Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302548, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728337

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance therapy plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone for adults with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) that had not progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy in France. METHODS: A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to assess the lifetime costs and effects of avelumab plus BSC versus BSC alone. Data from the phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial (NCT02603432) were used to inform estimates of clinical and utility values considering a 10-year time horizon and a weekly cycle length. Cost data were estimated from a collective perspective and included treatment acquisition, administration, follow-up, adverse event-related hospitalization, transport, post-progression, and end-of-life costs. Health outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and life-years gained. Costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at 2.5% per annum. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were used to compare cost-effectiveness and willingness to pay in France. Uncertainty was assessed using a range of sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Avelumab plus BSC was associated with a gain of 2.49 QALYs and total discounted costs of €136,917; BSC alone was associated with 1.82 QALYs and €39,751. Although avelumab plus BSC was associated with increased acquisition costs compared with BSC alone, offsets of -€20,424 and -€351 were observed for post-progression and end-of-life costs, respectively. The base case analysis ICER was €145,626/QALY. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the reference case and showed that efficacy parameters (overall survival, time to treatment discontinuation), post-progression time on immunotherapy, and post-progression costs had the largest impact on the ICER. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrated that avelumab plus BSC is associated with a favorable cost-effectiveness profile for patients with la/mUC who are eligible for 1L maintenance therapy in France.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/economia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , França , Masculino , Feminino , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/economia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/economia , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia , Metástase Neoplásica , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Urológicas/economia , Neoplasias Urológicas/patologia , Quimioterapia de Manutenção/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...