Poor Acceptance of the Revised Classification of Premalignant Anal Lesions Following the LAST Standardized Project.

INTRODUCTION: The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology (LAST) Project recommended unified classification for HPV-associated squamous lesions of the lower anogenital tract, using a 2-tiered nomenclature in 2013. Adherence to the new nomenclature worldwide is unknown. This study aims to assess the trend of the use of the two-tiered High Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Low Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL/LSIL) as opposed to the traditional three-tiered Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia (AIN I/II/III) classification as suggested by the LAST Project. METHODS: A literature search on full-text English language studies of premalignant anal lesion was performed on PubMed from 2002-2022. The studies were categorized by continent, and the prevalence of HSIL/LSIL classification vs AIN I/II/III was calculated. RESULTS: 546 studies and 251 studies were identified using the AIN I/II/II and the HSIL/LSIL classification respectively. Global trend suggested a statistically significant downward trend in the use of the two-tiered nomenclature system in publications globally. Regional trend including North America, Europe, and other (Asia and Latin America) showed variance in adoption of the two-tiered nomenclature system. CONCLUSION: Despite multidisciplinary collaborative effort, adherence to the recommendations to use the two-tiered system for HPV-associated premalignant anal lesions continues to be suboptimal. Further efforts are needed to identify the cause of poor adherence to be able to create strategies that reinforces unification of terminology and integration of LAST the recommendations.

Engaging primary care physicians is critical in the screening and diagnosis of colorectal cancer at safety-net hospital systems.

Background: Primary care physicians (PCP) play a key role in offering colorectal cancer (CRC) screenings, particularly amongst underserved populations. Given potential delays in or omission of CRC screening in the absence of a PCP, we aimed to determine stage of CRC at diagnosis in an underserved population. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted at two Los Angeles County safety-net hospitals. Inclusion criteria were a CRC diagnosis between 2018 and 2021 and age between 50 and 75 years at diagnosis time. The primary outcome was the cancer stage at diagnosis. Results: A total of 373 patients were included, of those, 52.5 % had a PCP. Compared to others, PCP was similar in age, racial composition, and primary spoken language (Table 1). Of patients with a PCP, 52.0% were diagnosed by screening. After screening, the most common indication for colonoscopy were blood per rectum (24.9 %) and imaging findings (18.0 %). Patients with a PCP had a significantly lower rate of late stage CRC than those without a PCP (42.4 % vs. 68.0 %, p < 0.001). After adjustment, having a PCP was associated with significantly reduced odds of late stage CRC (Adjusted Odds Ratio 0.83, 95 % Confidence Interval [0.68-1.04]). Having a PCP was not associated with any adjusted increase in number of adenomas or tumor size. Conclusions: Patients with a PCP, irrespective of undergoing screening, were diagnosed at earlier CRC stages. This underlines the crucial role of PCPs in CRC and diagnosis, reinforcing the need for their active involvement in these processes.

Resilience as an Independent Predictor of Bowel Related Quality of Life After Spinal Cord Injury.

Bowel dysfunction remains a prominent priority in the rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injuries (SCIs). However, our understanding of the factors that influence bowel-related quality of life (QoL) in this population remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the potential role of resilience, defined as an individual's capacity to cope with and adapt to adversity, as a predictor of bowel-related QoL among the patients with SCI. A cohort of adult patients with SCI who received bowel and bladder care at an outpatient clinic within a large rehabilitation hospital was identified through a prospectively collected database. Resilience was measured using the Spinal Cord Injury-Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) Resilience Short Form, whereas bowel QoL was assessed using the Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Quality of Life (IBS-QoL) questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were employed to identify predictors of bowel-related QoL. The examined variables included age, gender, level and completeness of injury, time since injury, hand function, resilience, and the severity of bowel dysfunction as measured using the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score (NBDS). A total of 73 patients participated in this study, with a mean age of 44.01 ± 13.43 years and comprising mostly men (n = 57, 78%). The results revealed a significant correlation between resilience scores and the total score of IBS-QoL (ρ = -0.47, p < 0.0001). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that both resilience and the severity of bowel dysfunction were significant independent predictors of bowel-related QoL, with resilience demonstrating a stronger association. Overall, this study elucidates the importance of resilience in shaping patients' perceptions of their bowel health within the SCI population. In addition to the more expected determinants of bowel-related QoL, such as the severity of bowel dysfunction, resilience emerged as a notable factor. Accordingly, integrating interventions that enhance resilience within bowel rehabilitation programs may yield improvements in patients' perceived bowel health beyond the benefits achievable through bowel function enhancement alone.

Content, face, and construct validity of the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) as a measure of bowel-related quality of life in spinal cord injury.

INTRODUCTION: Neurogenic bowel dysfunction is commonly encountered after a spinal cord injury (SCI), leading to a tremendous impact on quality of life (QOL). The neurogenic bowel dysfunction score (NBDS) is commonly used to measure the severity of bowel dysfunction and predict QOL. However, there is no comprehensive instrument to assess bowel-specific QOL for SCI patients. Instead, the Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) questionnaire evaluates the impact of bowel dysfunction on several aspects of QOL, although this questionnaire has not been validated for the SCI population. Motivated by the compelling need of instruments to accurately evaluate the QOL in patients who develope NBD after SCI, we aimed to assess the construct, content, and face validity of IBS-QOL in this population. METHODS: Adult SCI patients with at least 3 months after their injury were recruited from the outpatient clinic of a national rehabilitation hospital. Patients completed the NBDS and IBS-QOL via telephone interview or paper survey in the clinic. Content and face validity were assessed via interviews with professionals with expertise in providing chronic care for SCI, as well as a subgroup of patients. Construct validity was assessed using the hypotheses testing method. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's ⍺. Factor analysis was performed to assess the dimensionality of the IBS-QOL in the SCI population. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients with a median age of 45.5 years (interquartile range: 21-79) participated in the study. The majority of the sample were men (n = 82, 77%) and had endured thoracolumbar injuries (n = 74, 71.2%). Twelve patients (seven English- and five Spanish speakers) and six professionals took part in content/face validation interviews. The median IBS-QOL total score was 15.91/100 (interquartile range: 4.55-33.14). IBS-QOL differentiated the subgroups of patients with severe bowel symptoms in terms of uneasiness, sweating, or headaches during bowel emptying (p = 0.0003), time spent on bowel emptying (p = 0.0065), flatus incontinence (p = 0.0076), and overall satisfaction with bowel function (p < 0.001), demonstrating its adequate construct validity. Interviews with the patients and professionals supported the comprehensiveness, comprehensibility, and relevance of IBS-QOL for assessment of bowel-related QOL in the SCI population. Item-level analysis of professional responses showed that 97% of questions were relevant to the construct and population of interest. Internal consistency analysis yielded a Cronbach's ⍺ of 0.9684. Exploratory factor analysis yielded six underlying factors which cumulatively accounted for 72.21% of the total variance, reflecting the dimensionality of bowel-related QOL in SCI population. DISCUSSION: IBS-QOL questionnaire is a comprehensive measure of bowel-related QOL which encompasses the concerns of SCI patients. Our findings support the content, face and construct validity of IBS-QOL as a measure of bowel-related QOL in SCI. Further studies are warranted to assess the reliability and responsiveness of IBS-QOL, and to evaluate its performance across different patient populations.