In vivo influence of nicotine on human basal and NSAID-induced gut barrier function.

BACKGROUND: Smoking reduces the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced small intestinal permeability increase in healthy people. It also affects inflammatory bowel disease that is associated with a disturbed gut barrier function. To assess the role of nicotine on barrier function, its influence on basal and NSAID-induced intestinal permeability was studied in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Thirty-one healthy non-smoker subjects performed permeability tests with 51Cr-EDTA and sugar markers (sucrose, lactulose, mannitol, sucralose) before and during 2 weeks of nicotine patch application, and with and without indomethacin intake, respectively. Since smoking has been described as affecting motility, transit measurements were also done with the sodium[13C]-octanoate and lactose-[13C]-ureide breath tests before and during nicotine exposure. Correlations between permeability markers were checked and the influence of gastrointestinal transit was assessed. RESULTS: Nicotine did not affect barrier function in vivo, nor gastric emptying, small-bowel transit time or orocaecal transit. 51Cr-EDTA and lactulose correlated in basal 0-6 h permeability testing (r = 0.529, P < 0.0001), as did 6-24 h excretion of 51Cr-EDTA and sucralose (r = 0.474, P < 0.001); 97% and 90% of the subjects had a permeability increase after indomethacin intake for 0-6 h and 6-24 h excretion of Cr-EDTA, respectively. This population proportion is 63% for lactulose/mannitol and 83% for sucralose. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term exposure to nicotine does not alter normal basal or NSAID-induced gut barrier function or transit. 51Cr-EDTA and the respective sugar markers correlate well in in vivo permeability testing in healthy humans. The radioactive test detects more NSAID-induced permeability increase than does the lactulose/mannitol ratio permeability test.

Comparative study of ASCA (Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody) assays in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody (ASCA) is a serologic marker associated with Crohn's disease (CD). Although there is still discussion on its clinical value, several companies each promote their own ASCA assay to be used in the gastroenterologist's practice at considerable expense. The aim of this study was to determine whether different ASCA assays agree sufficiently well for the results to be used interchangeably. METHODS: Blood obtained from a large cohort of IBD patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD; 100 with CD, 100 with ulcerative colitis [UC]) and 178 controls (100 healthy blood donors and 78 patients with non-IBD diarrheal illnesses) was studied with 4 different ASCA assays. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were compared. Agreement between assays was evaluated. RESULTS: Sensitivity of ASCA for CD ranged between 41% and 76%. Sensitivity was inversely related to specificity and positive predictive value. Results correlated well overall (range = 0.54-0.90) and the different ROC curves showed good agreement. When recalculated cutoff points were used, interchangeability increased. However, large differences were seen when absolute values were compared. CONCLUSIONS: A large range in sensitivities and specificities of ASCA for CD is seen with different ASCA assays, mainly as a consequence of the cutoff value chosen for each individual assay. Although agreement between and within assays is good, caution is important when absolute values are used. Standardization of ASCA measurements is greatly needed.

The effects of smoking and indomethacin on small intestinal permeability.

BACKGROUND: Smoking modulates inflammatory bowel disease, protecting from ulcerative colitis on the one hand and worsening the course of Crohn's disease on the other. This influence might occur through changes in intestinal permeability, because permeability is increased in most patients with Crohn's disease. AIM: To study the influence of smoking on small intestinal permeability and its increase induced by indomethacin. METHODS: 50 smokers and 50 nonsmokers underwent a 51Cr-EDTA basal permeability test and the same test after challenge with indomethacin 125 mg p.o. RESULTS: Small intestinal permeability was the same in smokers (median 1.22%; IQR 1.00-1.58) and nonsmokers (1.24%; 0.94-1.66). Basal small intestinal permeability was lower in females (1.09%; 0.87-1.33) than in males (1.48%; 1.18-1.88). Indomethacin challenge increased permeability by 110% (71-141) in smokers, vs. 156% (78-220) in the nonsmokers (P=0.04). CONCLUSION: Smoking reduces the effect of NSAID on small intestinal permeability. It is therefore unlikely that the adverse effect of smoking on Crohn's disease is related to its influence on intestinal permeability.