Why "improved" water sources are not always safe.

Existing and proposed metrics for household drinking-water services are intended to measure the availability, safety and accessibility of water sources. However, these attributes can be highly variable over time and space and this variation complicates the task of creating and implementing simple and scalable metrics. In this paper, we highlight those factors - especially those that relate to so-called improved water sources - that contribute to variability in water safety but may not be generally recognized as important by non-experts. Problems in the provision of water in adequate quantities and of adequate quality - interrelated problems that are often influenced by human behaviour - may contribute to an increased risk of poor health. Such risk may be masked by global water metrics that indicate that we are on the way to meeting the world's drinking-water needs. Given the complexity of the topic and current knowledge gaps, international metrics for access to drinking water should be interpreted with great caution. We need further targeted research on the health impacts associated with improvements in drinking-water supplies.

Les indicateurs existants et proposés pour la distribution de l'eau potable des ménages visent à mesurer la disponibilité, la salubrité et l'accessibilité des sources d'eau. Cependant, ces caractéristiques peuvent être très variables dans le temps et l'espace, et ces variations compliquent la tâche de création et de mise en œuvre d'indicateurs simples et extensibles. Dans le présent article, nous mettons l'accent sur ces facteurs ­ en particulier, sur ceux qui concernent les sources d'eau soi-disant améliorées ­ qui contribuent à la variabilité de la salubrité de l'eau, mais qui peuvent ne pas être perçus généralement comme importants par les non-spécialistes. Les problèmes d'approvisionnement en eau, en quantité suffisante et en qualité satisfaisante ­ ces problèmes interdépendants sont souvent influencés par le comportement des hommes ­ peuvent contribuer à un risque accru d'être en mauvaise santé. Ce risque peut être masqué par les indicateurs globaux de l'eau qui indiquent que nous sommes en bonne voie de répondre aux besoins en eau potable de la planète. Compte tenu de la complexité du sujet et des lacunes des connaissances actuelles, les indicateurs internationaux pour l'accès à l'eau portable doivent être interprétés avec une grande prudence. Nous avons besoin de recherches ciblées et plus approfondies sur les effets sanitaires des améliorations dans le domaine de l'approvisionnement en eau potable.

Las mediciones existentes y propuestas para los servicios de agua potable de los hogares pretenden considerar la disponibilidad, seguridad y accesibilidad de las fuentes de agua. No obstante, estas características pueden variar mucho a lo largo del tiempo y del espacio, lo que complica la tarea de crear y poner en práctica mediciones sencillas y ampliables. En este documento destacamos los factores, en particular los relacionados con las llamadas fuentes de agua mejoradas, que contribuyen a la variabilidad de la seguridad del agua pero que, por lo general, los legos no identifican como importantes. Los problemas en el suministro de agua en cantidad y calidad suficientes, problemas interrelacionados en los que el comportamiento humano influye a menudo, pueden contribuir a un mayor riesgo de problemas sanitarios. Ese riesgo puede quedar oculto por mediciones de agua globales que indican que vamos camino de satisfacer las necesidades de agua potable en el mundo. Dada la complejidad del tema y las lagunas de conocimiento actuales, las mediciones internacionales sobre el acceso al agua potable deberían interpretarse con mucha cautela. Necesitamos más investigaciones específicas sobre el impacto sanitario asociado a las mejoras de los suministros de agua potable.

Relationship between distance to social gathering facilities and risk of trachoma for households in rural Tanzanian communities.

Few studies have examined the physical isolation of households with trachoma cases. Thus, in this study, we sought to examine the association between household isolation, as measured by distance to social gathering facilities, and risk of trachoma. We hypothesized that households located closer to such facilities would have a decreased risk of trachoma, due to a variety of social, economic, and cultural reasons. To test this hypothesis we conducted a case-control study of 668 households (93 cases, 575 controls) in eight villages in Kongwa District, Tanzania, in 2007. Case households were defined as having a child aged 1-5 years with clinical signs of trachoma. Distance of household's place of residence to three main social gathering facilities - bars/cafés, religious establishments, and commercial/government center - was measured with a portable geographic positioning system. Multiple logistic regression analyses, which controlled for potential confounders and accounted for clustering, demonstrated increased risk of trachoma with increasing distance to social gathering facilities. Compared with distances of ≤700 m, odds of trachoma were approximately two-fold higher for households living >1400 m from bars/cafés and from religious establishments, suggesting increased risk of trachoma for households at the fringes of communities. Targeting these isolated households with special programming along with dissemination through trusted social gathering facilities may improve effectiveness of current prevention efforts.

Comparing the effectiveness of shared versus private latrines in preventing trachoma in rural Tanzania.

Sharing latrines is common in sub-Saharan Africa with anecdotal accounts suggesting a link between water-, sanitation-, and hygiene-related disease and poorly maintained communal latrines. This study examines this link by assessing the association between shared latrines compared with private latrines and risk of trachoma. In 2007, as part of a larger case-control study, we conducted a sub-study on latrine sharing in 594 households (92 cases, 502 controls) in seven rural Tanzanian communities. Case households were defined by having a child with clinical signs of trachoma. Latrine use was associated with a decreased risk of trachoma and there was no difference in risk between households using shared compared with private latrines (adjusted odds ratio = 0.95 [95% confidence interval = 0.55-1.67]). This study emphasizes the need to promote latrine use, which can be facilitated through latrine sharing in resource scarce areas, for prevention of trachoma.

Assessment of latrine use and quality and association with risk of trachoma in rural Tanzania.

The existing evidence regarding latrines and trachoma is inconclusive. Using more precise sanitation measures we examine the association between use and quality of latrines and risk of trachoma. We conducted a case-control study of 678 households (95 cases, 583 controls) in eight villages in Kongwa District, Tanzania. Case households were defined as having a sentinel child with clinical signs of trachoma. A latrine quality score was calculated based on seven indicators and case and control households were compared with respect to use and quality of latrines. Logistic regression analyses controlled for potential confounders. Latrine use was significantly greater in control households than in case households (90.4 vs. 76.8%, P=0.03). The protective effect of latrine use persisted even after controlling for household characteristics significant at P <0.20 (adjusted OR=0.56 [95% CI: 0.32-0.98]). Contrary to expectation, we did not find an inverse association between increasing latrine quality and decreasing odds of trachoma. Although latrine use in the communities was high, latrines, regardless of quality, were significantly associated with decreased risk of trachoma. These findings underscore the importance of achieving 100% latrine use in communities.

Norovirus removal and particle association in a waste stabilization pond.

The presence of norovirus (NoV) genogroup I (GI) and II (GII) was evaluated using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) in the influent, two midtreatment locations, and final effluent of a three-pond serial waste stabilization pond system from December 2005 through June 2006. Additionally, influent and effluent samples were filtered through a cascade of three membrane filters with sequentially smaller pores to determine the size range of particles with which GI and GII were associated. NoV GI and GII removal occurs primarily in the third pond. Viruses were found on large settleable particles (retained on a 180 microm filter), on smaller suspended particles (retained on a 0.45 microm filter), on colloidal particles (retained on a positively charged 0.45 microm filter), and in the final filtrate. Both GI and GII in influent samples were found to be dominantly associated with particles smaller than 180 microm, thereby suggesting that particle settling is not the main virus removal mechanism in the waste stabilization pond system. On average, NoV detected in filtered effluent samples were associated with particles between 0.45 and 180 microm in diameter (47 and 67% of detected GI and GII, respectively). The presence of NoV GI and GII in the final filtrate of influent and effluent samples shows that positively charged membrane filters often used for viral concentration methods are not capable of trapping all viruses present in wastewater samples.