Perspectives on perioperative management of children's surgical conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic in low-income and middle-income countries: a global survey.

Background: Many organizations have issued recommendations to limit elective surgery during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We surveyed providers of children's surgical care working in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) to understand their perspectives on surgical management in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and how they were subsequently modifying their surgical care practices. Methods: A survey of children's surgery providers in LMICs was performed. Respondents reported how their perioperative practice had changed in response to COVID-19. They were also presented with 26 specific procedures and asked which of these procedures they were allowed to perform and which they felt they should be allowed to perform. Changes in surgical practice reported by respondents were analyzed thematically. Results: A total of 132 responses were obtained from 120 unique institutions across 30 LMICs. 117/120 institutions (97.5%) had issued formal guidance on delaying or limiting elective children's surgical procedures. Facilities in LICs were less likely to have issued guidance on elective surgery compared with middle-income facilities (82% in LICs vs 99% in lower middle-income countries and 100% in upper middle-income countries, p=0.036). Although 122 (97%) providers believed cases should be limited during a global pandemic, there was no procedure where more than 61% of providers agreed cases should be delayed or canceled. Conclusions: There is little consensus on which procedures should be limited or delayed among LMIC providers. Expansion of testing capacity and local, context-specific guidelines may be a better strategy than international consensus, given the disparities in availability of preoperative testing and the lack of consensus towards which procedures should be delayed.

An Inpatient Child Passenger Safety program.

Background. Our institution implemented an Inpatient Child Passenger Safety (CPS) program for hospitalized children to improve knowledge and compliance with the Massachusetts CPS law, requiring children less than 8 years old or 57 inches tall to be secured in a car seat when in a motor vehicle. Methods. After the Inpatient CPS Program was piloted on 3 units in 2009, the program was expanded to all inpatient units in 2010. A computerized nursing assessment tool identifies children in need of a CPS consult for education and/or car seat. Results. With the expanded Inpatient CPS Program, 3650 children have been assessed, 598 consults initiated, and 325 families have received CPS education. Car seats were distributed to 419 children; specialty car seats were loaned to 134 families. Conclusions. With a multidisciplinary approach, we implemented an Inpatient CPS Program for hospitalized children providing CPS education and car seats to families in need.

The modern paediatric injury pyramid: injuries in Massachusetts children and adolescents.

The objective of this study was to develop a modern version of the paediatric injury pyramid, a visual classification of injury severity, and to present mechanism-based pyramids. As the original paediatric injury pyramid was described in 1980, the injury epidemiology from 1980 was compared with 2004. Comprehensive emergency department, hospital discharge and death data for Massachusetts in 2004 were used to determine injury rates for residents aged 0-19 years. Injury pyramids were constructed on the basis of the number of injuries resulting in death, hospitalisations and emergency department visits. In 2004, unintentional and intentional injuries accounted for 197 deaths, 7120 hospitalisations and 199,814 emergency department visits giving a ratio of 1:36:1014. The 2004 injury pyramids differed by mechanism and intent. Compared with 1980, there were lower rates for overall injury and for most major injury mechanisms in Massachusetts in 2004.

Variation in the management of pediatric splenic injuries in the United States.

BACKGROUND: This study examines the existence and sources of variation in the management of pediatric splenic injuries among hospitals in the United States and the factors associated with splenectomy. METHODS: Information on children 15 years of age and younger with a splenic injury diagnosis code was extracted from the Kids' Inpatient Database 2000, a pediatric inpatient database of 2,784 hospitals in 27 states covering 72% of the nation's population for the year 2000. Patient variables included age, sex, race, injury diagnoses, grade of splenic injury, splenic procedure code, and calculated Injury Severity Score. Hospital variables included pediatric status (free-standing, unit and adult), teaching status, annual pediatric splenic trauma volume, and national region. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to predict the factors associated with splenectomy based upon patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: In all, 2,191 children with splenic injuries were identified; 253 (12%) underwent splenectomy. The crude rate of splenectomy varied significantly among pediatric hospital types: 3% (11/339) at freestanding children's hospitals, 9% (45/525) at unit hospitals and 15% (197/1327) at adult hospitals (p < 0.001). Risk of splenectomy increased with the grade of splenic injury, patient age, and the presence of multiple injuries. Teaching hospitals and hospitals with higher patient volume were associated with lower risk for splenectomy. There was no relationship between splenectomy and gender, race, or national region. Despite adjustment for the above noted hospital and patient-specific variables, children treated at an adult hospital had 2.8 times the odds, and those treated at a unit pediatric hospital 2.6 times the odds, of undergoing splenectomy as those cared for at a free-standing pediatric hospital (p = 0.003 and 0.013, respectively). CONCLUSION: Nationally, children cared for at freestanding pediatric hospitals have a significantly lower risk of splenectomy than children treated at either adult hospitals or pediatric hospitals within an adult hospital. This may have implications for education, trauma triage and the establishment of practice guidelines.