Abruptio placentae associated with misoprostol use in women with preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate complications associated with cervical ripening with vaginal administration of misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal inserts in women with preeclampsia. preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of patients with preeclampsia undergoing cervical ripening with vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal inserts prior to labor induction. RESULTS: Among 203 patients with preeclampsia undergoing cervical ripening prior to induction, 95 received vaginal misoprostol, and 108 received dinoprostone. The incidence of uterine hyperstimulation requiring medical therapy and the need for emergency cesarean section due tofetal heart rate abnormalities were significantly higher among patients receiving misoprostol (22.1% versus 12.0%, p = 0.04, and 17.9% versus 8.3%, p = 0.03, respectively). The overall incidence of abruptio placentae was 7.4%, with a significantly higher incidence among those receiving misoprostol as compared to dinoprostone (13.7% versus 1.9%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Among patients with preeclampsia undergoing cervical ripening prior to labor induction, there is a higher incidence of acute intrapartum complications (uterine hyperstimulation, cesarean section for fetal heart rate abnormalities and abruptio placentae) with vaginal misoprostol, as compared to dinoprostone, vaginal insert.

Antibiotic therapy in preterm premature rupture of membranes: Are seven days necessary? A preliminary, randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether 3 days of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, which is intended to prolong latency in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes, is comparable to 7 days of therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes at three separate study sites were asked to participate in this intent-to-treat, prospective, randomized trial. They were assigned randomly to either 3 or 7 days of ampicillin-sulbactam (3 g intravenously every 6 hours). The primary outcome of interest was the latency period from membrane rupture to delivery. RESULTS: Forty-two individuals were enrolled in each group. No difference was noted in the latency interval between the two groups (3 days, 214 +/- 225 hours, vs 7 days, 229 +/- 218 hours). A significantly higher number of patients in the 3-day group completed therapy (80.1% vs 47.6%, P =.003). No other parameters were significantly different between the two groups. No adverse events or trends were noted in either group. CONCLUSION: There appears to be no difference in the latency period between 3 and 7 days of ampicillin-sulbactam antibiotic therapy. More patients are needed to exclude a type II error.