Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis perceive positive improvements regardless of change in the Cobb angle - Results from a randomized controlled trial comparing a 6-month Schroth intervention added to standard care and standard care alone. SOSORT 2018 Award winner.

BACKGROUND: The Cobb angle is proposed as the "disease process" outcome for scoliosis research because therapies aim to correct or stop curve progression. While the Scoliosis Research Society recommends the Cobb angle as the primary outcome, the Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment prioritises, as a general goal, patient related outcomes over Cobb angle progression. OBJECTIVE: To determine the threshold of change in the Cobb angle in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who perceive improvement in a 6-months randomized controlled trial comparing a Schroth exercise intervention added to the standard of care to the standard of care alone. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of 50 patients with AIS, with curves ranging from 10° to 45°, with or without a brace. Participants with diagnoses other than AIS, surgical candidates or patients who had scoliosis surgery were excluded. The 6-month interventions consisted of Schroth exercises added to standard-of-care (observation or bracing) with daily home exercises and weekly therapy sessions (Schroth) or standard-of-care alone (Control). The anchor method for estimating the minimal important difference (MID) in the largest Cobb angles (LC) was used. Patient-reported change in back status over the 6-month treatment period was measured using the Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale as anchor varying from - 7 ("great deal worse") to + 7 ("great deal better"). Participants were divided into two groups based on GRC scores: Improved (GRC ≥2) or Stable/Not Improved (GRC ≤1). MID was defined as the change in the LC that most accurately predicted the GRC classification as per the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). RESULTS: The average age was 13.4 ± 1.6 years and the average LC was 28.5 ± 8.8 °s. The average GRC in the control group was - 0.1 ± 1.6, compared to + 4.4 ± 2.2 in the Schroth group. The correlation between LC and GRC was adequate (r = - 0.34, p < 0.05). The MID for the LC was 1.0 °. The area under the ROC was 0.69 (0.52-0.86), suggesting a 70% chance to properly classify a patient as perceiving No Improvement/Stable or Improvement based on the change in the LC. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing Schroth treatment perceived improved status of their backs even if the Cobb angle did not improve beyond the conventionally accepted threshold of 5°. Standard of care aims to slow/stop progression while Schroth exercises aim to improve postural balance, signs and symptoms of scoliosis. Given the very small MID, perceived improvement in back status is likely due to something other than the Cobb angle. This study warrants investigating alternatives to the Cobb angle that might be more relevant to patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01610908 . Retrospectively registered on April 2, 2012 (first posted on June 4, 2012 - https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/keydates/NCT01610908 ).

Schroth physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how many patients require treatment to prevent one deterioration? - results from a randomized controlled trial - "SOSORT 2017 Award Winner".

BACKGROUND: Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) support using physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE) for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). All RCTs reported statistically significant results favouring PSSE but none reported on clinical significance. The number needed to treat (NNT) helps determine if RCT results are clinically meaningful. The NNT is the number of patients that need to be treated to prevent one bad outcome in a given period. A low NNT suggests that a therapy has positive outcomes in most patients offered the therapy. The objective was to determine how many patients require Schroth PSSE added to standard care (observation or brace treatment) to prevent one progression (NNT) of the Largest Curve (LC) or Sum of Curves (SOC) beyond 5° and 10°, respectively over a 6-month interval. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a RCT. Fifty consecutive participants from a scoliosis clinic were randomized to the Schroth PSSE + standard of care group (n = 25) or the standard of care group (n = 25).We included males and females with AIS, age 10-18 years, all curve types, with curves 10°- 45°, with or without brace, and all maturity levels. We excluded patients awaiting surgery, having had surgery, having completed brace treatment and with other scoliosis diagnoses. The local ethics review board approved the study (Pro00011552).The Schroth intervention consisted of weekly 1-h supervised Schroth PSSE sessions and a daily home program delivered over six months in addition to the standard of care. A prescription algorithm was used to determine which exercises patients were to perform. Controls received only standard of care.Cobb angles were measured using a semi-automatic system from posterior-anterior standing radiographs at baseline and 6 months.We calculated absolute risk reduction (ARR) and relative risk reduction (RRR). The NTT was calculated as: NNT = 1/ARR. Patients with missing values (PSSE group; n = 2 and controls; n = 4) were assumed to have had curve progression (worst case scenario). The RRR is calculated as RRR = ARR/CER. RESULTS: For LC, NNT = 3.6 (95% CI 2.0-28.2), and for SOC, NNT = 3.1 (95% CI 1.9-14.2). The corresponding ARR was 28% for LC and 32% for the SOC. The RRR was 70% for LC and 73% for the SOC. Patients with complete follow-up attended 85% of prescribed visits and completed 82.5% of the home program. Assuming zero compliance after dropout, 76% of visits were attended and 73% of the prescribed home exercises were completed. CONCLUSIONS: The short term of Schroth PSSE intervention added to standard care provided a large benefit as compared to standard care alone. Four (LC and SOC) patients require treatment for the additional benefit of a 6-month long Schroth intervention to be observed beyond the standard of care in at least one patient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01610908 April 2, 2012.

Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring using low intensity transcranial stimulation to remove post-activation depression of the H-reflex.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) can be used to condition post-activation depression of the H-reflex and simultaneously monitor the integrity of spinal motor pathways during spinal deformity correction surgery. METHODS: In 20 pediatric patients undergoing corrective surgery for spinal deformity, post-activation depression of the medial gastrocnemius H-reflex was initiated by delivering two pulses 50-125ms apart, and the second H-reflex was conditioned by TES. RESULTS: Low intensity TES caused no visible shoulder or trunk movements during 19/20 procedures and the stimulation reduced post-activation depression of the H-reflex. The interaction was present in 20/20 patients and did not diminish throughout the surgical period. In one case, the conditioning effect was lost within minutes of the disappearance of the lower extremity motor evoked potentials. CONCLUSION: Post-activation depression was used to detect the arrival of a subthreshold motor evoked potential at the lower motor neuron. The interaction produced minimal movement within the surgical field and remained stable throughout the surgical period. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first use of post-activation depression during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring to directly assess the integrity of descending spinal motor pathways.

The effect of Schroth exercises added to the standard of care on the quality of life and muscle endurance in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis-an assessor and statistician blinded randomized controlled trial: "SOSORT 2015 Award Winner".

BACKGROUND: In North America, care recommendations for adolescents with small idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) curves include observation or bracing. Schroth scoliosis-specific exercises have demonstrated promising results on various outcomes in uncontrolled studies. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to determine the effect of Schroth exercises combined with the standard of care on quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes and back muscle endurance (BME) compared to standard of care alone in patients with AIS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty patients with AIS, aged 10-18 years, with curves 10-45 °, recruited from a scoliosis clinic were randomized to receive standard of care or supervised Schroth exercises plus standard of care for 6 months. Schroth exercises were taught over five sessions in the first two weeks. A daily home program was adjusted during weekly supervised sessions. The assessor and the statistician were blinded. Outcomes included the Biering-Sorensen (BME) test, Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22r) and Spinal Appearance Questionnaires (SAQ) scores. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) linear mixed effects models were analyzed. Because ITT and PP analyses produced similar results, only ITT is reported. RESULTS: After 3 months, BME in the Schroth group improved by 32.3 s, and in the control by 4.8 s. This 27.5 s difference in change between groups was statically significant (95 % CI 1.1 to 53.8 s, p = 0.04). From 3 to 6 months, the self-image improved in the Schroth group by 0.13 and deteriorated in the control by 0.17 (0.3, 95 % CI 0.01 to 0.59, p = 0.049). A difference between groups for the change in the SRS-22r pain score transformed to its power of four was observed from 3 to 6 months (85.3, 95 % CI 8.1 to 162.5, p = 0.03), where (SRS-22 pain score)(4) increased by 65.3 in the Schroth and decreased by 20.0 in the control group. Covariates: age, self-efficacy, brace-wear, Schroth classification, and height had significant main effects on some outcomes. Baseline ceiling effects were high: SRS-22r (pain = 18.4 %, function = 28.6 %), and SAQ (prominence = 26.5 %, waist = 29.2 %, chest = 46.9 %, trunk shift = 12.2 % and shoulders = 18.4 %). CONCLUSIONS: Supervised Schroth exercises provided added benefit to the standard of care by improving SRS-22r pain, self-image scores and BME. Given the high prevalence of ceiling effects on SRS-22r and SAQ questionnaires' domains, we hypothesize that in the AIS population receiving conservative treatments, different QOL questionnaires with adequate responsiveness are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Schroth Exercise Trial for Scoliosis NCT01610908.

Predicting success or failure of brace treatment for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional spinal deformity. Brace treatment is a common non-surgical treatment, intended to prevent progression (worsening) of the condition during adolescence. Estimating a braced patient's risk of progression is an essential part of planning treatment, so method for predicting this risk would be a useful decision support tool for practitioners. This work attempts to discover whether failure of brace treatment (progression) can be predicted at the start of treatment. Records were obtained for 62 AIS patients who had completed brace treatment. Subjects were labeled as "progressive" if their condition had progressed despite brace treatment and "non-progressive" otherwise. Wrapper-based feature selection selected two useful predictor variables from a list of 14 clinical measurements taken from the records. A logistic regression model was trained to classify patients as "progressive" or "non-progressive" using these two variables. The logistic regression model's simplicity and interpretability should facilitate its clinical acceptance. The model was tested on data from an additional 28 patients and found to be 75 % accurate. This accuracy is sufficient to make the predictions clinically useful. It can be used online: http://www.ece.ualberta.ca/~dchalmer/SimpleBracePredictor.html .

The effect of time on qualitative compliance in brace treatment for AIS.

Brace treatment is the most commonly used non-surgical treatment method for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This study is to determine the force changes exerted by a brace over time during both day and night-time wear and to explore correlations between force changes to bracing outcomes. Twenty subjects (three male, 17 female) diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis who had worn their braces for six months participated into this study. However, due to non-continuous brace wear and exclusion of subjects with large curves (Cobb angle >40 degrees), only nine subjects were included into the day-time analysis and 11 subjects were included into night-time analysis. All subjects used a load monitor system from four days up to 14 days with Boston braces. Cobb angle measurements were taken at initiation of brace treatment as well as after weaning upon completion of the treatment. After the monitoring period, the data was extracted and analyzed. Forces were compared between hours 1, 2, and 5 for the day and night groups, and the correlation of force changes to bracing outcomes were analyzed. In daytime wear, a significant decrease in force over time was found. Most of the decrease occurred within hours 1 and 2 of brace wear. There was no significant decrease during night wear. There were no significant correlations between force decline and outcome.

Intra-observer reproducibility and interobserver reliability of the radiographic parameters in the Spinal Deformity Study Group's AIS Radiographic Measurement Manual.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional assessment of the reproducibility and reliability of radiographic parameters. OBJECTIVE: To measure the intra-examiner and interexaminer reproducibility and reliability of salient radiographic features. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The management and treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) depends on accurate and reproducible radiographic measurements of the deformity. METHODS: Ten sets of radiographs were randomly selected from a sample of patients with AIS, with initial curves between 20 degrees and 45 degrees. Fourteen measures of the deformity were measured from posteroanterior and lateral radiographs by 2 examiners, and were repeated 5 times at intervals of 3-5 days. Intra-examiner and interexaminer differences were examined. The parameters include measures of curve size, spinal imbalance, sagittal kyphosis and alignment, maximum apical vertebral rotation, T1 tilt, spondylolysis/spondylolisthesis, and skeletal age. RESULTS: Intra-examiner reproducibility was generally excellent for parameters measured from the posteroanterior radiographs but only fair to good for parameters from the lateral radiographs, in which some landmarks were not clearly visible. Of the 13 parameters observed, 7 had excellent interobserver reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The measurements from the lateral radiograph were less reproducible and reliable and, thus, may not add value to the assessment of AIS. Taking additional measures encourages a systematic and comprehensive assessment of spinal radiographs.

Changes in alignment of the scoliotic spine in response to lateral bending.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional review studied the posteroanterior and lateral bending radiographs of 26 preoperative patients with thoracic major adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the relation of vertebral axial rotation, apparent vertebral wedging, and disc wedging with lateral bending in patients with severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lateral bending radiographs are used commonly in surgical planning to assess the flexibility of the spine and to establish the placement of instrumentation. However, their use in the assessment of motion in the axial plane has not been clearly established. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from 26 subjects immediately before spinal surgery. All the subjects had adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with right thoracic major curves. Axial rotation, vertebral wedging, and disc wedging were measured from T4 to L4 on left and right supine bending and standing posteroanterior radiographs. The apexes of the major and minor curves, the neutral vertebrae, and the Cobb angles were recorded. RESULTS: No significant differences in axial rotation were found at the thoracic apex, neutral vertebrae, or lumbar apex in response to lateral bending. Most of the wedging occurs in the disc, and is maximal at the apex of the curve. The total amount of wedging was higher in more severe curves. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral bending does not improve axial rotation in severe scoliosis (scoliosis for which surgical correction is advised). Structural changes including disc and vertebral wedging may be responsible for the lack of rotational correction of the scoliotic spine. Lack of axial flexibility in the thoracic region may hamper surgical attempts to correct the deformities of the trunk.