RESUMO
The rapid introduction of new information and communication technologies into medical practice has prompted Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic SurgeryR to publish a position paper on sleep-disordered breathing, especially in relation to positive pressure treatment. It should be pointed out that the scientific literature is to some extent controversial due to a paucity of large randomized multicenter studies with long-term follow-up. Moreover, the telematics devices and systems on the market vary widely. As a result, the recommendations are based primarily on a consensus of expert professionals. Another very important aspect addressed extensively in this document is the obvious lack of regulations on legal matters and the operations of commercial companies. The most important recommendations included in this position paper are that telemedicine is primarily advocated in subjects with travel problems or who live far from the hospital, in patients with poor CPAP compliance, and in most cases treated with non-invasive mechanical ventilation. A key element is patient individualization. It is imperative that the relevant technical, legal and ethical requirements (medical device regulations, data protection, and informed consent) are met. Finally, expert professionals from our society must contribute to and become involved in spearheading this technological change.
Assuntos
Pneumologia , Síndromes da Apneia do Sono , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono , Cirurgia Torácica , Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas , Humanos , Respiração Artificial , Síndromes da Apneia do Sono/terapiaRESUMO
Flow limitation during sleep occurs when the rise in esophageal pressure is not accompanied by a flow increase which results in a non-rounded inspiratory flow shape. Short periods of flow limitation ending in an arousal or in a fall in SaO2 (hypopnea or upper airway resistance syndrome) are detrimental but the role of prolonged periods of flow limitation (PPFL) has not yet been clarified. This is important not only for diagnosis but also for nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration, especially for the automatic devices that need to be setup. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of PPFL. We compared the behavior of the mean end-expiratory systemic blood pressure (SBP), end-tidal CO2, esophageal pressure and the pattern of breathing during a period of normal breathing at optimal (CPAP) and during PPFL at suboptimal CPAP in 14 patients with sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome during a full polysomnography CPAP titration. The mean values of the parameters studied, at optimal and suboptimal CPAP were (1) SBP 92+/-13 vs. 91+/-15 mmHg (P: ns). At suboptimal CPAP, swings of blood pressure were associated with changes in pleural pressure; (2) SaO2 97.5+/-1.2 vs. 96.5+/-1.6 (P: 0.03), (3) end-tidal CO2 43.5+/-4 vs. 49.5+/-4 (P:0.001); (4) oesophageal pressure, 10.5+/-4 vs. 37.6+/-15 cmH2O (P:0.001) and (5) pattern of breathing: minute ventilation 6.6+/-1.4 vs. 6.1+/-1.2L/min (P: ns) and inspiratory time 1.24+/-0.3 vs. 1.66+/-0.4s (P:0.001). It can be concluded that PPFL induces significant physiological changes. Nevertheless, given the scant literature, clinical studies are warranted to elucidate the clinical role of these physiological changes.