Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
An Esp Pediatr ; 31(5): 435-9, 1989 Nov.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2694871

RESUMO

A retrospective study of the patients admitted during the last 8 years with status asthmaticus is reported. We compare the requirement of mechanical ventilation with the beta-agonist therapy received and the type of asthma. About 71 patients admitted, 67% were IgE dependent asthmatic (EDA) children and 31% no-IgE dependent asthmatic (nEDA) ones. They needed intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) in 20 instances; no difference was found between both types of asthma. We studied the ventilatory parameters used. The 33% of EDA children was treated using a continuous IV infusion of hexoprenalina, requiring IPPV in 5 (31%) of them. The rest received a continuous IV of isoproterenol, and only the 16% required IPPV. We found isoproterenol to be more effective than hexoprenalina in the treatment of status asthmaticus. Similar results were obtained with the nEDA group. The Downes score was showed to be a good predictor-index scoring system in many cases.


Assuntos
Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Isoproterenol/uso terapêutico , Estado Asmático/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Terapia Combinada , Avaliação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Hexoprenalina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Lactente , Injeções Intravenosas , Ventilação com Pressão Positiva Intermitente , Isoproterenol/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estado Asmático/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...