Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 23(3): 418-24, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26767826

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of office hysteroscopic polypectomy using a novel continuous-flow operative 16F mini-resectoscope. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective case series (Canadian Task Force classification III). SETTING: "SS Antonio e Biagio" Hospital, Alessandria, and University "Federico II" of Naples. PATIENTS: One hundred eighty-two patients with endometrial polyps. INTERVENTIONS: Hysteroscopic polypectomy performed with 16F mini-resectoscope in an office setting, without analgesia and/or anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Polypectomy was successfully performed in 175 patients in a single surgical step (96.15%), with only 1 patient (.54%) requiring a second office surgical step to complete the surgery. Seven patients (3.84%) were excluded from the analysis of operative parameters because of severe pelvic pain during the office procedure, which required a second inpatient surgical step. No major complications were recorded. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that removal of endometrial polyps using the 16F mini-resectoscope in an office setting is a feasible and safe surgical option. Outpatient see-and-treat polypectomy is an acceptable and effective alternative to inpatient resectoscopic polypectomy.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Histeroscopia , Dor/prevenção & controle , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Pólipos/cirurgia , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/instrumentação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/métodos , Analgesia/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Histeroscopia/instrumentação , Histeroscopia/métodos , Itália/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/epidemiologia , Medição da Dor , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pólipos/epidemiologia , Pólipos/patologia , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Uterinas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Uterinas/patologia
2.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 25(9): 755-9, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26275047

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Morcellation of a bulky uterus after total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) is a challenge for those dealing with advanced laparoscopic surgery. However, there are no laparoscopic standardized procedures available to date. We developed a laparoscopic cold knife technique with the aim of demonstrating a simple and reproducible method of sectioning and vaginal retrieval of the bulky uterus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 2012 to June 2014, patients who underwent TLH for benign indication, with a uterus size over 12 gestational weeks, were prospectively admitted into the clinical study. Before specimen vaginal retrieval, uterine section was achieved by Chardonnens' cold knife with the aim of obtaining two uterus halves sectioned longitudinally and held together only by the posterior cervical wall. We performed the procedure in a containment system to avoid myometrial spillage into the abdomen. RESULTS: Twenty-nine women with a bulky uterus were treated by TLH and the cold knife section technique. The uterine size ranged from 240 to 850 g (median, 460 g), and the average morcellation operative time was 11.3 minutes. All procedures were completed successfully without complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the cold knife uterine section technique after TLH is a feasible, simple, and reproducible method of bulky uterus morcellation, even if further research is advisable to fully evaluate the advantages of this procedure.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Doenças Uterinas/cirurgia , Temperatura Baixa , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Doenças Uterinas/patologia
3.
Surg Endosc ; 28(6): 1949-53, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24566741

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) is becoming an increasingly popular treatment in endometrial cancer. Intra-abdominal or vaginal uterus morcellation are well described and routinely practiced techniques in removing a benign bulky uterus but contraindicated in endometrial cancer. In malignancy, the uterus needs to be removed intact to avoid intraperitoneal spillage of the endometrial cancer cells, and a uterine size of 12 gestational weeks (g.w.) or larger has been considered a contraindication for the laparoscopic approach. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a sealed vaginal morcellation technique in a bag for endometrial cancer laparoscopic treatment. METHODS: We prospectively scheduled 12 patients affected by endometrial cancer with uterus bigger than 12 g.w. for endometrial cancer laparoscopic treatment. After performing TLH, a sterile plastic wrapping bag was inserted by a 12 mm camera port by rolling it onto the blunt probe. The uterus was covered from the fundus to the cervix, placing the free edges of the bag down into the manipulator cup with two blunt graspers. The specimen completely covered by the bag was then pushed down under direct laparoscopic vision through colpotomy and pulled out from the vagina. The uterus was morcellated by the vaginal route. RESULTS: All patients underwent laparoscopic treatment with vaginal uterine morcellation. The mean uterus weight was 290.8 ± 79.7 g with a mean morcellation operative time of 12.1 min. All vaginal morcellations were completed successfully. All patients were without evidence of local or distant recurrence at the median follow-up time of 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: This technique allows the surgeon to morcellate a bulky uterus in cases of endometrial cancer and reduces the chance of neoplastic cell spillage during debulking at TLH. Vaginal morcellation following oncologic rules permits a rapid uterine extraction and may avoid a number of unnecessary laparotomies.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio/cirurgia , Histerectomia/instrumentação , Histerectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/instrumentação , Laparoscopia/métodos , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Tamanho do Órgão , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Ultrassonografia , Útero/diagnóstico por imagem , Útero/patologia
4.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 288(2): 349-53, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23417150

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We investigated the feasibility and acceptability of office hysteroscopic polypectomy using a new continuous-flow operative 16 Fr Gubbini's mini-resectoscope. This is a prospective clinical study (Canadian Task Force classification III). METHODS: The office hysteroscopic polypectomy was performed with a mini-resectoscope without analgesia or anesthesia. We evaluated the polyp size and the number, the effectiveness of resection, the operating time, the pelvic pain and complications. RESULTS: The office hysteroscopic polypectomy was successfully performed in all 33 patients. The polyps ranged in size from 5 to 50 mm with a mean of 18.15 ± 11.45 mm. We analyzed the operating time with a mean of 11.45 ± 4.71 min: 29 procedures took less than 15 min from the start of vaginoscopy to the end of surgery. Overall mean visual analog scale (VAS) calculated was 2.48 ± 1.37 (range 0-6). The correlation between the size of the polyps and operating time was statistically significant (p < 0.001). No major complications were recorded. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data demonstrated that can be possible to remove endometrial polyps by hysteroscopy, using the mini-resectoscope, in an office setting. All procedures were completed successfully and well tolerated with a little discomfort permitting the removal also of big sized polyps without a statistical correlation between VAS and size of polyps or operating time. The outpatient polypectomy is a less-costing procedure and represents an acceptable and effective alternative to inpatient resectoscopic polypectomy, leading to a complete polyp excision in nearly all patients.


Assuntos
Histeroscópios , Histeroscopia/instrumentação , Pólipos/cirurgia , Doenças Uterinas/cirurgia , Adulto , Assistência Ambulatorial , Feminino , Humanos , Histeroscopia/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Medição da Dor , Dor Pélvica/etiologia , Pólipos/patologia , Doenças Uterinas/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...