Predictive Algorithm for Thiopurine-Induced Hepatotoxicity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 25% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) discontinue azathioprine (AZA) or mercaptopurine (MP) therapy within 3 months of treatment initiation because of adverse drug reactions. Of these side-effects, about half are because of hepatotoxicity. The aim of this study was to validate and (subsequently) optimize a previously reported predictive algorithm for thiopurine-associated hepatotoxicity by increasing the number of patients with IBD benefitting from conventional thiopurine therapy. METHODS: This multicenter observational study included consecutive thiopurine-naive patients with IBD who received AZA or MP treatment. The primary outcome was hepatotoxicity within 12 weeks. The patients with and without hepatotoxicity were compared. Four determinants, namely, age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide concentrations 1 week after treatment initiation (T = 1) were used to validate and optimize 2 (1 dichotomous and 1 continuous) algorithms using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 229 patients, 21 (9%) developed hepatotoxicity and 93% of the patients received MP with a median dose of 0.7 mg/kg (95% confidence interval 0.3-1.4 mg/kg). A difference in BMI was found between with and without hepatotoxicity groups (median 27.6 versus 24.2, P = 0.022). Specificities of 68% (Algorithm 1) and 77% (Algorithm 2) and sensitivities of 56% (Algorithm 1) and 50% (Algorithm 2) were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Both algorithms demonstrated limited predictive accuracy for thiopurine-induced hepatotoxicity in the validation cohort. Relevant factors contributing to this outcome were changes in thiopurine prescription behavior over time, with more MP prescriptions at relatively lower dosages of MP.

Limited added value of laboratory monitoring in thiopurine maintenance monotherapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

BACKGROUND: To timely detect myelotoxicity and hepatotoxicity, laboratory monitoring at 3-month intervals is advised throughout thiopurine maintenance treatment for IBD. However, reported incidence rates of myelotoxicity and hepatotoxicity in maintenance treatment are low. AIM: To assess incidence rates and clinical consequences of myelotoxicity and hepatotoxicity in thiopurine maintenance therapy after at least 1 year of thiopurine treatment. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of therapy adjustment for laboratory toxicity in adult IBD patients after 12 consecutive months of azathioprine (AZA) or mercaptopurine monotherapy (ie baseline) between 2000 and 2016. Incidence rates of laboratory toxicity (ie myelotoxicity [leucocyte count <4.0 × 10e9/L, and/or platelet count <150 × 10e9/L] and/or hepatotoxicity (gamma-glutamyltransferase [GGT], alkaline phosphatase [AP], ALT and/or AST above ULN, excluding isolated increased AST/AP]) and associated diagnostic procedures and complications were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 12,391 laboratory assessments were performed on 1132 patients (56% female, AZA 74%) during 3.3 years of median follow-up. Median monitoring frequency was 3.1 assessments/treatment year. Only 83/12,391 (0.7%) assessments resulted in therapy adjustment, dose reduction in 46 patients, cessation in 28 and allopurinol initiation in nine; risk of therapy adjustment was 1.9% per treatment year. Incidence rates of myelotoxicity were 7.1% (5.1% mild/1.8% moderate/0.1% severe) and hepatotoxicity 5.1% (3.8% mild/1.1% moderate/0.2% severe) per treatment year. Treatment-related complications with concurrent laboratory toxicity occurred in 12 patients (1.1%) and would not have been prevented by monitoring. CONCLUSION: Severe laboratory toxicity is uncommon after 1 year of thiopurine monotherapy at 4-month monitoring intervals. Therapy adjustments are rare after detection of laboratory toxicity. After 1 year of thiopurine monotherapy, laboratory monitoring may be lowered to less than a 4-month interval.

Real-life study of safety of thiopurine-allopurinol combination therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: myelotoxicity and hepatotoxicity rarely affect maintenance treatment.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose thiopurine-allopurinol (LDTA) combination therapy is a commonly applied optimisation strategy in IBD patients with a skewed thiopurine metabolism. AIM: To assess continued LDTA maintenance treatment at annual intervals and explore risk factors for treatment cessation METHODS: Adult IBD patients treated with LDTA between 2009 and 2016 were retrospectively included. Data on the incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events (AEs), including hepatotoxicity and myelotoxicity resulting in imposing LDTA therapy cessation and associated risk factors were collected. RESULTS: In total, 221 IBD patients (46% male, median age 42 years) were included. Maintenance LDTA treatment was continued in 78% of patients at 1 year (n = 145), 66% at 2 years (n = 83), 57% at 3 years (n = 52) and 52% at 4 years (n = 33). Treatment in patients receiving LDTA therapy for AEs during thiopurine monotherapy was more often continued than in patients initiating LDTA for other indications (eg, ineffectiveness of thiopurine monotherapy, routinely discovered skewed metabolism) (P = 0.016). Myelotoxicity during thiopurine monotherapy resolved in 87% and hepatotoxicity in 86% after median of 1.2 and 1.4 months after LDTA initiation. Cumulative incidence of AEs during LDTA resulting in therapy cessation within total follow-up of 449 treatment-years was 7% for clinical AEs, 4% for myelotoxicity and 1% for hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSION: LDTA therapy is a safe and beneficial optimisation strategy in IBD patients. Continued maintenance LDTA treatment is 52% after 4 years of treatment and most commonly affected by ineffectiveness of LDTA rather than LDTA-attributed toxicity. LDTA optimisation strategy is most advantageous in patients failing thiopurine monotherapy due to AEs.

6-methylmercaptopurine-induced leukocytopenia during thiopurine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Thiopurines have a favorable benefit-risk ratio in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. A feared adverse event of thiopurine therapy is myelotoxicity, mostly occurring due to toxic concentrations of the pharmacologically active metabolites 6-thioguaninenucleotides. In oncology, myelosuppression has also been associated with elevated 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP). In this case series, we provide a detailed overview of 6-MMP-induced myelotoxicity in inflammatory bowel disease patients. METHODS: We retrospectively scrutinized pharmacological laboratory databases of five participating centers over a 5-year period. Patients with leukocytopenia at time of elevated 6-MMP levels (>5700 pmol/8 × 108 red blood cells) were included for detailed chart review. RESULTS: In this case series, we describe demographic, clinical, and pharmacological aspects of 24 cases of 6-MMP-induced myelotoxicity on weight-based thiopurine therapy with a median steady-state 6-MMP level of 14 500 pmol/8 × 108 red blood cells (range 6600-48 000). All patients developed leukocytopenia (white blood cell count 2.7 ± 0.9 × 109 /L) after a median period of 11 weeks after initiation of thiopurine therapy (interquartile range 6-46 weeks). Eighteen patients (75%) developed concurrent anemia (median hemoglobin concentration 6.9 × 109 /L), and four patients developed concurrent thrombocytopenia (median platelet count 104 × 109 /L). Leukocytopenia resolved in 20 patients (83%) within 4 weeks upon altered thiopurine treatment regimen, and white blood cell count was increasing, but not yet normalized, in the remaining four patients. CONCLUSION: We observed that thiopurine-induced myelotoxicity also occurs because of (extremely) high 6-MMP concentrations in patients with a skewed thiopurine metabolism. Continued treatment with adapted thiopurine therapy was successful in almost all patients.