Psychosocial adjustment in adolescents who have used cochlear implants since preschool.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined psychosocial characteristics of students who had used a cochlear implant (CI) since preschool and were evaluated when they were in elementary grades and again in high school. The study had four goals: (1) to determine the extent to which psychosocial skills documented in elementary grades were maintained into high school; (2) to assess the extent to which long-term CI users identified with the Deaf community or the hearing world or both; (3) to examine the association between group identification and the student's sense of self-esteem, preferred communication mode, and spoken language skills; and (4) to describe the extracurricular world of the teenagers who were mainstreamed with hearing age-mates for most of their academic experience. DESIGN: As part of a larger study, 112 CI students (aged 15.0 to 18.6 yrs) or their parents completed questionnaires describing their social skills, and a subsample of 107 CI students completed group identification and self-esteem questionnaires. Results were compared with either a control group of hearing teenagers (N = 46) or age-appropriate hearing norms provided by the assessment developer. RESULTS: Average psychosocial ratings from both parents and students at both elementary grades and high school indicated a positive self-image throughout the school years. Seventy percent of the adolescents expressed either strong identification with the hearing community (32%) or mixed identification with both deaf and hearing communities (38%). Almost all CI students (95%) were mainstreamed for more than half of the day, and the majority of students (85%) were in the appropriate grade for their age. Virtually all CI students (98%) reported having hearing friends, and a majority reported having deaf friends. More than 75% of CI students reported that they used primarily spoken language to communicate and that good spoken language skills enabled them to participate more fully in all aspects of their lives. Identification with the hearing world was not associated with personal or social adjustment problems but was associated with better speech perception and English language skill. Ninety-four percent were active participants in high school activities and sports, and 50% held part-time jobs (a rate similar to that documented for hearing teens). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of these early-implanted adolescents reported strong social skills, high self-esteem, and at least mixed identification with the hearing world. However, these results must be viewed in light of possible sources of sample selection bias and may not represent the psychosocial characteristics of the entire population of children receiving CIs.

Epilogue: factors contributing to long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in early childhood.

OBJECTIVES: This report focuses on how speech perception, speech production, language, and literacy performance in adolescence are influenced by a common set of predictor variables obtained during elementary school in a large group of teenagers using cochlear implants (CIs). DESIGN: Time-lag analyses incorporating seven common predictor variables associated with the elementary school test period were evaluated. The elementary school-age variables included five contributors across the performance domains: gender, performance intelligence quotient, family size, socioeconomic status, and duration of deafness (operationally defined as the time period between the age of implantation and the onset of deafness). Regression analyses then examined how communication mode in early elementary grades influenced skills exhibited in high school and how this influence was mediated by information capacity of immediate memory. RESULTS: High correlations occurred between outcome measures collected at CI-E session and similar measures collected at CI-HS (values ranging from 0.75 to 0.83), indicating that the relative standing of individuals on these outcomes is highly stable over time. The best performers in elementary grades exhibit the best outcomes in high school, and early difficulties tend to persist throughout the elementary and high school years. The most highly related outcome areas were language and reading/literacy (values ranging from 0.74 to 0.88). These skills seem closely linked, and CI children who demonstrate the best vocabulary and syntax skills in elementary grades achieved the highest literacy performance in high school. Speech perception and speech production skills are also highly correlated with one another (r = 0.69 to 0.87), suggesting that the most direct result of improved auditory input from a CI is the child's ability to produce intelligible speech. The lowest correlations are observed between reading/literacy and speech perception (r = 0.30 to 0.54) or speech production (values ranging from 0.31 to 0.58). CI-E verbal rehearsal speed is an independent and powerful predictor of each early performance outcome, accounting for between 13% and 30% of the variance in early outcomes above and beyond that accounted for by gender, family size, socioeconomic status, performance intelligence quotient, duration of deafness, and the CI-E sign enhancement ratio. Group mean scores for language, reading, and social adjustment were generally within an SD of normative samples of typically developing age-mates with normal hearing. CONCLUSIONS: Use of sign to enhance spoken communication negatively influenced verbal rehearsal speed, which was a strong predictor of all early outcomes, which in turn strongly influenced later outcomes. These analyses suggest that early communication mode exerts a powerful influence on early outcomes that persist into later years. Speech perception, speech intelligibility, language, literacy, and psychosocial adjustment far exceeded that reported for similar groups before the advent of CI technology.

Spoken language scores of children using cochlear implants compared to hearing age-mates at school entry.

This study investigated three questions: Is it realistic to expect age-appropriate spoken language skills in children with cochlear implants (CIs) who received auditory-oral intervention during the preschool years? What characteristics predict successful spoken language development in this population? Are children with CIs more proficient in some areas of language than others? We analyzed language skills of 153 children with CIs as measured by standardized tests. These children (mean age = 5 years and 10 months) attended programs in the United States (N = 39) that used an auditory-oral educational approach. Age-appropriate scores were observed in 50% of the children on measures of receptive vocabulary, 58% on expressive vocabulary, 46% on verbal intelligence, 47% on receptive language, and 39% on expressive language. Regression analysis indicated that, after controlling for the effects of nonverbal intelligence and parent education level, children who received their implants at young ages had higher scores on all language tests than children who were older at implantation. On average, children with CIs performed better on certain language measures than others, indicating that some areas of language may be more difficult for these children to master than others. Implications for educators of deaf children with CIs are discussed.

Estimating the Influence of Cochlear Implantation on Language Development in Children.

Research studies reviewed here have identified a wide variety of factors that may influence a child's auditory, speech and language development following cochlear implantation. Intrinsic characteristics of the implanted child, including gender, family socio-economic status, age at onset of hearing loss and pre-implant residual hearing may predispose a child to greater or lesser post-implant benefit. Intervention characteristics that may influence outcome include age of the child when deafness is identified and amplification and habilitation is initiated, the communication mode used with the child and the type of classroom/therapy employed. Characteristics of the implant itself include generation of technology used, the age of the child when implant stimulation is initiated, and the amount of time the child has used the implant. These factors interact in unpredictable ways, so that isolated correlations between predictor variables and outcome scores may be difficult to interpret. Results for two independent samples of orally-educated children tested by different laboratories were compared using multiple regression analysis to illustrate interactions among predictor variables. Four predictor variables accounted for a similar proportion of variance (23% and 24%) in receptive vocabulary (PPVT) outcome scores in each sample. A unique predictor was then added to each analysis. The addition of pre-implant aided threshold not only increased the total variance accounted for to almost 40%, but also increased the effect of implant age as a predictor variable. A different result was observed in the other sample, were the added predictor variable was nonverbal IQ, where the estimated contribution of implant age was reduced. The current analysis suggests that future analyses minimally control for independent contributions of implant age, nonverbal IQ, and pre-implant aided thresholds when examining expected outcomes. Children in both samples who received a cochlear implant sometime between their first and second birthday achieved age-appropriate oral receptive vocabulary levels during preschool.

The effect of GJB2 allele variants on performance after cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: It has been hypothesized that etiology of hearing loss may serve as an independent variable in performance after cochlear implantation. To test this hypothesis, the authors identified pediatric cochlear implant recipients with gap junction protein beta2 (GJB2)-related deafness. The study examines performance outcomes associated with GJB2 deafness-causing allele variants. STUDY DESIGN: Pediatric cochlear implant patients were screened for GJB2 allele variants; statistical comparisons were made with prospectively obtained performance measures. METHODS: From 181 children who participated in a nationwide cochlear implant research program, 122 children were identified with congenital nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss and invited to participate. Screening for GJB2 allele variants was completed for 55 children. The children were homogeneous with respect to age (8 or 9 y) and age at implant (before age 5 y). All patients have previously undergone a prospective regimented battery of performance measures. RESULTS: Performance measures were compared between 22 children with and 33 children without mutations to determine whether GJB2 status was a significant predictor of cochlear implant outcomes. Reading and cognitive outcomes were significantly dependent on connexin status. The group of children who tested positive for GJB2-related deafness scored significantly higher on a nonverbal cognitive measure, Block Design, and on a measure of reading comprehension. CONCLUSION: The isolated insult to the cochlea created by GJB2 allele variants allows for preservation of central cognitive function. Better reading performance is seen in children with GJB2-related deafness.