Fertility managment in testicular cancer: the need to establish a standardized and evidence-based patient-centric pathway.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present paper was to determine the impact of testicular cancer (TC) and its treatments on fertility and to review the current management options for the infertile patient with TC, both before diagnosis and after treatment, with the aim of providing practical recommendations to update contemporary guidelines and standardize clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Searches were conducted for relevant articles on Pubmed and Google Scholar between 2000 and 2017, with additional articles sourced from reference lists of included publications. RESULTS: At time of diagnosis, 6-24% of patients with TC were reported to be azoospermic and 50% oligozoospermic. Without conducting semen analysis at diagnosis, these patients cannot be identified and may be at further risk of subfertility. Gonadotoxic therapies cause an overall decrease in male fertility by 30% and there is currently no method to predict which patients will become azoospermic after treatment. Patients with larger, more invasive tumours, however, are at greater risk of infertility from local tumour effects, and are also more likely to undergo several different type of therapy, which has further detrimental effects on conception rates. Most treatment-induced infertility recovers 2 years post-treatment, but paternity can be delayed during a couple's peak reproductive years. Semen cryopreservation remains the procedure of choice in preserving fertility, but the service is underused, with only 24% of patients banking sperm. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) at the time of orchidectomy (onco-microTESE) is a successful infertility treatment option for those found to be azoospermic or severely oligozoospermic at diagnosis, while microTESE may still retrieve sperm in azoospermic patients after chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The underutilisation of semen analysis and sperm cryopreservation results in the failure to identify the azoospermic or severely oligozoospermic patient at diagnosis who may benefit from fertility-preserving procedures, for example, onco-microTESE at the time of orchidectomy. Fertility preservation and counselling needs to be broached earlier in the TC treatment pathway and made a greater priority. Given the advances in treatment, more patients with TC are surviving and looking to return to a normal life. Preserving their future fertility plays an important role in achieving this.

Fertility preservation in testicular cancer - predictors of spermatogenesis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of spermatogenesis in patients with testicular cancer and to assess for any predictors of spermatogenesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 103 testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs) in men who underwent radical orchidectomy conducted at Guy's Hospital, London, between 2011 and 2015. Primary outcome measures included: the presence and characteristics of spermatogenesis (widespread/focal/proximity to tumour). Secondary outcome measures included: the presence of testicular microlithiasis, tumour characteristics (size, stage, and type), and tumour markers. Secondary outcome measures as potential predictors of spermatogenesis were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Spermatogenesis was present in 70% (72/103) of the patients; it was widespread in 63% (45/72) and focal in 38% (27/72). Neither tumour type, stage, presence of microcalcification nor tumour markers predicted spermatogenesis. Men with a percentage testis tumour occupation (PTTO) of >50% of their testis were 82% (95% confidence interval 73.2-98.4) less likely to have spermatogenesis than a PTTO of <50%. CONCLUSIONS: Spermatogenesis is present in most testes affected by TGCTs; it is widespread in two-thirds of patients, and located away from the tumour in 94%. These findings can help predict and guide successful surgical sperm retrieval in testes with TGCTs. The finding of focal spermatogenesis in a third of patients would support a microsurgical approach to sperm retrieval at the time of orchidectomy to maximise success.