionnaire. Mean follow-up was 4.9 ± 4.6 years. RESULTS: There was no perioperative or 90-day mortality. Survival at 5 and 10 years was 96.1% and 93.5%, respectively. Freedom from reoperation at 5 and 10 years was 94.8% and 93.5%, respectively. At the latest echocardiographic follow-up, 94% of patients had none to trivial aortic regurgitation and 6% showed aortic regurgitation greater than or equal to 2°. Mean aortic gradients were 12.6 ± 9 mm Hg. One patients developed endocarditis 1 year after the procedure. There were no perioperative or long-term major neurologic events. CONCLUSIONS: The pericardial patch augmentation technique provides reliable long-term competence of reconstructed bicuspid aortic valves and results in a low reoperation rate, with other valve related complications being rare.

Can Perioperative Right Ventricular Support Prevent Postoperative Right Heart Failure in Patients With Biventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation?

OBJECTIVES: Depending on the pre-existing condition of the right ventricle (RV), left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation may have a detrimental effect on RV function, subsequently leading to right heart failure. This study details the authors' experience with perioperative mechanical RV support in patients with biventricular impairment but primarily scheduled for isolated LVAD implantation. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Two center study, university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: This study included LVAD recipients with preoperative biventricular impairment who received an additional right ventricular assist device (RVAD) after a failed weaning attempt from cardiopulmonary bypass due to acute RV failure. INTERVENTIONS: Outcomes of 25 patients who underwent LVAD and unplanned temporary RVAD implantation were analyzed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All patients experienced significant preoperative RV impairment (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion: 10.2±26.3 mm; right atrium pressure: 17.9±10.4 mmHg) and pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery pressure: 54.8±25.7 mmHg). In 15 patients, additional tricuspid valve annuloplasty was performed. Mean duration of temporary RVAD support was 11.1±7.2 days. In 23 patients (92%), the RVAD was removed successfully. None of the patients developed RV failure after RVAD removal. Hospital survival and the 1-year survival rate of the study group were 68% and 56%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of perioperative RVAD support in LVAD recipients with biventricular dysfunction are encouraging. Temporary RVAD support allows an already compromised RV to become attuned to the hemodynamic conditions after LVAD implantation. This strategy provides patients with preoperative impaired RV function a high likelihood to permanently undergo LVAD support only.