Prevalence of dementia in a southern European population in two different time periods: the ZARADEMP Project.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of dementia in two different time periods and two different studies. METHOD: Representative, random samples of the elderly (>65 years) in the Zaragoza Study or ZARADEMP-0 (n = 1080) completed the previous decade, and now in Wave I of the ZARADEMP Project or ZARADEMP-I (n = 3715) were interviewed. Standardized measures included the Geriatric Mental State and the History and Aetiology schedule. Cases of dementia were diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria. RESULTS: Adjusted, global prevalence of dementia has not varied significantly: it was 5.2% (95% CI = 3.9-6.6) in ZARADEMP-0 and 3.9% (95% CI = 3.3-4.5) in ZARADEMP-I (prevalence ratio = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.56-1.02). However, the prevalence in ZARADEMP-I was significantly lower among men, particularly in all age groups between 70 and 84 years. CONCLUSION: Stability of the global prevalence of dementia in the elderly population has been documented. However, the decreased prevalence found in elderly men stimulated environmental hypotheses.

Intoxicación por GHB: A propósito de dos casos / Intoxication by gamma-hydroxibutiric acid: two cases

Se presentan dos casos de intoxicación por GHB o 'éxtasis líquido'. La frecuencia de esta intoxicación ha aumentado mucho en nuestro medio. Los clínicos deberían conocer su existencia y sus efectos adversos (AU)

[Revalidation and standardization of the cognition mini-exam (first Spanish version of the Mini-Mental Status Examination) in the general geriatric population]. / Revalidación y normalización del Mini-Examen Cognoscitivo (primera versión en castellano del Mini-Mental Status Examination) en la población general geriátrica.

BACKGROUND: The revalidation of the Mini Examen Cognoscitivo (MEC), first Spanish version (1978) of the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) and documentation of "population-based norms" should clarify the potential confusion induced by later versions of MMSE. CONTEXT: The Zaragoza Study on the prevalence of dementia and depression in a representative sample of the elderly community (N = 1,080). INSTRUMENTS: MEC-35 and MEC-30 points, and validated, Spanish versions of Geriatric Mental State (GMS), History and Aetiology Schedule (HAS) and Social Status Schedule (SSS). PROCEDURE: a) validation of MEC (standardized lay interviewers) against the gold standard of psychiatric diagnosis (DSM-III-R), two months later; b) "population-based norms" in the "healthy" population, and c) comparison with other MMSE versions. RESULTS: The instrument fulfills criteria of "feasibility", "content", "procedural" and "construct validity". Test-retest reliability: weighted kappa = 0.637. MEC-30 (cut-off point 23/24), sensitivity = 89.8%, specificity = 75.1% (80.8% with the cut-off at 22/23), and ROC curve, AUC = 0.920. The coefficients of individual items were satisfactory and the specificity increases in MEC-35 (83.9%). Other MMSE Spanish versions have not improved these coefficients. "Population-based norms" confirm the hypothesized influence of age and education level. MEC-30 is the version with most comparable results with the MMSE in USA. CONCLUSIONS: The validity of MEC is confirmed in the elderly population, with the same cut-off points recommended in the original standardization. MEC-30 is the best version for international comparisons.