Effects of Glycemic Variability in Critically Ill Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Aim and background: Hyperglycemia is considered an adaptive metabolic manifestation of stress and is associated with poor outcomes. Herein, we analyzed the association between glycemic variability (GV) and hospital mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), and the association between GV and mechanical ventilation (MV), ICU stay, length of hospital stays, renal replacement therapy (RRT), hypoglycemia, nosocomial infections, insulin use, and corticosteroid class. Materials and methods: In this retrospective observational study, we collected information on blood glucose levels during the first 10 days of hospitalization in a cohort of ICU patients with COVID-19 and its association with outcomes. Results: In 239 patients, an association was observed between GV and hospital mortality between the first and last quartiles among patients without diabetes [odds ratio (OR), 3.78; confidence interval, 1.24-11.5]. A higher GV was associated with a greater need for RRT (p = 0.002), regular insulin (p < 0.001), and episodes of hypoglycemia (p < 0.001). Nosocomial infections were associated with intermediate GV quartiles (p = 0.02). The corticosteroid class had no association with GV (p = 0.21). Conclusion: Glycemic variability was associated with high mortality in patients with COVID-19 and observed in the subgroup of patients without diabetes. Clinical significance: Glycemic control in critically ill patients remains controversial and hyperglycemia is associated with worse outcomes. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most prevalent comorbidities in patients with COVID-19. In addition, they require corticosteroids due to pulmonary involvement, representing a challenge and an opportunity to better understand how glycemic changes can influence the outcome of these patients. How to cite this article: Boschi E, Friedman G, Moraes RB. Effects of Glycemic Variability in Critically Ill Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Retrospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(4):381-386.

Functional assessment and mortality in underweight critically ill patients one year after hospital discharge: A prospective cohort study.

BACKCGROUND & AIMS: There in no data regarding outcomes after hospital discharge for underweight critically ill patients. This study aimed to assess long-term survival and functional capacity in underweight critically ill patients. MATERIALS & METHODS: Prospective observational study that included underweight critically ill patients (BMI <20 kg/cm2) followed-up one year after hospital discharge. To assess functional capacity, we interviewed patients or caregivers and performed Katz index (KI) and Lawton scale. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) poor functional capacity, if the patient had less points than the median of the Katz and IADL score, and (2) good functional capacity, if at least one score was above the median. Extremely low weight defined as less than 45 kg. RESULTS: We assessed the vital status of 103 patients. Mortality was 38.8% (median 362 [136, 422] days of follow-up). We interviewed 62 patients or proxies. No difference was observed between survivors and non-survivors regarding weight and BMI at intensive care unit admission and nutritional therapy received in the first days of intensive care admission. Patients with poor functional capacity had lower admission weight (43.9 vs 52 ± 7.9 kg, p < 0.001) and BMI (17 ± 2.1 vs 18.2 ± 1.8 kg/cm2, p = 0.028). In a multivariate logistic regression, weight under 45 kg was independently associated with poor functional capacity (OR = 13.6, 95%CI, 3.7 to 66.5) CONCLUSION: Underweight critically ill patients have high mortality and a persistent functional impairment, the last being more important in extremely low weight. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03398343.

Septic shock: Clinical indicators and implications to critical patient care.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical indicators of septic shock in critical care patients. BACKGROUND: The identification of clinical indicators of septic shock is relevant to avoid clinical deterioration of patients with sepsis. However, the recognition of these factors, especially by the nursing team, is still deficient and reinforces the need for studies that investigate the subject in different realities such as that of Brazil. DESIGN: The study had a cross-sectional design based on STROBE guidelines (see Appendix S1). METHODS: A sample of 392 patients with sepsis or septic shock was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of a Brazilian university hospital. Data were collected from medical records of the Intrahospital Sepsis Combat Program referring to patients admitted between January 2018-January 2019. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected, as well as information on the time from diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock to initiation of antibiotic therapy, length of stay, and discharge or death outcomes. Data were statically analysed. RESULTS: Out of the total sample, 190 (49%) patients were admitted with septic shock. Clinical indicators of septic shock were hypotension, mechanical ventilation, lactate levels between 2.0-3.9 or >4, hypothermia <36°C, radiotherapy-associated chemotherapy, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score >3 and admittance through the emergency unit. Among patients with septic shock, 85 (44.7%) were discharged and 105 (55.2%) died in the intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with septic shock presented hyperlactataemia and greater organic dysfunction as clinical indicators when compared to patients with sepsis. Mechanical ventilation, chemotherapy and radiotherapy increased the risk of developing septic shock. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Our results can support the nursing team by providing the main clinical indicators of septic shock and contributing to the interprofessional team in the prevention of septic shock.

Nutritional therapy and outcomes in underweight critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Critically ill patients with body mass index (BMI) < 20 kg/m2 have worse outcomes than normal/overweight patients possibly because underweight is a marker of malnutrition. To assess the effects of nutrition therapy in this population during the first week of an ICU stay. METHODS: Prospective, 2-centre, observational study. Nutritional evaluations were performed between days 2 and 3 (first) and between days 5 and 7 (second) of ICU admission. In the first evaluation, patients were divided into non-fed (without nutritional support) and early-fed (those already receiving nutritional support) groups. In the second evaluation, patients were divided according to caloric intake (≥or<20 kcal/kg) and protein intake (≥or<1.3 g of protein/kg). RESULTS: Of the 4236 patients screened and 342 were included in the cohort. Mortality was 58.5% (median 21 [11-38.25] days of follow-up). Unadjusted patient survival was worse in the non-fed group than in the early-fed group (HR 1.66; 95%CI, 1.18 to 2.32). There was no difference in mortality between groups after adjusting for the SOFA score on the day of the evaluation. At the second evaluation, unadjusted analysis showed better in-hospital survival in patients with higher caloric (HR0.58; 95%CI, 0.40 to 0.86) and protein intake (HR0.59; 95%CI, 0.42 to 0.82); there was no association between mortality and caloric or protein intake after adjusting for the SOFA score on the day of the evaluation. CONCLUSION: Nutritional therapy in the first week of ICU stay did not affect vital outcome after adjusting for the SOFA score on the day of the evaluation in underweight critically ill patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03398343.

Renal Outcomes of Vasopressin and Its Analogs in Distributive Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the literature and synthesize evidence concerning the effects of vasopressin and its analogs compared with other vasopressors in distributive shock, focusing on renal outcomes. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic review in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials that compared vasopressin and its analogs with other vasopressors and reported renal outcomes in adult patients with distributive shock. DATA EXTRACTION: Paired reviewers independently screened citations, conducted data extraction and assessed risk of bias. Three prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted. Three main outcomes related to acute renal failure were analyzed: the need for renal replacement therapy, acute kidney injury incidence, and acute kidney injury-free days. I test was used to evaluate heterogeneity between studies. Substantial heterogeneity was defined as I greater than 50%. A random-effects model with Mantel-Haenszel weighting was used for all analyses. Heterogeneity was explored using subgroup analysis. The quality of evidence for intervention effects was summarized using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. This study was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42017054324). DATA SYNTHESIS: Three-thousand twenty-six potentially relevant studies were identified, and 30 articles were reviewed in full. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 2,833 individuals. Of these, 11 studies (2,691 individuals) were suitable for quantitative meta-analysis. Overall, the evidence was of low to moderate quality. Patients who received vasopressin and its analogs had a reduced need for renal replacement therapy (odds ratio, 0.59 [0.37-0.92]; p = 0.02; I = 49%) and a lower acute kidney injury incidence (odds ratio, 0.58 [0.37-0.92]; p = 0.02; I = 63%). These results should be interpreted with caution, due to excessive heterogeneity. Acute kidney injury-free data was not pooled, since the small number of studies and extreme heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with distributive shock, vasopressin and its analogs use is associated with a reduced need for renal replacement therapy and lower acute kidney injury incidence. These results are supported by high risk of bias evidence.

Association between vitamin D levels and inflammatory activity in brain death: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D insufficiency is linked to several common inflammatory disorders. Brain death (BD) causes a massive catecholamine release, leading to intense inflammatory activity. We aimed to evaluate vitamin D serum levels in brain-dead individuals in comparison to critically ill patients without BD to assess the correlation between vitamin D and cytokine levels. METHODS: Sixteen brain-dead patients and 32 critically ill controls were prospectively enrolled. Blood samples from 25 brain-dead patients from a previous study were also used for vitamin D quantification. Plasma TNF, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IFN-γ and serum vitamin D levels were compared using Student's t-test or one-way ANOVA. Spearman's test was used to assess the correlation between vitamin D and cytokine levels. RESULTS: Mean vitamin D levels were 16.4 ±â€¯7.9 ng/mL, with 52 patients (71.2%) classified as vitamin D deficient (serum levels < 20 ng/mL). Vitamin D levels were similar in 41 brain-dead patients as compared to control subjects (15.6 ±â€¯6.9 ng/mL vs 17.4 ±â€¯9.0 ng/mL; p = 0.383). Moderate direct correlations were observed between vitamin D and IL-8, IL-10, and IFN-γ in the prospective group of 16 brain-dead patients (IL-8: r = 0.5, p = 0.049; IL-10 r = 0.67, p = 0.005; IFN-γ r = 0.6, p = 0.015). Vitamin D was inversely correlated with IL-6 (r = -0.36, p = 0.044) in critically ill controls. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D serum levels were similarly low in brain-dead and critically ill patients. In brain-dead patients, vitamin D serum levels correlated with plasma IL-8, IL-10 and IFN-γ.

Spontaneous Breathing Trials With T-Piece or Pressure Support Ventilation.

Spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) are among the most commonly employed techniques to facilitate weaning from mechanical ventilation. The preferred SBT technique, however, is still unclear. To clarify the preferable SBT (T-piece or pressure support ventilation [PSV]), we conducted this systematic review. We then searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, SciELO, Google Scholar, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases through June 2015, without language restrictions. We included randomized controlled trials involving adult subjects being weaned from mechanical ventilation comparing T-piece with PSV and reporting (1) weaning failure, (2) re-intubation rate, (3) ICU mortality, or (4) weaning duration. Anticipating clinical heterogeneity among the included studies, we compared prespecified subgroups: (1) simple, difficult, or prolonged weaning and (2) subjects with COPD. We summarized the quality of evidence for intervention effects using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology. We identified 3,674 potentially relevant studies and reviewed 23 papers in full. Twelve studies (2,161 subjects) met our inclusion criteria. Overall, the evidence was of very low to low quality. SBT technique did not influence weaning success (risk ratio 1.23 [0.94-1.61]), ICU mortality (risk ratio 1.11 [0.80-1.54]), or re-intubation rate (risk ratio 1.21 [0.90-1.63]). Prespecified subgroup analysis suggested that PSV might be superior to T-piece with regard to weaning success for simple-to-wean subjects (risk ratio 1.44 [1.11-1.86]). For the prolonged-weaning subgroup, however, T-piece was associated with a shorter weaning duration (weighted mean difference -3.08 [-5.24 to -0.92] d). In conclusion, low-quality evidence is available concerning this topic. PSV may be associated with lower weaning failure rates in the simple-to-wean subgroup. In contrast, in prolonged-weaning subjects, T-piece may be related to a shorter weaning duration, although this is at high risk of bias. Further study of the difficult-to-wean and COPD subgroups is required.

Management of the brain-dead organ donor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The shortage of organs is a limitation for transplantation, making the care of potential organ donors an important issue. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out to assess the efficacy of interventions to stabilize hemodynamics in brain-dead donors or to improve organ function and outcomes of transplantation. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched. Of 5096 articles retrieved, 39 randomized controlled trials were selected. Twenty were included in a qualitative synthesis, providing data on 1277 patients. The main interventions described were desmopressin use, triiodothyronine and methylprednisolone replacement, fluid management, vasopressor therapy, mechanical ventilation strategies, and surgical techniques. RESULTS: Three meta-analyses were conducted: the first included two studies and showed that desmopressin administered to brain-dead patients was not advantageous with respect to early organ function in kidney recipients (relative risk, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-1.10; I(2) = 0%; P = 0.809). The second included four studies and showed that triiodothyronine did not add hemodynamic benefits versus standard management (weighted mean difference, 0.15; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.42; I(2) = 17.4%; P = 0.304). The third meta-analysis (two studies) showed that ischemic liver preconditioning during harvesting procedures did not benefit survival (relative risk, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.93-1.08; I(2) = 0%; P = 0.459). CONCLUSION: The present results suggest limited efficacy of interventions focusing on the management of brain-dead donors.