Head-to-head comparison of F-18 FDG PET/CT in radioidine refractory thyroid cancer patients with elevated versus suppressed TSH levels a pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: To perform a head-to-head comparison of the uptake pattern of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose in positron emission computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) in radioiodine refractory thyroid carcinomas (RAIR) in the same patient under elevated TSH levels (eTSH) and suppressed TSH levels (sTSH). METHODS: FDG PET/CT studies were performed under two conditions: levothyroxine intake (sTSH) and 30 days after hormonal withdrawal (eTSH). SUVmax values and the number of lesions detected (local recurrence and metastases in cervical and distant lymph nodes, lungs and bone) where blindly evaluated. Blood serum TSH and Tg levels were obtained prior to both studies. FDG PET/CT imaging, neck ultrasound, biopsy and follow-up were considered the reference standard. RESULTS: Fifteen patients performed both eTSH and sTSH FDG PET/CT studies. Both were positive for metastases in 80% of the patients. eTSH FDG PET/CT studies did not reveal increased uptake (p = 0.0640) and did not demonstrate a higher number of lesions (p = 0.320) when compared to sTSH FDG PET/CT studies. There was no change in the clinical management of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: eTSH FDG PET/CT in patients with RAIR did not show more metastases in comparison to sTSH FDG PET/CT and there was no impact in clinical management of patients. Elevating TSH levels (whether by hormonal withdrawal or recombinant TSH) in patients being submitted to FDG PET/CT may not be necessary.

Reduced insulin sensitivity in differentiated thyroid cancer patients with suppressed TSH.

OBJECTIVE: TSH-suppression is a therapy for thyroid cancer management, but it may lead to adverse effects, which should be balanced with its benefits. Previous studies evaluating the consequences of TSH suppression on insulin sensitivity have only been done with indirect techniques, and results were controversial. Therefore, we aimed to assess insulin sensitivity in patients with thyroid cancer and suppressed thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) with the most appropriate direct method (hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp) in order to get a more conclusive response about the topic. METHODS: A group of 20 non-obese and non-diabetic thyroid cancer patients with suppressed TSH underwent a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp to evaluate insulin sensitivity. Their results were compared to the results of a sex and body mass index (BMI) -paired control group composed of 20 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: Patients were all female, aged 36.8 ± 10.2 years-old, with mean TSH 0.1 ± 0.1 µIU/mL and mean BMI 26.2 ± 3.3 kg/m2. Insulin sensitivity, determined by the insulin-stimulated glucose uptake (M-value), was lower in the patients group (4.2 ± 1.6 mg/min*kg versus 5.8 ± 1.7, age-adjusted p-value = 0.0205). CONCLUSION: This study shows for the first time that subclinical thyrotoxicosis in patients with thyroid cancer is associated with insulin resistance, as measured by hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique. Such finding may be taken into consideration by clinicians when balancing risks and benefits of TSH-suppression therapy in thyroid cancer patients.