Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency after bariatric surgery: a bariatric surgery center of excellence experience.

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea, bloating, abdominal pain, and nausea are common after bariatric surgery (BS) and can lead to significant morbidity. While many diagnoses can explain these symptoms, post-bariatric exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) is becoming increasingly recognized as contributor to gastrointestinal symptoms. The frequency and outcomes of EPI after BS are not well understood. We investigated the prevalence and outcomes of EPI over 18 years at a tertiary bariatric referral center. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent primary or revisional BS from 2002 to 2020 was performed. Patients were included if they were suspected of having EPI or underwent fecal elastase testing (FE-1). EPI diagnosis was defined as positive FE-1 testing or improvement with empiric pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT). RESULTS: EPI was suspected in 261 patients, and 190 were tested via FE-1 (89.5%) or empirically treated (10.5%). EPI was diagnosed in 79 (41.6%) patients and was associated with older age and lower BMI. Therapeutic PERT was given to 65 patients diagnosed with EPI, and 56 (86.2%) patients reported improved symptoms. Patients who underwent RYGB and BPD-DS were more likely to have EPI than those after SG (47.9% and 70.0% vs 17.4%, p < 0.01). EPI diagnosis was associated with a history chronic pancreatitis. While diarrhea and abdominal pain were the most common symptoms prompting FE-1 testing, no symptoms were significantly associated with EPI. EPI was also associated with abnormal fecal fat results and treatment with bile acid sequestrants, but not small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. CONCLUSION: This study highlights that exocrine pancreatic insufficiency can account to for previously unexplained GI complaints after bariatric surgery. Therefore, bariatric surgery programs should consider this diagnosis in symptomatic patients, especially following RYGB and BPD-DS. Further work to define patient factors that should prompt evaluation, optimal treatment, and prevention is necessary.

Needs assessment for patient-centered education and outcome metrics in robotic surgery.

BACKGROUND: From clinical experience, many patients undergoing robotic assisted surgery (RAS) have a poor understanding of the technology. To ensure informed consent and appropriate expectations, a needs assessment for patient-centered education and outcome metrics in RAS is warranted. Our goal was to perform an assessment of patient understanding, comfort with robotic technology, and ability to obtain critical information from their surgeon when undergoing RAS. METHODS: Twenty patients planned for RAS by three surgeons were asked to complete a six-item Likert agreement scale survey prior to signing informed consent. The study coordinator administered surveys, while the surgeon left the room. Indicator statements were crafted to reduce bias and two-way evaluated for consistency. The surgeons were additionally asked their perception of each patient's understanding and comfort with RAS. Frequency statistics and tendencies were analyzed. RESULTS: Surgeons strongly agreed all patients appropriately understood how RAS functioned and would ask more questions before signing consent, if needed. Patients were predominately not familiar with RAS and felt surgeons did not explain how RAS worked. There was wide variability on if patients understood how RAS worked for their treatment. Overall, patients were not completely comfortable with RAS for their care, did not understand the risks of RAS compared to other approaches, and did not feel their surgeon understood what they needed to know to make informed decisions. CONCLUSIONS: This needs assessment demonstrated critical gaps in patient knowledge about RAS, surgeon communication skills, and the ability of surgeons to know what was important from the patient perspective. The development of RAS patient-centered education and outcome metrics could help address these gaps.

Routine chest X-rays after pigtail chest tube removal rarely change management in children.

BACKGROUND: The need for chest X-rays (CXR) following large-bore chest tube removal has been questioned; however, the utility of CXRs following removal of small-bore pigtail chest tubes is unknown. We hypothesized that CXRs obtained following removal of pigtail chest tubes would not change management. METHODS: Patients < 18 years old with pigtail chest tubes placed 2014-2019 at a tertiary children's hospital were reviewed. Exclusion criteria were age < 1 month, death or transfer with a chest tube in place, or pigtail chest tube replacement by large-bore chest tube. The primary outcome was chest tube reinsertion. RESULTS: 111 patients underwent 123 pigtail chest tube insertions; 12 patients had bilateral chest tubes. The median age was 5.8 years old. Indications were pneumothorax (n = 53), pleural effusion (n = 54), chylothorax (n = 6), empyema (n = 5), and hemothorax (n = 3). Post-pull CXRs were obtained in 121/123 cases (98.4%). The two children without post-pull CXRs did not require chest tube reinsertion. Two patients required chest tube reinsertion (1.6%), both for re-accumulation of their chylothorax. CONCLUSIONS: Post-pull chest X-rays are done nearly universally following pigtail chest tube removal but rarely change management. Providers should obtain post-pull imaging based on symptoms and underlying diagnosis, with higher suspicion for recurrence in children with chylothorax.

An Analysis of Essential Pediatric Surgical Cases Encountered During a Decade of Large-Scale Military Humanitarian Aid Missions.

INTRODUCTION: Disease Control Priorities, 3rd Edition (DCP3) is an evidence-based, published resource that outlines essential procedures recommended for developing health care systems. These systems must consider various populations and the incidence of certain surgical conditions that require treatment. In relation to pediatric patients, the prevalence of certain surgical conditions encountered remains unclear in several low- and middle-income countries. Over the past 15 years, the USNS Mercy, one of the U.S. Navy's large hospital ships, has led the Pacific Partnership missions, which provide large-scale humanitarian aid throughout Southeast Asia. The data collected during these missions provide an opportunity to analyze the scope of pediatric operations performed in resource-limited countries. This analysis may assist in future planning for specific needs during military humanitarian missions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surgical case data were prospectively collected during the six Pacific Partnership missions from 2006 to 2018. Demographic data were analyzed for all patients ≤8 years of age who underwent an operation. These data were retrospectively reviewed and all case logs were categorized by mission year, procedure-type, and host nation. Operations were classified based on 44 essential operations delineated in DCP3. Primary outcome was incidence of DCP3 essential operations. Secondary outcomes were perioperative complications. Standard statistical methods were performed for descriptive analysis. RESULTS: A total of 3,209 major and minor operations were performed during 24 port visits in nine countries. Pediatric cases represented 1,117 (38%) of these procedures. Pediatric surgeons performed 291 (26%) of these cases. Based on DCP3 criteria, 789 pediatric operations (71%) were considered essential procedures. The most common DCP3-aligned procedures were cleft lip repair (432, 57%), hernia repair (207, 27%), and hydrocelectomy (60, 8%). Operative volume for pediatric surgery was highest during the 2008 mission (522 cases), when two pediatric surgeons were deployed, and lowest during the 2018 mission (five cases), when the mission focus was on education rather than surgical procedures and lack of pediatric cases referred by the host nation. Overall complication rate for pediatric cases was 1%. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest known analysis of military humanitarian assistance. Pediatric operations represented over one-third of the surgical volume during Pacific Partnership missions from 2006 to 2018. The majority of cases were DCP3-aligned and associated with a low complication rate. Future humanitarian aid missions and host nations should allocate appropriate medical and educational resources to treat DCP3 pediatric surgical diseases in low- and middle-income countries to support long-term capacity building while maintaining optimal surgical outcomes.

Familiarity with and uptake of alternative methods to control sheep gastro-intestinal parasites on farms in England.

A questionnaire was distributed electronically amongst sheep farmers in England; it aimed to provide a quantification of current anthelmintic practices, farmer awareness of the issue of anthelmintic resistance (AR) and the uptake, awareness and opinions surrounding conventional and alternative methods of nematode control. The majority of farmers relied on several anthelmintics and used faecal egg counts to identify worm problems. Although farmers were aware of the issue of AR amongst helminth parasites in the UK, there was a disconnection between such awareness and on farm problems and practice of nematode control. Grazing management was used by 52% of responders, while breeding for resistance and bioactive forages by 22 and 18% respectively. Farms with more than 500 ewes, and farmers who felt nematodes were a problem, had a higher probability of using selective breeding. Farmers who considered their wormer effective, had a qualification in agriculture and whose staff did not include any family members, were more likely to use bioactive forages; the opposite was the case if farmers dosed their lambs frequently. Amongst the alternatives, highest preference was for selective breeding and vaccination, if the latter was to become commercially available, with more respondents having a preference for breeding than actually using it. Several barriers to the uptake of an alternative were identified, the most influential factor being the cost to set it up and the length of time for which it would remain effective. The disconnection between awareness of AR and practice of nematode control on farm reinforces the need for emphasising the links between the causes of AR and the consequences of strategies to address its challenge.