Causes of late transplant failure in cyclosporine-treated kidney allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: There is little information about very long-term outcomes of kidney allograft recipients exposed to calcineurin inhibitors. METHODS: In this single-centre retrospective study with 20-year follow-up, we analyzed data from 644 patients who underwent primary renal transplantation between 1983 and 1993. Participants were treated with a cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive scheme and had allograft function at 1 year. RESULTS: After 20 years, 15.2% patients died, 39.7% experienced allograft loss, 26.8% were alive with a functioning transplant, and 18.2% were lost to follow-up. Cardiovascular disease (30.8%), malignancy (26.6%) and infection (17.0%) were the main causes of death. Age, new-onset proteinuria > 1 g/day, major acute cardiovascular event (MACE), and malignancy were independent predictors of mortality at time-dependent multivariate analysis. Chronic rejection (63.3%), recurrent glomerulonephritis (14.0%), and nonspecific interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (13.2%) were the leading cause of allograft loss. Basal disease, hepatitis C, difference between 1 year and nadir serum creatinine, new-onset proteinuria > 1 g/day, and MACE were independent predictors of transplant failure. Among patients with 20-year allograft function, we recorded the following complications: hypertension (85%), malignancy (13%), diabetes (9%), and cardiovascular disease (9%). Median serum creatinine and proteinuria were 1.4 mg/dL and 0.6 g/day, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged use of cyclosporine may expose to several dose-related adverse events and may contribute to the development of allograft dysfunction but it does not necessarily cause relentless, progressive transplant failure if patients are carefully and consistently monitored during the follow-up.

Outcomes of Pregnancies After Kidney Transplantation: Lessons Learned From CKD. A Comparison of Transplanted, Nontransplanted Chronic Kidney Disease Patients and Low-Risk Pregnancies: A Multicenter Nationwide Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation (KT) may restore fertility in chronic kidney disease (CKD). The reasons why maternofetal outcomes are still inferior to the overall population are only partially known. Comparison with the CKD population may offer some useful insights for management and counselling.Aim of this study was to analyse the outcomes of pregnancy after KT, compared with a large population of nontransplanted CKD patients and with low-risk control pregnancies, observed in Italy the new millennium. METHODS: We selected 121 live-born singletons after KT (Italian study group of kidney in pregnancy, national coverage about 75%), 610 live-born singletons in CKD, and 1418 low-risk controls recruited in 2 large Italian Units in the same period (2000-2014). The following outcomes were considered: maternal and fetal death; malformations; preterm delivery; small for gestational age (SGA) baby; need for the neonatal intensive care unit; doubling of serum creatinine or increase in CKD stage. Data were analyzed according to kidney diseases, renal function (staging according to CKD-epidemiology collaboration), hypertension, maternal age, parity, ethnicity. RESULTS: Maternofetal outcomes are less favourable in CKD and KT as compared with the low-risk population. CKD stage and hypertension are important determinants of results. Kidney transplantation patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate greater than 90 have worse outcomes compared with CKD stage 1 patients; the differences level off when only CKD patients affected by glomerulonephritis or systemic diseases ("progressive CKD") are compared with KT. In the multivariate analysis, risk for preterm and early-preterm delivery was linked to CKD stage (2-5 vs 1: relative risk 3.42 and 3.78) and hypertension (RR 3.68 and 3.16) while no difference was associated with being a KT or a CKD patient. CONCLUSIONS: The maternofetal outcomes in patients with kidney transplantation are comparable with those of nontransplanted CKD patients with similar levels of kidney function impairment and progressive and/or immunologic kidney disease.

Pregnancy outcomes after kidney graft in Italy: are the changes over time the result of different therapies or of different policies? A nationwide survey (1978-2013).

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice to restore fertility to women on renal replacement therapy. Over time, immunosuppressive, support therapies and approaches towards high-risk pregnancies have changed. The aim of this study was to analyse maternal-foetal outcomes in two cohorts of transplanted women who delivered a live-born baby in Italy in 1978-2013, dichotomized into delivery before and after January 2000. METHODS: A survey involving all the Italian transplant centres was carried out, gathering data on all pregnancies recorded since the start of activity at each centre; the estimated nationwide coverage was 75%. Data on cause of ESRD, dialysis, living/cadaveric transplantation, drug therapy, comorbidity, and the main maternal-foetal outcomes were recorded and reviewed. Data were compared with a low-risk cohort of pregnancies from two large Italian centres (2000-14; Torino and Cagliari Observational Study cohort). RESULTS: The database consists of 222 pregnancies with live-born babies after transplantation (83 before 2000 and 139 in 2000-13; 68 and 121 with baseline and birth data, respectively), and 1418 low-risk controls. The age of the patients significantly increased over time (1978-99: age 30.7 ± 3.7 versus 34.1 ± 3.7 in 2000-13; P < 0.001). Azathioprine, steroids and cyclosporine A were the main drugs employed in the first time period, while tacrolimus emerged in the second. The prevalence of early preterm babies increased from 13.4% in the first to 27.1% in the second period (P = 0.049), while late-preterm babies non-significantly decreased (38.8 versus 33.1%), thus leaving the prevalence of all preterm babies almost unchanged (52.2 and 60.2%; P = 0.372). Babies below the 5th percentile decreased over time (22.2 versus 9.6%; P = 0.036). In spite of high prematurity rates, no neonatal deaths occurred after 2000. The results in kidney transplant patients are significantly different from controls both considering all cases [preterm delivery: 57.3 versus 6.3%; early preterm: 22.2 versus 0.9%; small for gestational age (SGA): 14 versus 4.5%; P < 0.001] and considering only transplant patients with normal kidney function [preterm delivery: 35 versus 6.3%; early preterm: 10 versus 0.9%; SGA: 23.7 versus 4.5% (P < 0.001); risks increase across CKD stages]. Kidney function remained stable in most of the patients up to 6 months after delivery. Multiple regression analysis performed on the transplant cohort highlights a higher risk of preterm delivery in later CKD stages, an increase in preterm delivery and a decrease in SGA across periods. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy after transplantation has a higher risk of adverse outcomes compared with the general population. Over time, the incidence of SGA babies decreased while the incidence of 'early preterm' babies increased. Although acknowledging the differences in therapy (cyclosporine versus tacrolimus) and in maternal age (significantly increased), the decrease in SGA and the increase in prematurity may be explained by an obstetric policy favouring earlier delivery against the risk of foetal growth restriction.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with ciclosporin-A in renal transplantation: 7-year observational results.

The European Tacrolimus versus Ciclosporin-A Microemulsion (CsA-ME) Renal Transplantation Study demonstrated that tacrolimus decreased acute rejection rates at 6 months. Primary endpoints of this investigator-initiated, observational 7-year follow-up study were acute rejection rates, patient and graft survival rates, and a composite endpoint (BPAR, graft loss, and patient death). We analyzed data from the original intent-to-treat population (n = 557; 286 tacrolimus, 271 CsA-ME). A total of 237 tacrolimus and 208 CsA-ME patients provided data. At 7 years, Kaplan-Meier estimated rates of patients free from BPAR were 77.1% in the tacrolimus arm and 59.9% in the CsA-ME arm, graft survival rates amounted to 82.6% and 80.6%, and patient survival rates to 89.9% and 88.1%. Estimated combined endpoint-free survival rates were 60.2% in the tacrolimus arm and 47.0% in the CsA-ME arm (P = <0.0001). A higher number of patients from the CsA-ME arm crossed over to tacrolimus during 7 year follow-up: 19.7% vs. 7.9% (P = <0.002). More patients in the tacrolimus group stopped steroids and received immunosuppressive monotherapy. Significantly, more CsA-ME patients received lipid-lowering medication and experienced cosmetic and cardiovascular adverse events. Tacrolimus-treated renal transplant recipients had significantly higher combined endpoint-free survival rates mainly driven by lower acute rejection rates despite less immunosuppressive medication at 7 years.

The impact of recurrence of primary glomerulonephritis on renal allograft outcome.

Twenty-yr patient and death-censored graft survival of 348 kidney transplant recipients with primary glomerulonephritis (GN) and of 696 matched controls were 82.2% in GN patients and 75% in controls (p = 0.037) and 49.5% and 54%, respectively (p = 0.013). GN patients had a higher incidence of graft failure than controls even considering death as a competing risk (p = 0.004). In the GN group, graft survival of deceased and of living donor recipients was similar. At multivariate analysis, GN as primary disease (RR: 1.47), delayed graft function recovery (RR: 2.34), acute rejection (RR: 2.36), and any PRA positivity (RR: 1.01) were predictive of graft loss. GN recurred in 85 of 348 grafts (24.4%), and 43 were lost for recurrence. In non-recurrent patients, graft survival at 20 yr was significantly better than in recurrent patients (59.4% vs. 24.4%, p = 0.000), but not different from that of controls (59.4 vs. 54%, p = 0.9). At multivariate analysis, young age at transplantation (RR: 0.97), shorter duration of dialysis (RR: 1.05 per each dialysis year), and graft from living donors (RR: 1.668) were independent predictors of recurrence. Patients with primary GN have reduced graft survival in comparison with controls, and this is mainly due to recurrence of original disease. However, the most frequent recurrence in living recipients does not compromise graft survival.

The long-term outcome of renal transplantation of IgA nephropathy and the impact of recurrence on graft survival.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on allograft survival at 15 years, the impact and the predictors of recurrence of the original disease in renal transplanted patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN). METHODS: In this retrospective study, we compared the long-term outcome of renal transplant in 190 patients with IgAN with that of 380 non-diabetic controls and evaluated the impact of recurrence of IgAN on the graft outcome. RESULTS: At 15 years, the patient survival was 88.3% in IgAN patients and 82.6% in controls (P = 0.12), while the death-censored graft survival was 62.6 and 72.4%, respectively (P = 0.038). IgAN had a higher cumulative incidence of graft failures in comparison with controls even considering death as a competing risk (P = 0.025). At multivariate analysis, IgAN [relative risk (RR) = 1.468, P = 0.026], delayed graft function recovery (RR = 2.394, P = 0.000) and acute rejection (RR = 2.51, P = 0.000) were predictive of graft loss. IgAN recurred in 42 grafts (22.1%), of them, 12 were lost for recurrence and in another 6 recurrence was considered a concomitant cause of graft loss. The 15-year death censored graft survival was 68.3% in non-recurrent and 51.2% in recurrent patients (P = 0.069). Pure graft survival of non-recurrent IgAN patients was similar to that of controls (P = 0.406). At Cox analysis, the recurrence of IgAN significantly reduced from 1981 to 2010 (P = 0.0065, RR = 0.936). CONCLUSIONS: IgAN emerged as an independent predictor of worse graft outcome in the long-term. Recurrence of IgAN seems to progressively reduce in transplants performed from 1981 to 2010.

Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type I in renal transplantation patients: a single-center study of a cohort of 68 renal transplants followed up for 11 years.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the long-term outcome of renal transplant patients with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) type I and the impact of recurrence. METHODS: The outcomes of 68 renal transplants performed between 1976 and 2009 in 63 patients with MPGN were compared with those of 136 controls matched for time of transplantation, sex, age, and source of donors. RESULTS: The mean posttransplant follow-up was 131.3±83.8 months for patients with MPGN and 139.21±88.7 months for controls. At 15 years, patient survival rates were 76.2% in patients with MPGN and 78.8% in controls (P=ns), whereas pure graft survival rates were 68% in MPGN and 67.9% in controls (P=ns). MPGN recurred in 16 patients (23.5%) 44±30.3 months after transplant (range, 3.5-105 months). Of recurrent grafts, nine were lost for recurrence within 116.5±51.36 months, three patients died with functioning kidney, the other 4 grafts are functioning 156.7±47.5 months after transplantation. Graft survival at 15 years was 73.5% in nonrecurrent and 40.4% in recurrent patients (P=0.02). Patients with recurrence were younger at diagnosis of MPGN (17.64±5.02 years vs. 22.9±9.6 years; P=0.037) and had low C3 more frequently than nonrecurrent patients (75% vs. 28.8%; P=0.01). Proteinuria was higher in recurrent patients who lost the graft in comparison with those with functioning graft (7.14±4.05 vs. 2.86±1.95; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term patient and graft survival were similar in patients with MPGN and in controls. Recurrence occurred in one-fourth of patients and caused graft loss in 56%. Younger age at diagnosis of MPGN and low C3 during transplantation seems to be predictive of recurrence.

Long-term outcome of renal transplantation in patients with idiopathic membranous glomerulonephritis (MN).

BACKGROUND: Little information is available about the long-term outcome of renal transplanted patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (MN). METHODS: The outcomes of 35 first renal transplants performed between 1975 and 2008 in patients with MN were compared with those of 70 controls transplanted in the same period and matched for sex, age and source of donors. RESULTS: The mean post-transplant follow-up was 117 ± 86 months for MN patients and 123 ± 83 months for controls. At 15 years, patient survival was 96% in patients with MN and 88% in the controls (P = ns), while graft survival rates were respectively 40% and 69% (P = 0.06). MN recurred in 12 patients (34%), namely in 4/8 (50%) patients who received the kidney from related living donors and in 8/27 (29.6%) who received the kidney from a deceased donor. Recurrence led to graft failure in six patients, all deceased donor kidney recipients, within 54 ± 33 months. The other six grafts are functioning 134 ± 73 months after transplantation. Patients with recurrence were more frequently females (42% vs 4.3%, P = 0.02). The recurrence occurred earlier (4.8 ± 3.0 vs 45.6 ± 46.9 months, P = 0.05), and there was a trend to develop a higher proteinuria (7.1 ± 5.5 vs 3.67 ± 2.6 g/24 h, P = 0.1) in grafts eventually lost because of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term patient survival was similar in renal transplant recipients with MN and in controls. The graft survival was lower in MN patients than in controls, although the difference was at borderline significance. Recurrence occurred in one-third of the patients and caused graft loss in half of them.

Long-term outcome of renal transplantation in adults with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.

SUMMARY: Little information is available about the long-term results of kidney transplantation in adults with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). The outcomes of 52 renal transplants performed between 1988 and 2008 in 47 adults with FSGS were compared with those of 104 matched controls (median follow-up 93.4 vs. 109.4 months respectively). At 15 years, patient survival was 100% and graft survival 56% in FSGS patients vs. 88.3% and 64% respectively in controls (P = NS). FSGS recurred in 12 out of 52 grafts (23%) and led to graft failure in seven within 10 months (median). In the other five cases, proteinuria remitted and grafts are functioning 106 months (median) after transplantation. A second recurrence developed in five out of eight re-transplanted patients (62.5%) who lost their first graft because of recurrence; only one graft was lost. Patients with recurrence were more frequently male subjects (83% vs. 40%, P = 0.02), younger at diagnosis of FSGS (16.3 +/- 6.8 vs. 24.1 +/- 11.5 years, P = 0.03) and of younger age at transplantation (28.4 +/- 7.8 vs. 35.8 +/- 12.2 years, P = 0.05). Treatment with plasmapheresis plus ACE inhibitors achieved either complete or partial remission in 80% of the cases. Long-term patient and renal allograft survivals of adults with FSGS were comparable to those of controls. Recurrence was more frequent in young patients and in patients who lost a previous graft from recurrence. Graft loss resulting from a second recurrence is lower than expected.

Renal transplantation in adults with Henoch-Schonlein purpura: long-term outcome.

BACKGROUND: Little information is available about the long-term outcome of renal transplantation in adults with Henoch-Schonlein purpura (HSP). METHODS: We compared the outcomes of 17 patients with HSP who received 19 renal transplants with those of 38 controls matched for time of transplantation, age, gender and source of donor. The mean post-transplant follow-up was 109 +/- 99 months for HSP patients and 110 +/- 78 months for controls. RESULTS: The actuarial 15-year patient survival was 80% in HSP patients and 82% in controls, and the death-censored graft survival was 64% in HSP patients and in controls. The risks of acute rejection, chronic graft dysfunction, arterial hypertension and infection were not different between the two groups. In eight grafts (42%) recurrence of HSP nephritis was found (0.05/patient/year). In spite of therapy, one patient died and four eventually restarted dialysis respectively 10, 32, 35 and 143 months after renal transplant. Seventy-one percent of grafts transplanted in patients with necrotizing/crescentic glomerulonephritis of the native kidney had HSP recurrence in comparison to 12% of recurrences in patients with mesangial nephritis (P = 0.05) CONCLUSIONS: Long-term patient and allograft survival of HSP patients was good. However, 42% of HSP patients, particularly those with necrotizing/crescentic glomerulonephritis of the native kidneys, developed a recurrence of HSP nephritis that eventually caused the loss of the graft function in half of them.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with ciclosporin A in renal transplantation: three-year observational results.

BACKGROUND: The European tacrolimus versus ciclosporin A microemulsion (CsA-ME) renal transplantation study showed that tacrolimus was significantly more effective in preventing acute rejection and had a superior cardiovascular risk profile at 6 months. METHODS: The endpoints of this investigator-initiated, observational, 36-month follow-up were acute rejection incidence rates, rates of patient and graft survival and renal function. An additional analysis was performed using the combined endpoints BPAR, graft loss and patient death. Data available from the original ITT population (557 patients; 286 tacrolimus and 271 CsA-ME) were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 231 tacrolimus and 217 CsA-ME patients participated. At 36 months, Kaplan-Meier-estimated BPAR-free survival rates were 78.8% in the tacrolimus group and 60.6% in the CsA-ME group, graft survival rates were 88.0% and 86.9% and patient survival rates were 96.6% and 96.7%, respectively. The estimated combined endpoint-free survival rate was 71.4% with tacrolimus and 55.4% with CsA-ME (P 6 mmol/L (26.3% versus 12.6%, P

Risk factors for cardiovascular events after successful renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is a frequent cause of morbidity after renal transplantation. The aims of this study were to evaluate the incidence of cardiovascular events and to identify the main risk factors for cardiovascular complications and mortality in 2071 white adults with a renal transplant functioning for at least 1 year. METHODS: Clinical events, routine biochemistry, and prescribed drugs at month 1, month 6, and yearly after transplantation were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of cardiovascular events increased over time. At 15 years after transplantation, only 47% of surviving patients had not experienced any cardiovascular event. Risk factors associated with cardiovascular complications were male gender (P=0.04), age (P<0.0001), arterial hypertension before transplantation (P<0.0001), longer pretransplant dialysis (P<0.0001), cardiovascular event before transplantation (P<0.0001), older era of transplantation (P=0.0009), center-specific effect (P=0.003), posttransplant diabetes mellitus (P=0.01), increased pulse pressure after transplantation (P=0.02), intake of corticosteroids (P=0.016), intake of azathioprine (P=0.016), lower serum albumin after transplantation (P=0.004), and higher serum triglyceride levels after transplantation (P=0.007). The risk of death was increased in patients with low or elevated hematocrit, while it was minimal with values around 38%. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events after successful renal transplantation not only relates to baseline cardiovascular risk factors present at transplantation, but also to immunosuppressive drugs and posttransplantation traditional and nontraditional risk factors.

A randomized exploratory trial of steroid avoidance in renal transplant patients treated with everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine.

BACKGROUND: Everolimus and cyclosporine exhibit synergistic immunosuppressive activity when given in combination. In this randomized trial, we explored whether the use of everolimus associated with low-dose cyclosporine could allow an early avoidance of steroids in de novo renal transplant recipients. METHODS: In this exploratory multicenter trial, 65 out of 133 patients treated with basiliximab (days 0 and 4), everolimus 3 mg/day and cyclosporine were randomized to stop steroids on the seventh post-transplant day (group A), whereas the remaining 68 continued low-dose steroid treatment (group B). RESULTS: During the follow-up, 30 patients of group A (46%) resumed steroids. According to the intention-to-treat analysis, the 3-year graft survival rate was 95% in group A and 87% in group B (P = ns). There were more biopsy-proven rejections in group A, the difference being of borderline significance (32% vs 18%; P = 0.059). After 3 years, mean creatinine clearance was 52.3 +/- 17.1 ml/min in group A and 52.2 +/- 21.5 ml/min in group B. It was similar in the group A patients who experienced rejection (49.8 +/- 14.7 ml/min) and those who did not (53.6 +/- 18.3 ml/min; P = 0.319). Mean serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels were, respectively, less than 250 mg/dl and less than 200 mg/dl in both groups, without any significant difference. Vascular thrombosis (0 vs 11.7%; P = 0.0043) was more frequent in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment based on everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine allowed excellent renal graft survival and stable graft function at 3 years. An early discontinuation of steroids increased the risk of acute rejection, but was associated with a better graft survival in the long-term. However, it was well tolerated only by 54% of patients.

Incidence of second primary cancer in transplanted patients.

BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplanted patients have a three- to fourfold higher lifetime risk of developing a cancer than the general population. However, the incidence of a second primary cancer in transplanted patients has never been studied, despite the fact that the presence of regular follow-ups and the increased survival of these patients make them a very attractive model. METHODS: We investigated the incidence of a second primary cancer (SPC) in 7,636 patients who underwent a kidney, liver, lung or heart transplant between 1970 and 2004, and were followed-up for 51,819 person-years. RESULTS: During the follow-up, 499 subjects developed a first cancer (annual incidence: 98.6 x 10,000 PY), and 22 of them developed a SPC (annual incidence: 3.9 x 10,000 PY). The annual incidence of a SPC in the transplanted patients who developed a first cancer was 107.8 x 10,000 PY, giving a standardized incidence ratio of 1.1 (95% CI: 0.83-1.41). CONCLUSIONS: This result shows that the incidence of the SPC was the same as the incidence of a first cancer. Our study does not indicate an increased risk of SPC in transplanted subjects who already suffered a first malignancy.

Natural history of hepatitis B and C in renal allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: In renal allograft recipients, most cases of liver dysfunction are caused by hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus (HCV). The natural history of hepatitis C and B was studied in 286 renal allograft recipients who received a kidney allograft between 1972 and 1989 when tests for anti-HCV became available. METHODS: In all patients, hepatitis B (HB) surface (s) antigen (Ag) was tested before and anti-HCV (by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay II) after transplantation. RESULTS: At enrollment in 1989 (5.5+/-4 years after transplantation), 209 patients were anti-HCV positive (C+), 42 patients were HBsAg-positive (B+), and 35 patients were both B+ and C+ (C+B+). One hundred four patients were receiving azathioprine (AZA) and 182 were on cyclosporine A (CsA). Since transplantation, the median follow-up was 18 years in AZA-treated and 13 years in CsA-treated patients. Liver biopsy showed chronic hepatitis in 73 patients, cirrhosis in 20 patients, and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis in 2 patients. In 34 patients, liver biopsy was repeated, and progression of fibrosis was observed in 24 patients. The 12-year patient survival rate was similar in B+, C+, and B+C+ patients (67%, 78%, and 71%, respectively; P=not significant). Liver-related death was the first cause of death in B+ and B+C+ infected patients (58% and 72%, respectively), whereas cardiovascular disease was the leading cause of death in C+ patients (40%). Multivariate analysis showed that older age (>40 years) (relative risk [RR], 2.8), B+ status (RR, 2.36), and C+ status (RR, 1.65) were independently associated with a worse patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: In the long term, B+ patients had a higher risk of death related to liver disease than C+ patients, and co-infection did not worsen patient survival.

The long-term prognosis of renal transplantation in patients with lupus nephritis.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available about the long-term outcome of renal transplantation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Between June 1982 and 2004, a total of 33 adults with lupus nephritis received 35 kidney allografts. Outcomes of these grafts and those of 70 controls matched for age, sex, and donor source who underwent transplantation during the same period were compared. RESULTS: Mean follow-up after renal transplantation was 91 +/- 59 months for patients with lupus and 90 +/- 64 months for controls. Actuarial 15-year patient (80% versus 83%) and death-censored graft survival rates (69% versus 67%) were not significantly different between patients with lupus and controls. Risks for acute and chronic rejection, arterial hypertension, and infection were not different between the 2 groups. Mean serum creatinine levels also were similar in the 2 groups at the last follow-up visit. Intravascular thrombotic events occurred in 9 patients with SLE (26%) and 6 controls (8.6%; P = 0.038). In the SLE group, 6 of 7 antiphospholipid (aPL) antibody-positive versus 3 of 17 aPL antibody-negative patients experienced thrombotic events ( P = 0.015). Recurrence of lupus nephritis was documented in 3 renal grafts (8.6%), but no graft was lost because of recurrent lupus nephritis. CONCLUSION: Long-term patient and graft survival probabilities were similar in patients with SLE and matched controls. The risk for thrombotic complications was greater in patients with SLE, particularly aPL-positive patients. Nephritis recurred in less than 10% of patients with SLE and did not influence graft survival.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin A microemulsion in renal transplantation: 2 year follow-up results.

BACKGROUND: Comparison studies of calcineurin inhibitors as cornerstone immunosuppressants in renal transplantation have demonstrated that tacrolimus consistently reduces acute rejection rates and, in some studies, also improves long-term renal outcome in comparison to cyclosporin A (CsA). The aim of the present 2 year follow-up of the European Tacrolimus vs Cyclosporin A Microemulsion Renal Transplantation Study was to investigate long-term clinical outcome in terms of rate of acute rejection, graft and patient survival and graft function. METHODS: The European Tacrolimus vs Cyclosporin A Microemulsion Renal Transplantation Study was a randomized, comparative 6 month trial of the calcineurin inhibitors tacrolimus and CsA in combination with both azathioprine and steroids. The intent-to-treat population (ITT) consisted of 286 patients in the tacrolimus arm and 271 in the CsA microemulsion (CsA-ME) arm. Whereas whole blood level targets were 10-20 and 5-15 ng/ml for tacrolimus and 100-400 and 100-200 ng/ml for CsA during months 0-3 and 4-6, respectively, during the investigator-driven follow-up after termination of the main study (months 7-24) no specific calcineurin inhibitor target levels were required. Follow-up data were collected at 2 years post-transplantation from 237 (82.9% of the ITT population) patients who received tacrolimus and 222 (81.9% of the ITT population) patients who received CsA-ME. RESULTS: Calculated on ITT populations, mortality (2.0% vs 3.3%; P<0.05 in Kaplan-Meier analysis) was lower, but rate of graft loss (9.3% vs 11.2%; P = 0.12 in Kaplan-Meier analysis) was not significantly different after 2 years with tacrolimus- vs CsA-ME-based immunosuppression. Biopsy-proven acute rejection was significantly lower (19.6%) with tacrolimus than with CsA-ME (37.3%) during months 0-6 (P<0.0001), but was not significantly different during months 7-12 and 13-24 of follow-up (1.7% and 0.8% with tacrolimus and 4.7% and 0.9% with CsA-ME, respectively). A composite endpoint consisting of graft loss, patient death and biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred significantly more frequently in CsA-ME patients than in tacrolimus patients (42.8% vs 25.9%; P<0.001) during 24 months follow-up. Renal function 2 years post-transplant, measured by serum creatinine concentrations, was significantly better in tacrolimus-based compared with CsA-ME-based immunosuppression (136.9 vs 161.6 micromol/l; P<0.01). Cornerstone immunosuppression remained unchanged in 82.5% and 66.2% of patients treated with tacrolimus and CsA-ME, respectively. At 2 years, more patients in the tacrolimus arm were off steroids and received calcineurin inhibitor monotherapy, and fewer tacrolimus patients remained on a triple immunosuppressive regimen. The cardiovascular risk profile was affected favourably in the tacrolimus arm, with lower cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations (despite less use of cholesterol-lowering drugs); no significant difference in requirement for antidiabetic medication was noted. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 year study results confirm that tacrolimus is a highly efficacious cornerstone immunosuppressant in kidney transplantation. Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression may induce long-term benefits with regard to graft function and graft survival. The overall side-effect profile is considered to be favourable.

Is cyclosporine in renal-transplant recipients more effective when given twice a day than in a single daily dose?

BACKGROUND: It is still unknown whether it is better to administer cyclosporine (CsA) once or twice a day to renal-transplant patients. METHODS: Fifty-four patients were randomized to receive CsA once a day (OD group, 28 patients) or twice a day (BD group, 26 patients). Clinical parameters and pharmacokinetic studies were regularly monitored over the first year. RESULTS: Two patients lost their grafts because of renal vascular thrombosis. A patient in the BD group died. The other 51 patients were alive with graft functioning after a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Five patients per group had reversible acute rejection. There was a not significant trend toward a lower mean serum creatinine in OD than in BD (1.38 +/- 0.38 and 1.7 +/- 0.80 mg/dL at 1 year posttransplant, respectively). In 47 patients, 319 pharmacokinetic studies were performed. We measured the area under the concentration-time curve during the first 4 hours (AUC0-4) and CsA blood levels at 0, 2, and 4 hours after dosing. C0 was significantly lower in OD than in BD (P=0.0011), whereas C2 (P<0.0001) and C4 (P<0.0001) were significantly higher in OD than in BD. In OD, the AUC was higher than in BD (P<0.0001). OD allows us to reach high levels of C2 and AUC for several hours after dosing, whereas BD showed persistently high levels throughout the whole day. CONCLUSION: No difference in survival and rejection rates were observed between OD and BD groups.

Impact of chronic allograft nephropathy and subsequent modifications of immunosuppressive therapy on late graft outcomes in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is the leading cause of organ failure in renal transplant recipients. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of varying immunosuppression in CAN patients on long-term graft survival. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 158 cyclosporin (CsA)-treated renal transplant recipients with biopsy-proven CAN with follow-up of >1 year. Immunosuppression remained unchanged in 75 (NOVAR) and was modified in 83 patients (VAR). In 36.1% of VAR patients, it was increased; in 63.8%, the addition of other immunosuppressants was associated with a 20% reduction in or withdrawal of CsA. A regression model, for creatinine clearance (CrCl) slope analysis after therapy variation, and Cox's analysis were applied. RESULTS: In VAR patients, two-phase regression did not show a correlation between the inflection point in the CrCl slope and treatment variation. Changing immunosuppression gave a borderline advantage in long-term graft survival compared with NOVAR (P = 0.088). In univariate analysis, severe histological lesions, proteinuria >0.5 g/day and CrCl <25 ml/min at biopsy correlated with poor graft outcome (P = 0.0009). In multivariate analysis, only proteinuria and low CrCl remained significative. Stratifying histological lesions in relation to therapy variation showed that severe lesions significantly decreased survival in both VAR and NOVAR groups; however, the highly negative impact of severe lesions in NOVAR patients on graft survival [relative risk (RR) 3.602] was reduced in VAR patients (RR 1.951), with a 10 year graft survival since biopsy of 0.16 vs 0.34 (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In transplant patients with CAN, variation of immunosuppression can reduce the negative impact of severe chronic lesions.