Effectiveness of fosfomycin tromethamine prophylaxis in preventing infection following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy: Results from a large Canadian cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Rates of infection following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSPB) are increasing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of fosfomycin tromethamine (FMT) prophylaxis in preventing post-TRUSPB infectious complications. METHODS: This nested case-control study included patients undergoing TRUSPB in a Canadian tertiary-care hospital who developed post-TRUSPB bacteraemia or urinary tract infection. Four prophylaxis periods were defined: (i) ciprofloxacin, low-resistance period (CIPRO-LOW), 2002-2009; (ii) ciprofloxacin, high-resistance period (CIPRO-HIGH), 2010-October 2013; (iii) oral FMT, one dose (FOSFO1), December 2013-September 2015; and (iv) oral FMT, two doses (FOSFO2), November 2015-June 2016. Incidence rates of the infection were calculated. RESULTS: TRUSPB (n=9391) resulted in 138 cases of urinary sepsis (58% with bacteraemia). The incidence rates were 1.8% (CIPRO-HIGH), 3.5% (FOSFO1; P=0.004 vs. CIPRO-HIGH) and 2.7% (FOSFO2; P=0.19 vs. CIPRO-HIGH). Although Escherichia coli remained the predominant pathogen with fosfomycin-based regimens, the proportion of infections caused by Klebsiella spp. was higher (20/66; 30.3%) than with ciprofloxacin-based regimens (2/77; 2.6%; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Independent risk factors for infection were the prophylactic regimen administered, presence of urological co-morbidities and diabetes. FMT was therefore not an effective alternative to ciprofloxacin for preventing post-TRUSPB urinary sepsis. These results highlight the need for novel antibacterial prophylaxis approaches.

Efficacy of Secondary Prophylaxis With Vancomycin for Preventing Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infections.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) who are re-exposed to antibiotics have a high likelihood of recurrence. We aimed to determine whether oral vancomycin as secondary prophylaxis reduces the risk of recurrence in patients recently diagnosed with CDI who undergo subsequent antibiotic exposure (CDI-AE). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with CDI (initial episode or recurrence) between 2003 and 2011 in two tertiary care centers in Quebec, Canada and who received antibiotics not targeted against CDI within 90 days after their CDI diagnosis. Risk factors for subsequent recurrence after this exposure to antibiotics were assessed through Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: We included 551 episodes of CDI-AE (379 initial episodes, 172 recurrences). Recurrence occurred after exposure to antibiotics in 181 episodes (32.9%). Recurrence was more likely in older patients (for each additional year of age: adjusted hazard ratio (AHR), 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-1.03; P=0.02) and among cases where the CDI-AE episode was itself a first (AHR, 3.59; 95% CI, 2.52-5.13; P<0.0001) or a second recurrence (AHR, 4.88; 95% CI, 3.38-7.06; P<0.0001). Oral vancomycin prophylaxis decreased the risk of further recurrence in patients whose CDI-AE itself was a recurrence (AHR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.32-0.69; P<0.0001) but not in those whose CDI-AE was an initial episode (AHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.57-1.45; P=0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Oral vancomycin appears as an effective strategy for decreasing the risk of further CDI recurrence in patients with a history of recurrent CDI who are re-exposed to antibiotics.