Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Electrodiagnosis in the Evaluation of Clinical Suspicion of Lumbosacral Radiculopathy.

(1) Background: The diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy involves anamnesis, an assessment of sensitivity and strength, diagnostic imaging-usually magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-and electrodiagnostic testing (EDX), typically electromyography (EMG), and electroneurography (ENG). MRI evaluates the structures supporting the spinal cord, while EDX evaluates root functionality. The present study aimed to analyze the concordance of MRI and EDX findings in patients with clinically suspected radiculopathy. Additionally, we investigated the comparison between these two reference tests and various clinical variables and questionnaires. (2) Methods: We designed a prospective epidemiological study of consecutive cases with an observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, and double-blind nature following the STROBE guidelines, encompassing 142 patients with clinical suspicion of lumbosacral radiculopathy. (3) Results: Of the sample, 58.5% tested positive for radiculopathy using EDX as the reference test, while 45.8% tested positive using MRI. The comparison between MRI and EDX in the diagnosis of radiculopathy in patients with clinical suspicion was not significant; the overall agreement was 40.8%. Only the years with symptoms were comparatively significant between the positive and negative radiculopathy groups as determined by EDX. (4) Conclusion: The comparison between lumbar radiculopathy diagnoses in patients with clinically suspected pathology using MRI and EDX as diagnostic modalities did not yield statistically significant findings. MRI and EDX are complementary tests assessing different aspects in patients with suspected radiculopathy; degeneration of the structures supporting the spinal cord does not necessarily imply root dysfunction.

In Vivo Effects of Joint Movement on Nerve Mechanical Properties Assessed with Shear-Wave Elastography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Peripheral nerves are subjected to mechanical tension during limb movements and body postures. Nerve response to tensile stress can be assessed in vivo with shear-wave elastography (SWE). Greater tensile loads can lead to greater stiffness, which can be quantified using SWE. Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to perform an overview of the effect of joint movements on nerve mechanical properties in healthy nerves. The initial search (July 2023) yielded 501 records from six databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Science Direct). A total of 16 studies were included and assessed with a modified version of the Downs and Black checklist. Our results suggest an overall tendency for stiffness increase according to a pattern of neural tensioning. The main findings from the meta-analysis showed a significant increase in nerve stiffness for the median nerve with wrist extension (SMD [95%CI]: 3.16 [1.20, 5.12]), the ulnar nerve with elbow flexion (SMD [95%CI]: 2.91 [1.88, 3.95]), the sciatic nerve with ankle dorsiflexion (SMD [95%CI]: 1.13 [0.79, 1.47]), and the tibial nerve with both hip flexion (SMD [95%CI]: 2.14 [1.76, 2.51]) and ankle dorsiflexion (SMD [95%CI]: 1.52 [1.02, 2.02]). The effect of joint movement on nerve stiffness also depends on the nerve segment, the amount of movement of the joint mobilized, and the position of other joints comprised in the entirety of the nerve length. However, due to the limited number of studies, many aspects of nerve behavior together with the effect of using different ultrasound equipment or transducers for nerve stiffness evaluation still need to be fully investigated.

Diagnostic accuracy of the upper limb neurodynamic test 1 using neurodynamic sequencing in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The upper limb neurodynamic test 1 is used in the diagnosis of median nerve neuropathies such as carpal tunnel syndrome but its diagnostic validity remains limited. Neurodynamic sequencing has been suggested to increase the specificity of the neurodynamic tests, however, to date, information on the diagnostic accuracy of this variation in neurodynamic testing is required. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the diagnostic validity of the local sequence of ULNT1 (LS-ULNT1) (i.e. a sequence that begins at the joint where the problem is (wrist) and progressively moves joints further away from it), in the diagnosis of CTS. A secondary aim was to describe the location of sensory responses to this modified neurodynamic test sequence. DESIGN: A prospective diagnostic accuracy study was designed. METHOD: Nerve conduction studies were used as the gold standard. The LS-ULNT1 was performed in 58 consecutive patients (17 men, 44 women) with suspected CTS. RESULTS: Sensitivity of the LS-ULNT1 was 65.7% (CI 48.0-80.9%) and the specificity was 95.7% (CI 78.1-99.9%). The positive and negative likelihood ratios were >5 and < 0.5, respectively, indicating the ability of the test to generate small but sometimes important changes in post-test probability. CONCLUSIONS: The overall results of this study showed that the LS-ULNT1 could be useful in confirming the diagnosis of CTS. The test demonstrated high specificity and the +LR indicated the ability of the test to generate changes in posttest probability, especially with a positive LS-ULNT1 result.

Is the Straight Leg Raise Suitable for the Diagnosis of Radiculopathy? Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy in a Phase III Study.

The straight leg raise test (SLR) has been proposed to detect increased nerve mechanosensitivity of the lower limbs in individuals with low back pain. However, its validity in the diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy shows very variable results. The aim of this study was to analyse the diagnostic validity of the SLR including well-defined diagnostic criteria (a change in symptoms with the structural differentiation manoeuvre and the reproduction of the patient's symptoms during the test or the asymmetries in the range of motion or symptoms location between limbs) in a sample of participants in phase III with suspicion of lumbar radiculopathy using the electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) as the reference standard. A phase III diagnostic accuracy study was designed. In total, 142 individuals with suspected lumbosacral radiculopathy referred for EDX participated in the study. Each participant was tested with EDX and SLR. SLR was considered positive using three diagnostic criteria. The sensitivity of the SLR for Criterion 3 was 89.02% (CI 81.65-96.40), the specificity was 25.00% (CI 13.21-36.79), and the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 1.19 (CI 1.01-1.40) and 0.44 (0.21-0.94), respectively. SLR showed limited validity in the diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy. The incorporation of more objective diagnostic criteria (asymmetry in range of motion or localisation of symptoms) improved the diagnostic validity but the imprecision of the confidence intervals limited the interpretation of the results.

Normal response to tibial neurodynamic test in asymptomatic subjects.

BACKGROUND: The straight leg raise test (SLR) is one of the most performed physical tests for mechanosensitivity and impairment of the nervous system. According to the anatomy of the tibial nerve, ankle dorsiflexion and eversion movements could be used to perform the tibial neurodynamic test (TNT). To date, no study has documented the normal responses of the TNT. OBJECTIVE: To document normal responses of the TNT in asymptomatic individuals and to investigate influences from sex and leg dominance. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with 44 asymptomatic volunteer subjects, a total of 88 lower limbs, was carried out. The range of motion (ROM), quality, and distribution of sensory responses were recorded. The hip flexion ROM was measured when subjects reported an intensity of their symptoms of 2/10 (P1) and 8/10 (P2). RESULTS: The mean ROM for hip flexion at P1 was 44.22 ± 13.13∘ and 66.73 ± 14.30∘ at P2. Hip flexion was significantly greater at P2 than P1 (p< 0.001). However, it was not different between sex or limbs (p> 0.05). The descriptor of the quality of sensory responses most often used by participants was stretching (88.6% and 87.5% for P1 and P2, respectively) in the popliteal fossa and posterior calf. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the sensory responses of asymptomatic subjects resulting from the TNT. Our findings indicate that TNT responses are independent of the influence of sex or leg dominance.

Normal response to sural neurodynamic test in asymptomatic participants. A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Neurodynamic tests (NDTs) consist of a combination of movements aimed to stress different parts of the nervous system and are considered to be able to detect increased nerve mechanosensitivity. Currently, there are no studies in healthy subjects that define the normal response to sural neurodynamic test (NDTSUR). OBJECTIVES: The main aim of this study was to document normal responses of the NDTSUR in asymptomatic participants. The secondary aim was to investigate potential gender and leg dominance influences. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was designed. METHODS: NDTSUR was performed on 44 asymptomatic participants with a total of 88 lower limbs. The range of motion at the point of first appearance of symptoms (S1) and the point of pain tolerance (S2), quality and distribution of sensory responses were recorded. RESULTS: Hip flexion was significantly greater (p < 0.001) at S2 (63.6 ± 13.1°) than S1 (42.5 ± 12°) and the mean difference was 21.8° (95% CI: 21.8; 22.8) (p < 0.001). However, hip flexion was not different between gender nor dominance (p > 0.05). The descriptor of the quality of the sensory responses more often used by participants was stretching (87% and 76% for S1 and S2, respectively) in the posterior knee and lateral leg. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the sensory responses of asymptomatic participants resulting from the NDTSUR. The findings indicate that NDTSUR responses are independent of the influence of gender or leg dominance.

Neurodynamic test of the peroneal nerve: Study of the normal response in asymptomatic subjects.

BACKGROUND: Neurodynamic tests (NDTs) have shown to be useful in evaluating neural tissue involvement. Peroneal nerve reaches high importance in ankle injuries. However, up to date, no study has documented the normal responses for this nerve. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to document normal responses of the peroneal neurodynamic test (NDTPER) in asymptomatic subjects. Differences in sensory response depending on sex and leg dominance were also examined. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was designed. METHOD: Forty-four asymptomatic subjects with a total of 88 lower limbs were tested. The range of motion (ROM) at the point of first appearance of symptoms (S1) and the point of symptoms tolerance (S2), quality and distribution of sensory responses were recorded. RESULTS: Hip flexion was significantly higher at S2 than S1 (mean difference, 27.22°; 95% CI: 25.29°, 29.14°; p < 0.001). However, it was not different between sex, nor dominance (p > 0.05). The descriptor of the quality of sensory responses more often used by subjects was stretching (90.9%) in the external foot (74.6%). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the normal hip flexion angle and quality and distribution of sensory responses to the NDTPER in asymptomatic subjects. Responses were independent of the influence of sex or leg dominance.