Symptom experiences of critically-ill hematologic malignancy patients: A scoping review.

CONTEXT: Critically-ill patients with hematologic malignancies are increasingly admitted to intensive care units globally. Unrelieved symptoms during intensive care treatment may contribute to poor outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To better understand the symptom experience(s) for critically-ill patients with hematologic malignancies. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted searching Medline, CINAHL, PychInfo, Embase, and ProQuest databases, the Cochrane Library, and the grey literature between January 1st, 1990 and July 15th, 2020. Two authors independently reviewed articles for inclusion and verified abstracted data. RESULTS: Seventeen articles met inclusion criteria, including 11 cohort studies, 1 case-control study, and five review articles. No qualitative or mixed-method studies were retrieved. Symptoms were reported as the primary outcome across two studies (17%). Reported hematologic malignancy subtypes included leukemia and/or myelodysplastic syndrome (9, 53%), lymphoma (8, 47%), multiple myeloma (7, 41%), and aplastic anemia (2, 12%). The principal indication for ICU admission was respiratory failure, followed by cardiogenic shock/cardiac failure, endocrine disturbances, sepsis, and neurological failure. Only one study used validated tools for evaluating symptoms. Thirty-four symptoms were reported: altered level of consciousness/coma (35%); diarrhea (35%); nausea (35%); dyspnea (35%); vomiting (29%); and pain (29%). Two articles (13%) identified symptom clusters. CONCLUSION: There is minimal research that measures and explores the symptom experiences of critically-ill patients with hematologic malignancies. New research in this domain is needed to inform targeted symptom care for this vulnerable patient population.

Profiles and service utilization for children accessing a mental health walk-in clinic versus usual care.

Many children and adolescents with mental health problems do not receive the treatment they need. Unmet need raises questions about specific barriers that may prevent service use, and/or the characteristics of children and families who are less likely to receive care. Brief interventions or single-session psychotherapy delivered in a highly accessible manner are methods of addressing the problems associated with waitlists and limited access to care. In the current study the authors offer an exploratory evaluation of the West End Walk-In Counseling Centre for children and youth with psychosocial problems. Children 4 to 18 years of age who accessed the Walk-In Counseling Centre and a comparison group of clients who accessed usual care were assessed at intake, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up on demographic characteristics, behavioral/emotional adjustment and functioning, client satisfaction, and service use. Children in the walk-in group had more severe behavioral/emotional adjustment and functioning than usual care clients at baseline. At post-treatment, walk-in clients had lower scores on Total Mental Health Problems and Internalizing Behaviors, and exhibited fewer problems across all scales at follow-up. Walk-in clients found the wait time for service more reasonable and at follow-up, felt the service addressed concerns and had higher regard for counselor availability and cultural sensitivity of the service than usual care clients. Service utilization, assessed at post-treatment and 3-month follow-up, showed that both groups were more likely to access mental health and education services rather than health or child welfare services, and were more likely to have used services in the 12 months prior to service than the 3 months following service completion. Walk-in clients had steeper rates of improvement compared to usual care clients despite equivalence in psychosocial functioning at baseline. The walk-in model may be an effective alternative to usual care, particularly for those clients only willing to wait up to 2 weeks for service.