Seizure-related complication rate in a residential population with epilepsy and intellectual disability (ECOMRAID-trial).

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the ECOMRAID trial (Epileptic seizure related Complication RAte in residential population of persons with epilepsy and Intellectual Disability) was to study seizure-related complications (status epilepticus, respiratory complications, or other severe complications) in people with epilepsy and intellectual disability living in a residential setting. The results of the present study are a prerequisite for performing a prospective study into the effectiveness of nocturnal surveillance patients with high risk for Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in three general residential care institutions and one residential specialized epilepsy clinic. In this 5-year cohort, we collected the following data: age (at inclusion and in case of death), sex, type of residential care, different types of complications, rescue/emergency medication administration, transfers to another department (internal midcare / monitoring unit or general hospital) and a self-designed SUDEP risk score. Our primary research questions were to assess the number of patients who experienced seizure-related complications and their individual complication rates. The secondary research questions were to document the relationship of these complications with the SUDEP risk score, with the type of residential living, and with the frequency of interventions by caregivers. RESULTS: We included 370 patients (1790 patient-years) and in 135 of them, we found 717 seizure-related complications. The following complication rates were found: all complications: at 36%, status epilepticus: at 13%, respiratory complications: at 5%, and other complications at 26%. In residential care institutions, we found fewer patients with complications compared to the specialized epilepsy clinic (all complications 24% vs 42%, OR 0.44, p < 0.01; status epilepticus 5% vs 17%, OR 0.27, p < 0.01; other: complications 19% vs 30%, OR 0.56, p < 0.05). In residential care institutions, we found more "other complications" than in the specialized epilepsy clinic (89% vs 71%, OR 3.13, p < 0.0001). The annual frequency of all complications together was higher in residential care institutions (range 0 to 21 vs 0 to 10, p < 0.05). Rescue medication was given to 75% of the patients, but more often in the specialized epilepsy clinic (median 2.6 vs 0.5 times/patient/year, p < 0.001). In the specialized epilepsy clinic, more patients were transferred to a midcare / monitoring unit or general hospital (56% vs 9%, OR 13.44, p < 0.0001) with higher yearly frequencies (median 0.2 vs 0.0, p < 0.001). There were no reported cases of SUDEP. The median SUDEP risk score was higher in the specialized epilepsy clinic (5 vs 4, p < 0.05) and was weakly correlated with the status epilepticus (ρ = 0.20, p < 0.001) and (total) complication rate (ρ = 0.18, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We found seizure-related complications in more than one-third of the patients with epilepsy and intellectual disability living in a residential setting over a period of 5 years. The data also quantify seizure-related complications in patients with epilepsy and intellectual disability.

The ictal bradycardia syndrome.

The ictal bradycardia syndrome is an uncommon diagnosis in which bradycardia is accompanied by simultaneous epileptic discharges in the EEG. We describe a patient who was referred to the emergency ward because of syncope. Ictal semeiology and EEG-EG findings are discussed and compared with those published in the literature. Therapeutic options are discussed in relation with those published in the literature. The ictal bradycardia syndrome is probably underdiagnosed, while its recognition is of utmost importance because of potential life threatening complications such as asystole. Up to now, its aetiology is poorly understood, its ictal semeiology is often described insufficiently and its therapy is still discussed.

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy patients: Risk factors. A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Several risk factors for sudden unexplained death in epilepsy patients (SUDEP) have been proposed, but subsequent work has yielded conflicting data. The relative importance of various risk factors for SUDEP was never explored. The aim of this study is to review systematically risk factors for SUDEP and also to determine their relevance for SUDEP by calculating relative risk factor ratios. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Authors performed a literature-search on "SUDEP" in Medline, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE. Studies with unknown number of SUDEP cases or with less than five SUDEP cases and reviews were excluded from further analysis. The value of each paper was assessed, based on the quality of the study and the reliability of the diagnosis of SUDEP. This value ranged from 1 (low quality) to 10 (high quality). Papers with a value below 7 were eliminated for further analysis. For each analysed factor, a risk factor ratio was determined, with a higher ratio for a stronger risk factor. RESULTS: A number of strong risk factors for SUDEP: young age, early onset of seizures, the presence of generalized tonic clonic seizures, male sex and being in bed. Weak risk factors for SUDEP: prone position, one or more subtherapeutic bloodlevels, being in the bedroom, a strucural brain lesion and sleeping. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, authors have designed a quality scale to select papers. The relative importance of risk factors for SUDEP is demonstrated.