Custeio Baseado em Atividade e Tempo (TDABC) do modelo CEDMAC de terapia assistida para dispensação de medicamentos imunobiológicos para doenças reumatológicas no SUS / Time-Driven Activity Based Costing (TDABC) of the CEDMAC model of assisted therapy for dispensing immunobiological rheumatologic medications at SUS

Objetivos: Mensurar o custo dos procedimentos de infusão de imunobiológicos no modelo CEDMAC (Centro de Dispensação de Medicações de Alto Custo) e estimar o custo minimização integral gerada pela existência desse modelo. Métodos: A metodologia de Custeio Baseado em Atividade e Tempo (TDABC) foi usada para calcular os custos dos procedimentos. Tempos de atividades, capacidades máximas de atendimento e fluxos dos processos internos foram obtidos em entrevistas e validados por meio de acompanhamento de pacientes. Os procedimentos foram categorizados em três tipos: a) aplicação subcutânea, b) infusão endovenosa rápida e c) infusão endovenosa longa. O custo-minimização foi estimado a partir de análise de 2017 para pacientes com artrite reumatoide (AR). Resultados: Ao longo de 2019, foram realizados 12.074 atendimentos no CEDMAC. Desses atendimentos, 60% foram de aplicação subcutânea (custo de R$ 117,90), 30%, de infusão endovenosa rápida (custo de R$ 169,90) e 10%, de endovenosa longa (custo de R$ 217,50). Usando a análise realizada em 2017, foi possível calcular o custo-minimização integral do modelo (uma economia líquida estimada de R$ 1.258.024,26 ao ano) e também extrapolar esses valores para todo o SUS caso o modelo fosse difundido no país (uma economia líquida estimada de R$ 189.401.652,88). Conclusão: Utilizando o método de TDABC, foi possível realizar de maneira rápida e eficiente o custeio dos principais procedimentos realizados no modelo CEDMAC. Essa análise embasará a solicitação da incorporação desses procedimentos na tabela unificada do SUS. Caso os procedimentos sejam incorporados e o modelo CEDMAC, difundido pelo Brasil, estima-se que a economia gerada seja da ordem de 189 milhões de reais ao ano.

Objectives: To measure the costs of immunobiological infusion procedures in the CEDMAC model (Centro de Dispensação de Medicações de Alto Custo) and to estimate the full cost-minimization generated by the existence of this model. Methods: Time-Driven Activity Based Costing (TDABC) methodology was used to calculate the procedures costs. Activity times, service capacities and internal flows were obtained from employee interviews and validated by follow-up with patients. Procedures were categorized into three types: a) subcutaneous, b) intravenous fast infusion, and c) intravenous slow infusion. The full cost-minimization was estimated based on a 2017 analysis of the cost-minimization for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Results: In 2019, 12,074 patients were attended at CEDMAC. Of these, 60% of infusions were subcutaneous (costing R$ 117.90 each), 30% were fast intravenous infusion (costing R$ 169.90), and 10% were slow intravenous infusion (costing R$ 217.50). Using a 2017 RA analysis, it was possible to calculate the full cost-minimization of the model, with an estimated net savings of R$ 1,258,024.26 per year. The estimated net savings if the model were disseminated throughout the country for the entire SUS would be R$ 189,401,652.88. Conclusion: Using the TDABC method it was possible to quickly and efficiently estimate the cost allocation of the main procedures performed in the CEDMAC model. This analysis will support the request for incorporating these procedures into SUS. If the procedures were incorporated, and the CEDMAC model was disseminated throughout Brazil, the savings generated by this initiative could be up to 189 million reais per year.

Increment of immunogenicity after third dose of a homologous inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in a large population of patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the immunogenicity of the third dose of CoronaVac vaccine in a large population of patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) and the factors associated with impaired response. METHODS: Adult patients with ARD and age-balanced/sex-balanced controls (control group, CG) previously vaccinated with two doses of CoronaVac received the third dose at D210 (6 months after the second dose). The presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG and neutralising antibodies (NAb) was evaluated previously to vaccination (D210) and 30 days later (D240). Patients with controlled disease suspended mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for 7 days or methotrexate (MTX) for 2 weekly doses after vaccination. RESULTS: ARD (n=597) and CG (n=199) had comparable age (p=0.943). Anti-S1/S2 IgG seropositivity rates significantly increased from D210 (60%) to D240 (93%) (p<0.0001) in patients with ARD. NAb positivity also increased: 38% (D210) vs 81.4% (D240) (p<0.0001). The same pattern was observed for CG, with significantly higher frequencies for both parameters at D240 (p<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analyses in the ARD group revealed that older age (OR=0.98, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.0, p=0.024), vasculitis diagnosis (OR=0.24, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.53, p<0.001), prednisone ≥5 mg/day (OR=0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.77, p=0.003), MMF (OR=0.30, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.61, p<0.001) and biologics (OR=0.27, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.46, p<0.001) were associated with reduced anti-S1/S2 IgG positivity. Similar analyses demonstrated that prednisone ≥5 mg/day (OR=0.63, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.90, p=0.011), abatacept (OR=0.39, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.74, p=0.004), belimumab (OR=0.29, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.67, p=0.004) and rituximab (OR=0.11, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.30, p<0.001) were negatively associated with NAb positivity. Further evaluation of COVID-19 seronegative ARD at D210 demonstrated prominent increases in positivity rates at D240 for anti-S1/S2 IgG (80.5%) and NAb (59.1%) (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We provide novel data on a robust response to the third dose of CoronaVac in patients with ARD, even in those with prevaccination COVID-19 seronegative status. Drugs implicated in reducing immunogenicity after the regular two-dose regimen were associated with non-responsiveness after the third dose, except for MTX. Trial registration number NCT04754698.

Assisted therapy model for dispensing immunobiological drugs for rheumatoid arthritis by the Brazilian Unified Health System: rational use of resources reduces expenses

Objective: The incorporation of immunobiological agents for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment at the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) represented a significant advance but had an important impact on the budget. As the current model of direct patient delivery had deficiencies, the CEDMAC model of assisted therapy was implemented to focus on rational use to minimize expenses and increase access. However, there is no data to compare the two models. Thus, this study aimed to compare the number of bottles effectively dispensed by the CEDMAC model to direct dispensing and assess its financial impact. Methods: Care of RA patients at CEDMAC in 2015, whose immunobiological drugs were provided by the Ministry of Health, were included. Drug and dose received, prescribed dose, the number of bottles, cancellations due to contraindication, and absences were recorded. As a comparison, the number of bottles that would be delivered by direct dispensing was estimated. The difference between the total number of bottles dispensed by the two systems and the financial impact of the purchase price in 2015 was calculated. Results: In 2015, CEDMAC provided 3,784 consultations for RA patients. The total number of bottles of immunobiological agents prescribed was 10,000 bottles, and 1,946 (19.5%) were not used for bottle optimization, contraindications, or absenteeism. Unused bottles reduced expenses by R$ 806,132.62. The expansion of the model to the entire SUS would reduce costs by R$ 121,110,388.27. Conclusion: The CEDMAC assisted therapy model considerably reduces the volume of dispensed bottles and can significantly reduce expenses in the supply of immunobiological agents for RA at SUS.

Modelo de terapia assistida para dispensação de medicamentos imunobiológicos para artrite reumatoide no Sistema Único de Saúde: uso racional de recursos reduz despesas / Assisted therapy model for dispensing immunobiological drugs for rheumatoid arthritis by the Brazilian Unified Health System: rational use of resources reduces expenses

Objetivo: A incorporação dos imunobiológicos para tratamento da artrite reumatoide (AR) no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) representou um avanço significativo, porém teve um impacto importante no orçamento. Como o modelo vigente de dispensação direta ao paciente apresentava deficiências, implementou-se o modelo do CEDMAC de terapia assistida com foco no uso racional, visando minimizar despesas e potencializar o alcance. Entretanto, não há dados que comparem os dois modelos. Assim, esse estudo objetivou comparar o número de frascos efetivamente dispensados pelo modelo do CEDMAC à dispensação direta e avaliar seu impacto financeiro. Métodos: Foram incluídos atendimentos de pacientes com AR no CEDMAC em 2015, cujo imunobiológico foi fornecido pelo Ministério da Saúde. Foram registrados medicamento e dose recebidos, dose prescrita, número de frascos, cancelamentos por contraindicação e faltas. Como comparação, foi estimado o número de frascos que seriam entregues pela dispensação direta. Calculou-se a diferença entre o número total de frascos dispensados pelos dois sistemas e o impacto financeiro pelo valor de aquisição em 2015. Resultados: Em 2015, o CEDMAC realizou 3.784 atendimentos para pacientes com AR. O total de frascos de imunobiológicos prescritos foi de 10.000 frascos e 1.946 (19,5%) não foram utilizados por otimização de frascos, contraindicações ou absenteísmo. Os frascos não utilizados reduziram as despesas em R$ 806.132,62. A expansão do modelo para todo SUS reduziria as despesas em R$ 121.110.388,27. Conclusão: O modelo de terapia assistida do CEDMAC reduz consideravelmente o volume de frascos dispensados e pode trazer uma relevante redução de despesas no fornecimento dos imunobiológicos para AR no SUS.

Objective: The incorporation of immunobiologicals for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) represented a significant advance but had an important impact on the budget. As the current model of direct delivery to the patient presented deficiencies, the CEDMAC model of assisted therapy focusing on rational use was implemented to minimize expenses and increase access. However, there is no data comparing the two models. Thus, this study aimed to compare the number of vials effectively dispensed by the CEDMAC model compared to direct delivery and to evaluate its financial impact. Methods: We included RA patients attended at CEDMAC during 2015, whose immunobiological was provided by Ministry of Health. Drug and dose received, prescribed dose, number of vials, cancellations due to contraindication and absences were recorded. As comparison, the number of vials that would be delivered by the direct delivery model were estimated. Savings were calculated by the difference between the total number of vials dispensed by the two systems and the financial impact by acquisition value in 2015. Results: During 2015, CEDMAC performed 3,784 consultations for RA patients. The total number of immunobiological vials prescribed was 10,000 vials and 1,946 (19.5%) were not used for vial optimization, contraindications or absenteeism. Saved vials reduced expenses by R$ 806,132.62. The expansion of the model for all SUS would reduce expenses by R$ 121,110,388.27. Conclusion: CEDMAC's model of assisted therapy considerably reduces the volume of dispensed vials and can bring significant cost offsets in the supply of RA immunobiologicals by SUS.

Immunogenicity and safety of primary fractional-dose yellow fever vaccine in autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

BACKGROUND: Brazil faced a yellow fever(YF) outbreak in 2016-2018 and vaccination was considered for autoimmune rheumatic disease patients(ARD) with low immunosuppression due to YF high mortality. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate, prospectively for the first time, the short-term immunogenicity of the fractional YF vaccine(YFV) immunization in ARD patients with low immunossupression. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 318 participants(159 ARD and 159 age- and sex-matched healthy controls) were vaccinated with the fractional-dose(one fifth) of 17DD-YFV. All subjects were evaluated at entry(D0), D5, D10, and D30 post-vaccination for clinical/laboratory and disease activity parameters for ARD patients. Post-vaccination seroconversion rate(83.7%vs.96.6%, p = 0.0006) and geometric mean titers(GMT) of neutralizing antibodies[1143.7 (95%CI 1012.3-1292.2) vs.731 (95%CI 593.6-900.2), p<0.001] were significantly lower in ARD compared to controls. A lower positivity rate of viremia was also identified for ARD patients compared to controls at D5 (53%vs.70%, p = 0.005) and the levels persisted in D10 for patients and reduced for controls(51%vs.19%, p = 0.0001). The viremia was the only variable associated with seroconvertion. No serious adverse events were reported. ARD disease activity parameters remained stable at D30(p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Fractional-dose 17DD-YF vaccine in ARD patients resulted in a high rate of seroconversion rate(>80%) but lower than controls, with a longer but less intense viremia. This vaccine was immunogenic, safe and did not induce flares in ARD under low immunosuppression and may be indicated in YF outbreak situations and for patients who live or travel to endemic areas. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT03430388).

Ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis: revisiting screening of latent tuberculosis infection and its follow-up during anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in an endemic area.

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate the performance and distinctive pattern of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI) screening and treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) under anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy and determine the relevance of re-exposure and other risk factors for TB development. METHODS: A total of 135 and 83 patients with AS and PsA, respectively, were evaluated for LTBI treatment before receiving anti-TNF drugs via the tuberculin skin test (TST), chest radiography, and TB exposure history assessment. All subjects were evaluated for TB infection at 3-month intervals. RESULTS: The patients with AS were more often treated for LTBI than were those with PsA (42% versus 30%, p=0.043). The former also presented a higher frequency of TST positivity (93% versus 64%, p=0.002), although they had a lower frequency of exposure history (18% versus 52%, p=0.027) and previous TB (0.7% versus 6%, p=0.03). During follow-up [median, 5.8 years; interquartile range (1QR), 2.2-9.0 years], 11/218 (5%) patients developed active TB (AS, n=7; PsA, n=4). TB re-exposure was the main cause in seven patients (64%) after 12 months of therapy (median, 21.9 months; IQR, 14.2-42.8 months) and five LTBI-negative patients. TB was identified within the first year in four patients (36.3%) (median, 5.3 months; IQR, 1.2-8.8 months), two of whom were LTBI-positive. There was no difference in the TB-free survival according to the anti-TNF drug type/class; neither synthetic drug nor prednisone use was related to TB occurrence (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Known re-exposure is the most critical factor for incident TB cases in spondyloarthritis. There are also some distinct features in AS and PsA LTBI screening, considering the higher frequency of LTBI and TST positivities in patients with AS. Annual risk reassessment taking into consideration these peculiar features and including the TST should be recommended for patients in endemic countries.

Improvement of conjunctival cytological grade and tear production in Ankylosing Spondylitis patients under TNF inhibitors: a long-term follow-up.

Dry eye disease can compromise the patient's quality of life. Few studies assessed the ocular surface (OS) in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) patients. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and cytological findings of the OS in patients with AS, classify dry eye disease (DED) severity grade and conjunctival impression cytology (IC), and the effects of TNF inhibitors (TNFi) in a one-year follow-up. A baseline (BL) evaluation included 36 AS patients and 39 healthy controls. They fulfilled the Ocular Surface Index Disease questionnaire and underwent the Schirmer I test, break-up time, vital staining, and conjunctival IC. A DED severity grade, as well as IC rating, was applied. Fourteen of these patients received TNFi and analysis of ocular and systemic AS disease parameters occurred at BL and three months (3 M), and 12 months (12 M) after treatment. The AS patients presented a higher frequency of DED (p = 0.01), a worse score of severity (p = 0.001), and a higher frequency of altered IC (p = 0.007) when compared to controls. The 14 patients under TNFi presented an improvement in all the clinical disease activity parameters throughout the one-year treatment (p < 0.05) even as a concomitant increase in the Schirmer test (p = 0.04), and a significant amelioration in the altered IC to a normal IC (p = 0.006). DED is a frequent and under-diagnosed ocular disease in AS patients. The long-term parallel improvement of disease activity and OS parameters in AS patients receiving TNFi suggests that the OS can be an additional target of systemic inflammation in AS.

Ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis: revisiting screening of latent tuberculosis infection and its follow-up during anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in an endemic area

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate the performance and distinctive pattern of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI) screening and treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) under anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy and determine the relevance of re-exposure and other risk factors for TB development. METHODS: A total of 135 and 83 patients with AS and PsA, respectively, were evaluated for LTBI treatment before receiving anti-TNF drugs via the tuberculin skin test (TST), chest radiography, and TB exposure history assessment. All subjects were evaluated for TB infection at 3-month intervals. RESULTS: The patients with AS were more often treated for LTBI than were those with PsA (42% versus 30%, p=0.043). The former also presented a higher frequency of TST positivity (93% versus 64%, p=0.002), although they had a lower frequency of exposure history (18% versus 52%, p=0.027) and previous TB (0.7% versus 6%, p=0.03). During follow-up [median, 5.8 years; interquartile range (1QR), 2.2-9.0 years], 11/218 (5%) patients developed active TB (AS, n=7; PsA, n=4). TB re-exposure was the main cause in seven patients (64%) after 12 months of therapy (median, 21.9 months; IQR, 14.2-42.8 months) and five LTBI-negative patients. TB was identified within the first year in four patients (36.3%) (median, 5.3 months; IQR, 1.2-8.8 months), two of whom were LTBI-positive. There was no difference in the TB-free survival according to the anti-TNF drug type/class; neither synthetic drug nor prednisone use was related to TB occurrence (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Known re-exposure is the most critical factor for incident TB cases in spondyloarthritis. There are also some distinct features in AS and PsA LTBI screening, considering the higher frequency of LTBI and TST positivities in patients with AS. Annual risk reassessment taking into consideration these peculiar features and including the TST should be recommended for patients in endemic countries.

Changing rate of serious infections in biologic-exposed rheumatoid arthritis patients. Data from South American registries BIOBADABRASIL and BIOBADASAR.

OBJECTIVE: Most reports on serious infections (SI) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are from the USA and Western Europe. Data from other regions are largely missing. We report data from South American countries with different backgrounds and health-care systems but similar registries. METHODS: We merged 2010-2016 data from two registries, BIOBADABRASIL (Brazil) and BIOBADASAR (Argentina), which share the same protocol, online platform and data monitoring process. Patients with active RA were included when they began the first bDMARD or a conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD, control group). The SI incidence rate (IR) per 1000 patient/years and adjusted IR ratio (aIRR) were estimated for bDMARDs and csDMARDs. RESULTS: Data were analysed for 3717 RA patients with an exposure of 13,380 patient/years. The 2591 patients treated with bDMARDs (64% tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFi)) had a follow-up of 9300 years, and the 1126 treated with csDMARDs had an exposure of 4081 patient/years. The SI IR was 30.54 (CI 27.18-34.30) for all bDMARDs and 5.15 (CI 3.36-7.89) for csDMARDs. The aIRR between the two groups was 2.03 ([1.05, 3.9] p = 0.034) for the first 6 months of treatment but subsequently increased to 8.26 ([4.32, 15.76] p < 0.001). The SI IR for bDMARDs decreased over time in both registries, dropping from 36.59 (28.41-47.12) in 2012 to 7.27 (4.79-11.05) in 2016. CONCLUSION: While SI remains a major concern in South American patients with RA treated with bDMARDs, a favourable trend toward a reduction was observed in the last years.Key Points• New comprehensive data on biologic drugs safety from international collaboration in South America.• First proposal for national registries data merging in South America.• Serious infections remain a major concern in RA patients treated with biologics.• A significant reduction of serious infections in RA patients exposed to biologics was observed over a 7 years period.

Favorable rituximab response in patients with refractory idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

BACKGROUND: Interpretation of rituximab efficacy for refractory idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) is hampered by the absence of a uniform definition of refractory myositis and clinical response. Therefore, rigorous criteria of refractoriness, together with a homogenous definition of clinical improvement, were used to evaluate rituximab one-year response. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study including 43 IIM (15 antisynthetase syndrome, 16 dermatomyositis, 12 polymyositis) was conducted. All patients had refractory disease (inadequate response to at least two immunosuppressives/immunomodulatories and no less than three months sequentially or concomitantly glucocorticoid tapering) criteria. Clinical/laboratory improvement at one-year was based on modified International Myositis Assessment & Clinical Studies Group (IMACS) core set measures. The patients received two infusions of rituximab (1 g each) at baseline, followed by repeated dose after 6 months. Baseline immunosuppressive therapy was maintained and glucocorticoid dose was tapered according to clinical/laboratory parameters. RESULTS: Five patients had side effects at the first rituximab application and were excluded. Therefore, 38 out of 43 patients completed the one-year follow up. Almost 75% of the patients attained clinical and laboratory response after one-year. A significant reduction in median glucocorticoid dose (18.8 vs. 6.3 mg/day) was achieved and 42% patients were able to discontinue prednisone. In contrast, young individuals and patients with dysphagia had a tendency to be non-responders to rituximab. No severe infections were observed. CONCLUSION: This study provides convincing evidence that rituximab is an effective and safe therapy for refractory IIM.

Dermatomyositis and polymyositis: from immunopathology to immunotherapy (immunobiologics).

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), which include dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM), are chronic systemic diseases associated with high morbidity and functional disability. Current treatment is based on the use of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive drugs, but a considerable number of patients is refractory to traditional therapy. That has led to the attempted use of biologics based on the physiopathogenesis of IIM. From the immunopathological viewpoint, PM and DM differ: the former is more related to cellular immunity, while the latter, to humoral immunity. In both, however, elevated concentrations of proinflammatory interleukins (TNF, IL-1, IL-6) and increased expression of molecules related to costimulation of T lymphocytes have been described; thus, the use of biologics in those conditions seems reasonable. Considering the biologics available, open-label studies are scarce, comprising mainly case reports and series. TNF blockers have yielded conflicting results, with no evidence of good response to treatment. The anti-CD20 therapy has the most promising results. Data on T lymphocyte costimulation blockade and anti-IL-6 therapy are extremely scarce, preventing any consideration. Thus, the use of biologics in IIM still remains an unconquered frontier. Biologics may have an important role in the management of IIM refractory to conventional therapy, but further prospective studies based on objective parameters of response to treatment are needed. So far, anti-CD20 therapy seems to be the most promising treatment for refractory IIM.

Testicular Sertoli cell function in ankylosing spondylitis.

To assess the testicular Sertoli cell function according to inhibin B levels in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients and the possible effect of anti-TNF therapy on this hormone production, 20 consecutive AS patients and 24 healthy controls were evaluated. At study entry, AS patients were not receiving sulfasalazine/methotrexate and never have used biological/cytotoxic agents. They were assessed by serum inhibin B levels, hormone profile, urological examination, testicular ultrasound, seminal parameters, and clinical features. Ten of these patients received anti-TNF treatment and they were reevaluated for Sertoli function and disease parameters at 6 months. Four of them agreed to repeat sperm analysis. At study entry, the median of inhibin B (68 vs. 112.9 pg/mL, p = 0.111), follicle-stimulating hormone levels (3.45 vs. 3.65 IU/L, p = 0.795), and the other hormones was comparable in AS patients and controls (p > 0.05). Sperm analysis was similar in AS patients and controls (p > 0.05) with one AS patient presenting borderline low inhibin B levels. Further analysis at 6 months of the 10 patients referred for anti-TNF therapy, including one with borderline inhibin B, revealed that median inhibin B levels remained stable (116.5 vs. 126.5 pg/mL, p = 0.431) with a significant improvement in C-reactive protein (27.8 vs. 2.27 mg/L, p = 0.039). Sperm motility and concentration were preserved in the four patients who repeated this analysis after TNF blockage. In conclusion, this was the first study to report, using a specific marker, a normal testicular Sertoli cell function in AS patients with mild to moderate disease activity.

Dermatomiosite e polimiosite: da imunopatologia à imunoterapia (imunobiológicos) / Dermatomyositis and polymyositis: from immunopathology to immunotherapy (immunobiologics)

As miopatias inflamatórias idiopáticas (MII), das quais fazem parte a dermatomiosite (DM) e a polimiosite (PM), são doenças sistêmicas crônicas associadas a alta morbidade e incapacidade funcional. O tratamento atual baseia-se na corticoterapia e no uso de imunossupressores, porém uma parcela considerável dos pacientes é refratária à terapia tradicional. Isso tem levado à tentativa de uso de imunobiológicos nesses pacientes, tendo por fundamento a fisiopatogênese das MII. Do ponto de vista imunopatológico, há diferenças entre PM e DM: a primeira está mais relacionada à imunidade celular, enquanto na segunda o papel humoral parece mais importante. Em ambas, porém, são descritas concentrações elevadas de interleucinas pró-inflamatórias (TNF, IL-1, IL-6) e aumento da expressão de moléculas relacionadas à coestimulação dos linfócitos T - nessas condições, parece racional o uso da terapia biológica. Considerando os imunobiológicos disponíveis, são escassos os dados de trabalhos abertos na literatura, compostos principalmente por séries e relatos de casos. Os bloqueadores do TNF apresentam resultados conflitantes sem evidência de boa resposta ao tratamento. A terapia anti-CD20 possui os resultados mais promissores. É extremamente escassa a informação sobre o bloqueio da coestimulação do linfócito T e a terapia anti- IL-6, que impede qualquer consideração. Dessa maneira, o uso de imunobiológicos em MII ainda permanece como fronteira a ser explorada. A terapia biológica pode ter papel relevante no tratamento das MII refratárias à terapia convencional; no entanto, novos estudos prospectivos com base em parâmetros objetivos de resposta ao tratamento são necessários. Até o momento, a terapia anti-CD20 parece ser a mais promissora no tratamento das MII refratárias.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), which include dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM), are chronic systemic diseases associated with high morbidity and functional disability. Current treatment is based on the use of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive drugs, but a considerable number of patients is refractory to traditional therapy. That has led to the attempted use of biologics based on the physiopathogenesis of IIM. From the immunopathological viewpoint, PM and DM differ: the former is more related to cellular immunity, while the latter, to humoral immunity. In both, however, elevated concentrations of proinflammatory interleukins (TNF, IL-1, IL-6) and increased expression of molecules related to costimulation of T lymphocytes have been described; thus, the use of biologics in those conditions seems reasonable. Considering the biologics available, open-label studies are scarce, comprising mainly case reports and series. TNF blockers have yielded conflicting results, with no evidence of good response to treatment. The anti-CD20 therapy has the most promising results. Data on T lymphocyte costimulation blockade and anti-IL-6 therapy are extremely scarce, preventing any consideration. Thus, the use of biologics in IIM still remains an unconquered frontier. Biologics may have an important role in the management of IIM refractory to conventional therapy, but further prospective studies based on objective parameters of response to treatment are needed. So far, anti-CD20 therapy seems to be the most promising treatment for refractory IIM.

Efeito da inflamação no peptídeo natriurético atrial (NT-proBNP) em pacientes com espondilite anquilosante ativa durante terapia anti-TNF / Effect of inflammation on atrial natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels in active ankylosing spondylitis patients receiving anti-TNF therapy

Introdução: O fragmento amino-terminal do pró-peptídeo natriurético do tipo B (NT-proBNP) é um forte marcador de doença cardiovascular com evidências recentes de que a inflamação também pode influenciar seus valores. A diferenciação dessa variável de confusão é de particular interesse nas doenças reumáticas. Objetivos: Avaliar o comportamento dos valores de NT-proBNP em pacientes com espondilite anquilosante (EA) pré e pós uso de bloqueadores de TNF para determinar a possível associação entre os valores de NT-proBNP e os parâmetros inflamatórios. Métodos: Quarenta e cinco pacientes consecutivos com EA sem evidência prévia ou atual de doença cardiovascular ou disfunção miocárdica sistólica e que eram elegíveis para terapia anti-TNF foram incluídos prospectivamente. Todos os pacientes receberam bloqueadores de TNF e foram avaliados para concentrações circulantes de NT-proBNP, parâmetros clínicos e laboratoriais de atividade de doença, fatores de risco cardiovasculares tradicionais e ecodopplercardiografia convencional e tecidual no momento da inclusão e após seis meses de tratamento. Resultados: No momento da inclusão, todos os pacientes tinham EA ativa, os valores de NT-proBNP tinham uma mediana de 36 (20-72) pg/mL e 11% dos valores estavam altos mesmo na ausência de alteração miocárdica sistólica. A análise de regressão linear múltipla revelou que esse peptídeo estava independentemente correlacionado com o VHS (p < 0,001), com a idade dos pacientes (p = 0,01) e com a pressão de pulso (p = 0,01) no momento da inclusão. Após seis meses, todos os parâmetros relacionados a doença de base melhoraram e os valores de NT-proBNP se reduziram significativamente [24 (16-47) pg/mL, p = 0,037] quando comparados com os valores do momento da inclusão. As mudanças nos valores de NT-proBNP correlacionaram-se positivamente com as mudanças nos valores do VHS (r = 0,41, p = 0.006). Os fatores de risco cardiovasculares avaliados permaneceram estáveis durante o seguimento...

Introduction: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a strong marker of cardiovascular disease with recent evidence that inflammation may also influence its levels; discrimination of this confounding variable is of particular interest in rheumatic diseases. Objectives: to evaluate NT-proBNP in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients pre- and post-TNF blocker to determine the possible association between NT-proBNP levels and inflammatory parameters. Methods: Forty-five consecutive AS patients without previous/current cardiovascular disease or systolic myocardial dysfunction, who were eligible to anti-TNF therapy, were prospectively enrolled. All patients received TNF blockers and they were evaluated for circulating NT-proBNP levels, clinical and laboratory parameters of disease activity, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and conventional and tissue Doppler imaging echocardiography at baseline (BL) and six months after (6M) treatment. Results: At BL, all patients had active AS, NT-proBNP levels had a median of 36 (20-72) pg/mL and 11% were high in spite of no systolic alteration. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that this peptide, at BL, was independently correlated with ESR (p < 0.001), age (p = 0.01) and pulse pressure (p = 0.01). After 6M, all disease parameters improved and NT-proBNP levels were significantly reduced [24 (16-47) pg/mL, p = 0.037] compared to BL. Changes in NT-proBNP were positively correlated with ESR changes (r = 0.41, p = 0.006). Cardiovascular risk factors remained stable during follow-up. Conclusion: our data suggests that elevations of NT-proBNP should be interpreted with caution in active AS patients with no other evidence of cardiovascular disease. The short-term reduction of NT-proBNP levels in these patients receiving anti-TNF therapy appears to reflect an improvement in inflammatory status...

Pandemic unadjuvanted influenza A (H1N1) vaccine in dermatomyositis and polymyositis: immunogenicity independent of therapy and no harmful effect in disease.

The goal of the present study was to evaluate the influence of the influenza A H1N1/2009 vaccine on dermatomyositis/polymyositis (DM/PM) disease parameters and the potential deleterious effect of therapy on immune response. Thirty-seven DM and 21 PM patients (Bohan and Peter's criteria) were gender- and age-matched to 116 healthy controls. Seroprotection, seroconversion, the geometric mean titers (GMTs) and the factor increase (FI) in the GMTs were calculated. Disease safety was determined from a muscle enzyme analysis and the DM/PM scores [patient's visual analog scale (VAS), physician's VAS, manual muscle strength (MMT-8)] evaluated pre- and post-vaccination. The mean age (43.1±9.9 vs. 43.8±8.4 years, p=0.607) and gender distribution (p=1.00) were comparable between the patients and controls. After 21 days, seroconversion (p=0.394), seroprotection (p=0.08), GMT (p=0.573) and the FI in the GMT (p=0.496) were similar in both groups. The disease and muscle parameters remained stable throughout the study, including the creatine kinase (p=0.20) and aldolase levels (p=0.98), the physicians' VAS (p=1.00), the patients' VAS (p=1.00) and the MMT-8 (p=1.00). Regarding the influence of treatment, the seroconversion rates were comparable between the controls and patients undergoing treatment with glucocorticoid (GC) (p=0.969), GC >0.5mg/kg/day (p=0.395) and GC+immunosuppressors (p=0.285). Vaccine-related adverse events were mild and similar in the DM/PM and control groups (p>0.05). Our data support the administration of the pandemic influenza A H1N1/2009 vaccination in DM/PM, as we found no short-term harmful effects related to the disease itself and adequate immunogenicity in spite of therapy. Further studies are necessary to identify any long-term adverse effects in patients with these diseases.

Intestinal microsporidiosis: a hidden risk in rheumatic disease patients undergoing anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy combined with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs?

OBJECTIVE: Immunosuppressed patients are at risk of microsporidiosis, and this parasitosis has an increased rate of dissemination in this population. Our objective was to evaluate the presence of microsporidiosis and other intestinal parasites in rheumatic disease patients undergoing anti-tumor necrosis factor/disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients (47 with rheumatoid arthritis, 31 with ankylosing spondylitis and 11 with psoriatic arthritis) and 92 healthy control patients were enrolled in the study. Three stool samples and cultures were collected from each subject. RESULTS: The frequency of microsporidia was significantly higher in rheumatic disease patients than in control subjects (36 vs. 4%, respectively; p<0.0001), as well as in those with rheumatic diseases (32 vs. 4%, respectively; p<0.0001), ankylosing spondylitis (45 vs. 4%, respectively; p<0.0001) and psoriatic arthritis (40 vs. 4%, respectively; p<0.0001), despite a similar social-economic class distribution in both the patient and control groups (p = 0.1153). Of note, concomitant fecal leukocytes were observed in the majority of the microsporidia-positive patients (79.5%). Approximately 80% of the patients had gastrointestinal symptoms, such as diarrhea (26%), abdominal pain (31%) and weight loss (5%), although the frequencies of these symptoms were comparable in patients with and without this infection (p>0.05). Rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis disease activity parameters were comparable in both groups (p>0.05). The duration of anti-tumor necrosis factor/disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and glucocorticoid use were also similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: We have documented that microsporidiosis with intestinal mucosa disruption is frequent in patients undergoing concomitant anti-tumor necrosis factor/disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug therapy. Impaired host defenses due to the combination of the underlying disease and the immunosuppressive therapy is the most likely explanation for this finding, and this increased susceptibility reinforces the need for the investigation of microsporidia and implementation of treatment strategies in this population.

Intestinal microsporidiosis: a hidden risk in rheumatic disease patients undergoing anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy combined with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs?

OBJECTIVE: Immunosuppressed patients are at risk of microsporidiosis, and this parasitosis has an increased rate of dissemination in this population. Our objective was to evaluate the presence of microsporidiosis and other intestinal parasites in rheumatic disease patients undergoing anti-tumor necrosis factor/disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients (47 with rheumatoid arthritis, 31 with ankylosing spondylitis and 11 with psoriatic arthritis) and 92 healthy control patients were enrolled in the study. Three stool samples and cultures were collected from each subject. RESULTS: The frequency of microsporidia was significantly higher in rheumatic disease patients than in control subjects (36 vs. 4 percent, respectively; p<0.0001), as well as in those with rheumatic diseases (32 vs. 4 percent, respectively; p<0.0001), ankylosing spondylitis (45 vs. 4 percent, respectively; p<0.0001) and psoriatic arthritis (40 vs. 4 percent, respectively; p<0.0001), despite a similar social-economic class distribution in both the patient and control groups (p = 0.1153). Of note, concomitant fecal leukocytes were observed in the majority of the microsporidia-positive patients (79.5 percent). Approximately 80 percent of the patients had gastrointestinal symptoms, such as diarrhea (26 percent), abdominal pain (31 percent) and weight loss (5 percent), although the frequencies of these symptoms were comparable in patients with and without this infection (p>0.05). Rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis disease activity parameters were comparable in both groups (p>0.05). The duration of anti-tumor necrosis factor/disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and glucocorticoid use were also similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: We have documented that microsporidiosis with intestinal mucosa disruption is frequent in patients undergoing concomitant anti-tumor necrosis factor/disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug therapy. Impaired host defenses due to the combination of the underlying disease and the immunosuppressive therapy is the most likely explanation for this finding, and this increased susceptibility reinforces the need for the investigation of microsporidia and implementation of treatment strategies in this population.

Immediate complications of 3,555 injections of anti-TNFα.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the immediate complications of anti-TNFα drugs at the "Center for Dispensation of High Cost Medications" of HC-FMUSP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who received anti-TNFα agents between August 2007 and March 2009 were included in this study. Immediate complications (up to 1 hour after the injection) were classified as mild (headache, rash, dizziness, itching, nausea), moderate (fever, urticaria, palpitation, chest pain, dyspnea, blood pressure variations between 20 and 40 mmHg), or severe (fever with chills, dyspnea with wheezing, variations in blood pressure > 40 mmHg). RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-two patients were evaluated: 94 (39%) with rheumatoid arthritis, 64 (26%) with ankylosing spondylitis, 32 (13%) with psoriatic arthritis, 26 (11%) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis; and 27 (11%) with other diagnoses. A total of 3,555 injections were administered: 992 (28%) adalimumab, 1,546 (43%) etanercept, and 1,017 (29%) infliximab. Immediate adverse events were observed in 39/242 (16%) patients. Injection related complications were observed in 46/3,555 (1.2%) injections. They were more common with infliximab than adalimumab (3.7% vs. 0.5%, P < 0.0001) and etanercept (3.7% vs. 0.25%, P < 0.0001). Complications were classified as mild 14/45 (31%), moderate 21/45 (47%), and severe 10/45 (22%), and occurred mainly in the first six months of treatment (56%) and after intravenous injections, especially (76%) in the first hour. CONCLUSION: Although rare, acute reactions can be severe, being observed more commonly after the initial injections, both intravenous and subcutaneous. More studies are necessary to define whether those immunobiological agents should be administered only in facilities capable of managing medical emergencies.

Autoantibodies in patients with psoriatic arthritis on anti-TNFα therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-TNFα therapy has been effective in the treatment of patients with refractory psoriatic arthritis (PSA). However, the risk of developing autoantibodies commonly found in rheumatic diseases in PSA patients undergoing this therapy is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the induction of specific autoantibodies after anti-TNFα therapy in PSA patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serum samples from 23 PSA patients (women: 61%, age: 45.04 ± 12.68 years, polyarticular: 69.6%, disease duration: 13.3 ± 7.7 years, infliximab: 82.60%) obtained immediately before (baseline) and approximately one year after the introduction of anti-TNF therapy (last sample) (385 ± 131.45 days), were analyzed. The analysis included detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-dsDNA antibodies (indirect immunofluorescence on Hep-2 cells and Crithidia luciliae, respectively); anti-RNP and anti-Sm (passive hemagglutination); and anti-Ro/ SS-A and/or anti-La/SS-B, anti-chromatin, anti-histones, anti-citrullinated peptide (CCP), and anti-cardiolipin (ELISA) antibodies. RESULTS: At baseline, ANA was positive in 47.8% of patients, with predominance of homogeneous nuclear pattern (81.8%). All baseline serum samples were negative for rheumatoid factor and antibodies to cardiolipin, RNP, Sm, Ro/SS-A, anti-La/SS-B, anti-histone, and anti-dsDNA antibodies, while two patients were positive for anti-chromatin and one for anti-CCP. All ANA-positive samples at baseline, except for one, remained positive after the introduction of anti-TNF therapy; however, de novo ANA reactivity was observed in four originally negative patients (33.3%). Anti-Ro/SS-A, La/SS-B, cardiolipin, histones, dsDNA, and rheumatoid factor antibodies remained negative in all final serum samples tested, and anti-chromatin positivity was detected in three other patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings have shown that anti-TNF therapy induced ANA positivity in one third of PSA patients. The concomitant use of methotrexate did not interfere with this finding. In addition, all serum samples were systematically negative for specific rheumatic autoantibodies tested after the introduction of the biological treatment.

Effects of anti-TNF therapy on glucose metabolism in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis or juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Sixty-two patients were investigated: 7 JIA; 37 AS; and 18 PsA. Caucasian race accounted for 79% and 29% were female. Mean age was 40.4 +/- 12.6 years. None of the patients had a history of diabetes, and none had used oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin. Treatment was with adalimumab, infliximab and etanercept. Glucose, inflammatory markers and prednisone dose were assessed at baseline, as well as after three and six months of treatment. The mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate was significantly lower at three months and six months than at baseline (13.7 +/- 18.0 and 18 +/- 22.5 vs. 27.9 +/- 23.4 mm; p = 0.001). At baseline, three months and six months, we found the following: mean C-reactive protein levels were comparable (22.1 +/- 22.7, 14.5 +/- 30.7 and 16.0 +/- 23.8 mg/L, respectively; p = 0.26); mean glucose levels remained unchanged (90.8 +/- 22.2 mg/dl, 89.5 +/- 14.6 mg/dl and 89.8 +/- 13.6 mg/dl, respectively; p = 0.91); and mean prednisone doses were low and stable (3.9 +/- 4.9 mg/day, 3.7 +/- 4.8 mg/day and 2.6 +/- 4.0 mg/day, respectively; p = 0.23). During the first six months of treatment, anti-TNF therapy does not seem to influence glucose metabolism in JIA, AS or PsA.