Speech perception in noise by young sequential bilingual children.

The objective of this study was to ascertain the effects of competitive noise on second language perception skills of sequentially bilingual children and to compare the results with those relating to matched monolingual peers. Fifteen bilingual immigrant children (aged 6-10 years) (BL) learning through their second language (L2), which was Italian, were matched with 15 peers who only spoke Italian (IO). All immigrant children had arrived in Italy and were exposed to L2 after their 4th year of life. The speech-to-noise ratio (SNR) needed to obtain 50% intelligibility - the speech reception threshold (SRT) - for Italian words was measured against the Italian version of ICRA noise, using an adaptive method. Moreover, presentation of phrases against a contralateral continuous discourse (informational masking) was carried out to exclude possible biases due to differences in memory, attention, or other central auditory processing disorders between groups. The SNR was -2.7 dB (SD 1.7; range: -5.5 to + 0.9) for the BL group and -5.3 dB (SD 2.3; range: -8.8 to -0.9) for the IO group (p < 0.01). With contralateral continuous discourse presentation the SNR were -32.8 dB (SD 2.4; range: -36.1 to -28.2) for the BL group and -27.8 dB (SD 2.1; range: -31.7 to -24.1) for the OI group (p < 0.01). Even sequential bilingual individuals exposed to L2 at 4 years old had worse speech perception in noise than their matched IO peers. On the other hand, the BL group demonstrated superior divided attention skills in tests with competitive contralateral discourse (p < 0.01).

Cochlear implantation in post-lingually deafened adults and elderly patients: analysis of audiometric and speech perception outcomes during the first year of use.

The aim of this study was to analyse audiometric and speech perception outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI) in adult and elderly patients in the first year post-CI activation. We evaluated 42 subjects who underwent CI at the Otorhinolaryngological Clinic of Padua Hospital. The subjects enrolled were post-lingually deafened patients who were unilaterally implanted for bilateral, severe-to-profound hearing loss. The overall sample was divided into three groups according to the age at the time of implantation: group A (35-49 years), group B (50-64 years) and group C (≥ 65 years). The subjects were assessed, both before and after surgery (at months 1, 3, 6 and 12), using pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry and speech perception tests and the CAP questionnaire. Statistical analysis of outcomes was using a Student's t-test for paired data. In all study groups a significant improvement was demonstrated in auditory performance examinations post-CI compared to the pre-operative scores. All subjects in all age groups obtained significant improvements in PTA scores before surgery and post-CI activation. Comparison of PTA values among the three age groups did not reveal any significant difference. Considerable improvement was obtained even in the speech audiometry thresholds in all groups at follow-up, with no significant differences between groups. The speech perception examination and CAP questionnaire showed good progress in all study groups, although younger patients tended to achieve more complex categories than older ones. In conclusion, CI is an effective treatment for severe-to-profound hearing loss with no significant differences in auditory performances between older and younger CI recipients. Even if somewhat slower, subjects older than 65 reached good performance and therefore are good candidates for a cochlear implant.