Prevalence of non-organ-specific autoantibodies in a rural community from northeastern Brazil: a population-based study.

Non-organ-specific autoantibodies (NOSA) are well-recognized diagnostic markers of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), but can also be observed in patients with viral hepatitis as well as in healthy subjects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of NOSA in subjects living in a rural community in Brazil and to correlate their occurrence with the presence of liver disease. Seven hundred twenty-five apparently healthy subjects were randomly selected for assessment of antinuclear (ANA), anti-smooth muscle (SMA), antimitochondrial (AMA), anti-liver/kidney microsome type 1, and anti-liver cytosol type 1 antibodies. Subjects with those NOSA were evaluated for the presence of AIH, PBC, and viral hepatitis. Reactivities for all NOSA, SMA, ANA, and AMA were detected, respectively, in 14, 10, 4, and 0.1% of subjects, with a mean titer of 1:40. NOSA-positive subjects were significantly older and more frequently females. No correlation was observed between the occurrence of NOSA and PBC, AIH, or viral hepatitis. The prevalence of NOSA in Brazilians was 14%. They were usually low titer. NOSA were more frequently observed in females and older subjects and their presence was not correlated with the presence of AIH, PBC, or viral hepatitis.

[Determinants of C-reactive protein in individuals with very low socioeconomic status].

BACKGROUND: Low socioeconomic (SE) status has been associated to inflammation and predictors of C-reactive protein (CRP) have been investigated by studies performed in developed countries. This study aimed to identify predictors of CRP in individuals of very low SE level in a developing country and evaluate whether CRP is related to SE status in this scenario. OBJECTIVE: Eight-two individuals of very low SE level were recruited from a poor, semi-rural community in Brazil. Thirty-two individuals of high socioeconomic level comprised a comparison sample. High-sensitivity CRP was measured by nephelometry. METHODS: Eight-two individuals of very low SE level were recruited from a poor, semi-rural community in Brazil. Thirty-two individuals of high socioeconomic level comprised a comparison sample. High-sensitivity CRP was measured by nephelometry. RESULTS: In the low SE individuals, independent predictors of CRP were body mass index > 25 Kg/m(2) (P<0.001), smoking (P=0.005) and acute infection conditions (P=0.049). The low SE group (median=2.02 mg/l; interquartile range 0.92 - 4.95 mg/dl) had higher CRP levels compared to the high SE group (1.16 mg/l, interquartile range 0.55 - 2.50 mg/dl, P=0.03). Body mass index tended to be higher (27 +/- 4.9 kg/m(2) vs 25.5 +/- 3.2 kg/m(2); P=0.07) and the prevalence of acute infection greater (32% vs 3%, P=0.002) in the low SE group. After overweight individuals and those with infectious conditions were excluded, the CRP levels were similar between the groups with low and high SE levels (0.93 mg/l vs 1.08 mg/l, P=0.28). CONCLUSION: Adiposity, infection conditions and smoking are predictors of CRP in individuals with very low SE level. The first two factors determine greater level of inflammation in low SE individuals when compared to the high SE counterparts.

Determinantes do valor da proteína C-reativa em indivíduos de nível sócio-econômico muito baixo / Determinantes del valor de la proteína C reactiva en individuos de nivel socioeconómico muy bajo / Determinants of C-reactive protein in individuals with very low socioeconomic status

FUNDAMENTO: Inflamação sistêmica exacerbada tem sido descrita em indivíduos de baixo nível sócio-econômico, porém estudos sobre determinantes dos valores de proteína C-reativa foram realizados apenas em países desenvolvidos. OBJETIVO: Identificar preditores de PCR em indivíduos de baixo nível SE em um país em desenvolvimento e avaliar se a PCR está relacionada ao nível SE nesse cenário. MÉTODOS: Oitenta e oito indivíduos de nível SE muito baixo foram recrutados de uma comunidade pobre, semi-rural no Brasil; 32 indivíduos de nível SE alto foram utilizados como amostra de comparação. A PCR de alta sensibilidade foi medida por nefelometria. RESULTADOS: Entre os indivíduos de baixo nível SE, os preditores independentes de PCR foram índice de massa corporal > 25 kg/m² (P<0,001), hábito de fumar (P=0,005) e condições infecciosas agudas (P=0,049). O grupo com baixo nível SE (mediana=2,02 mg/l; variação interquartil: 0,92 - 4,95 mg/dl) apresentou níveis mais altos de PCR quando comparado com o grupo de alto nível SE (1,16 mg/l, variação interquartil: 0,55 - 2,50 mg/dl, P=0,03). O índice de massa corporal foi mais alto (27 ± 4,9 kg/m² vs 25,5 ± 3,2 kg/m²; P=0,07) e a prevalência de infecção aguda foi maior (32 por cento vs 3 por cento, P=0,002) no grupo com baixo nível SE. Após exclusão de indivíduos com sobrepeso ou condições infecciosas, os valores de PCR foram similares entre os grupos com baixo e alto nível SE (0,93 mg/l vs 1,08 mg/l, P=0,28). CONCLUSÃO: Adiposidade, condições infecciosas e fumo são preditores de PCR em indivíduos com nível SE muito baixo. Os primeiros dois fatores são os determinantes da exacerbação da inflamação em indivíduos de muito baixo nível SE.

BACKGROUND: Low socioeconomic (SE) status has been associated to inflammation and predictors of C-reactive protein (CRP) have been investigated by studies performed in developed countries. This study aimed to identify predictors of CRP in individuals of very low SE level in a developing country and evaluate whether CRP is related to SE status in this scenario. OBJECTIVE: Eight-two individuals of very low SE level were recruited from a poor, semi-rural community in Brazil. Thirty-two individuals of high socioeconomic level comprised a comparison sample. High-sensitivity CRP was measured by nephelometry. METHODS: Eight-two individuals of very low SE level were recruited from a poor, semi-rural community in Brazil. Thirty-two individuals of high socioeconomic level comprised a comparison sample. High-sensitivity CRP was measured by nephelometry. RESULTS: In the low SE individuals, independent predictors of CRP were body mass index > 25 Kg/m² (P<0.001), smoking (P=0.005) and acute infection conditions (P=0.049). The low SE group (median=2.02 mg/l; interquartile range 0.92 - 4.95 mg/dl) had higher CRP levels compared to the high SE group (1.16 mg/l, interquartile range 0.55 - 2.50 mg/dl, P=0.03). Body mass index tended to be higher (27 ± 4.9 kg/m² vs 25.5 ± 3.2 kg/m²; P=0.07) and the prevalence of acute infection greater (32 percent vs 3 percent, P=0.002) in the low SE group. After overweight individuals and those with infectious conditions were excluded, the CRP levels were similar between the groups with low and high SE levels (0.93 mg/l vs 1.08 mg/l, P=0.28). CONCLUSION: Adiposity, infection conditions and smoking are predictors of CRP in individuals with very low SE level. The first two factors determine greater level of inflammation in low SE individuals when compared to the high SE counterparts.

FUNDAMENTO: Se ha descrito inflamación sistémica exacerbada en individuos de bajo nivel socioeconómico, con todo, estudios sobre determinantes de los valores de proteína C reactiva sólo se han realizado en países desarrollo. OBJETIVO: Identificar predictores de PCR en individuos de bajo nivel SE en un país en desarrollo y evaluar si la PCR está relacionada al nivel SE en ese escenario. MÉTODOS: Se reclutaron ochenta y ocho individuos de nivel SE muy bajo de un comunidad pobre, semi-rural en Brasil, se utilizaron 32 individuos de nivel SE alto como muestra de comparación. La PCR de alta sensibilidad se midió por nefelometría. RESULTADOS: Entre los individuos de bajo nivel SE, los predictores independientes de PCR fueron índice de masa corporal > 25 kg/m² (P<0,001), hábito de fumar (P=0,005) y condiciones infecciosas agudas (P=0,049). El grupo con bajo nivel SE (mediana=2,02 mg/l; variación intercuartil: 0,92 - 4,95 mg/dl) presentó niveles más altos de PCR al compararlo con el grupo de alto nivel SE (1,16 mg/l, variación intercuartil: 0,55 - 2,50 mg/dl, P=0,03). El índice de masa corporal fue más alto (27 ± 4,9 kg/m² vs 25,5 ± 3,2 kg/m²; P=0,07) y la prevalencia de infección aguda fue mayor (32 por ciento vs 3 por ciento, P=0,002) en el grupo con bajo nivel SE. Tras la exclusión de individuos con sobrepeso o condiciones infecciosas, los valores de PCR fueron similares entre los grupos con bajo y alto nivel SE (0,93 mg/l vs 1,08 mg/l, P=0,28). CONCLUSIÓN: Adiposidad, condiciones infecciosas y tabaco son predictores de PCR en individuos con nivel SE muy bajo. Los primeros dos factores son los determinantes de la exacerbación de la inflamación en individuos de muy bajo nivel SE.

Bone mineralization in young patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and screening-identified evidence of celiac disease.

The aims of this study were to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers in patients with type 1 diabetes and screening-identified evidence of celiac disease, i.e., celiac autoimmunity. We screened 50 consecutive type 1 diabetic patients for IgA antitissue transglutaminase to identify those with celiac autoimmunity. Eight seropositive patients were identified on this screening, and 12 patients matched for gender and age range were selected as a control group from among the type 1 diabetic patients without celiac autoimmunity. Patients and controls underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) for measurement of bone mineral status and had their blood levels of osteocalcin, carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX), calcium, and phosphorus determined. BMD was further adjusted for height, weight, and pubertal stage. Radiographic and blood markers of bone mineralization were compared between patients and controls. BMD (Z-score) at the lumbar spine was -1.44 +/- 0.5 SD for patients and 0.04 +/- 0.2 SD for controls (P = 0.02). Bone mineral content was 37.9 +/- 4.5 g for patients and 49.4 +/- 2.6 g for controls (P = 0.049). Adjusted BMD was -0.62 +/- 0.5 SD for patients and 0.81 +/- 0.09 SD for controls (P = 0.04). After adjustment, four patients and none of the controls presented BMD < -1 SD (P = 0.01). Osteocalcin, CTX, calcium, and phosphorus blood levels were not significantly different between patients and controls. Celiac autoimmunity is associated with reduced bone mineralization in type 1 diabetic patients. The pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical relevance of this finding remain to be further investigated.

Bone metabolism is linked to disease duration and metabolic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

UNLABELLED: This cross-sectional study analyzed bone mineral density (BMD) in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1) and its relationship with metabolic control, duration of disease and bone markers. METHODS: Forty-four children and adolescents with DM1 (age 8.8+/-4.4 years, disease duration 6.6+/-3.9 years) and 22 healthy children were assessed for BMD of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; osteocalcin (OC) and carboxy-terminal telopeptide (CTX) were measured in the study group. RESULTS: The BMD was similar in subjects with (-1.15+/-1.2 S.D.) and without DM1 (-0.85+/-0.88 S.D., p=0.25). After adjustment for weight, height and pubertal development, the BMD was <-2.0 S.D. in only two diabetic patients (4.5%). Bone area (BA) was inversely correlated with the duration of diabetes (p=0.03) and HbA1c (p=0.02). In girls, who presented a worse HbA1c than boys (p<0.01), BMD was inversely correlated with HbA1c (p=0.05). OC and CTX levels were higher in boys (p<0.01) and both inversely correlated with pubertal development (p=0.01), but not with BMD. CONCLUSIONS: Children and adolescents with DM1 have normal bone mass in the lumbar spine. However, longer diabetes duration and poor metabolic control may have a negative impact on bone mass, requiring further investigation through longitudinal studies.

Validação da medida de proteína C-reativa de alta sensibilidade (PCR-as) por quimioluminescência para estimativa de risco cardiovascular em indivíduos ambulatoriais: análise comparativa com nefelometria / Validation of C-reactive protein measured by immunoluminometry for cardiovascular risk assessment in the outpatient setting: comparative analysis with nephelometry

FUNDAMENTO: A proteína C-reativa de alta sensibilidade (PCR-as) é um preditor de risco cardiovascular estabelecido no cenário de prevenção primária, de acordo com os métodos de enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) e nefelometria. O método de quimioluminescência tem sensibilidade suficiente para discriminação de baixos níveis de PCR-as, com valor preditor estabelecido em síndromes coronarianas agudas. No entanto este método carece de validação em indivíduos ambulatoriais, cujos valores de PCR são significativamente menores que os de pacientes instáveis. OBJETIVO: Testar a hipótese de que o método de quimioluminescência possui acurácia adequada para mensuração de PCR-as e classificar indivíduos ambulatoriais de acordo com o risco cardiovascular. MÉTODOS: A proteína C-reativa foi medida pelos métodos de quimioluminescência e nefelometria em 152 amostras séricas obtidas de diferentes indivíduos ambulatoriais. Considerando-se a nefelometria o padrão-ouro, a performance do método de quimioluminescência foi avaliada. RESULTADOS: Observou-se forte associação linear entre os dois métodos, ilustrada pelos coeficientes de correlação (r = 0,99; p < 0,001) e regressão (beta = 0,94, 95 por cento C.I. = 0,92 - 0,95, p < 0,001). A diferença média entre os valores de cada método foi - 0,22 ± 0,4mg/l. Em 97 por cento dos indivíduos houve concordância entre os métodos quando à classificação em baixo risco (PCR-as < 1mg/l), risco intermediário (PCR-as = 1-3mg/l) ou alto risco cardiovascular (PCR-as > 3mg/l) (kappa = 0,96; p < 0,001). CONCLUSAO: A medida de PCR-as por quimioluminescência representa uma alternativa ao método nefelométrico na avaliação de risco cardiovascular de indivíduos ambulatoriais.

Correlation between turbidimetric and nephelometric methods of measuring C-reactive protein in patients with unstable angina or non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the turbidimetric method of C-reactive protein (CRP) as a measure of low-grade inflammation in patients admitted with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS). METHODS: Serum samples obtained at hospital arrival from 68 patients (66 11 years, 40 men), admitted with unstable angina or non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction were used to measure CRP by the methods of nephelometry and turbidimetry. RESULTS: The medians of C-reactive protein by the turbidimetric and nephelometric methods were 0.5 mg/dL and 0.47 mg/dL, respectively. A strong linear association existed between the 2 methods, according to the regression coefficient (b=0.75; 95% C.I.=0.70-0.80) and correlation coefficient (r=0.96; P<0.001). The mean difference between the nephelometric and turbidimetric CRP was 0.02 0.91 mg/dL, and 100% agreement between the methods in the detection of high CRP was observed. CONCLUSION: In patients with non-ST elevation ACS, CRP values obtained by turbidimetry show a strong linear association with the method of nephelometry and perfect agreement in the detection of high CRP.

Correlação entre medidas de proteína C-reativa pelos métodos de nefelometria e turbidimetria em pacientes com angina instável ou infarto agudo do miocárdio sem supradesnível do segmento ST / Correlation between turbidimetric and nephelometric methods of measuring C-reactive protein in patients with unstable angina or non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the turbidimetric method of C-reactive protein (CRP) as a measure of low-grade inflammation in patients admitted with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS). METHODS: Serum samples obtained at hospital arrival from 68 patients (66±11 years, 40 men), admitted with unstable angina or non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction were used to measure CRP by the methods of nephelometry and turbidimetry. RESULTS: The medians of C-reactive protein by the turbidimetric and nephelometric methods were 0.5 mg/dL and 0.47 mg/dL, respectively. A strong linear association existed between the 2 methods, according to the regression coefficient (b=0.75; 95 percent C.I.=0.70-0.80) and correlation coefficient (r=0.96; P<0.001). The mean difference between the nephelometric and turbidimetric CRP was 0.02 ± 0.91 mg/dL, and 100 percent agreement between the methods in the detection of high CRP was observed. CONCLUSION: In patients with non-ST elevation ACS, CRP values obtained by turbidimetry show a strong linear association with the method of nephelometry and perfect agreement in the detection of high CRP