Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 15(3): e0230047, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32187212

RESUMO

AIM: To translate and adapt cross-culturally the De Morton Mobility Index from English to Brazilian Portuguese. Furthermore, to test the content validity, reliability, construct validity, interpretability and responsiveness for older hospitalized patients. METHODS: After we carried out the translation and the cross-cultural adaptation of the De Morton Mobility Index and its administration instructions according to international guidelines, the content validity of De Morton Mobility Index was tested by experienced physiotherapists. In the sequence, the reliability, construct validity, interpretability and responsiveness were tested in a test-retest design with 93 older patients hospitalized in ward for clinical reasons. The reliability was tested by Cronbach's alpha coefficient (internal consistency), standard error measurement (agreement), and interclass correlation coefficients (intra and inter-examiner reliability). The construct validity was tested by Pearson's correlation between the De Morton Mobility Index score and the number of steps. Interpretability was analyzed by determining the minimum detectable change and the floor and ceiling effects (frequency of maximum and minimum scoring). Responsiveness was analyzed by effect size. RESULTS: The Brazilian version of the De Morton Mobility Index was made and adapted. The internal consistency (α = 0.89), reliability intra-(ICC = 0.94) and inter-examiners (ICC = 0.82), agreement were all adequate. The De Morton Mobility Index is validity when correlated with number of steps (r = 0.46). Floor or ceiling effects (<15%) were not observed and the responsiveness was high (ES = 3.65). CONCLUSION: The De Morton Mobility Index has shown adequate reliability, validity, interpretability and responsiveness for the evaluation of the mobility of older hospitalized patients.


Assuntos
Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Limitação da Mobilidade , Atividade Motora/fisiologia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Idoso , Brasil , Feminino , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
2.
J Physiother ; 65(4): 208-214, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31521553

RESUMO

QUESTIONS: Does advice from a physiotherapist about the importance of staying physically active during hospitalisation improve activity, mobility, strength, length of stay, and complications in older inpatients? What barriers to physical activity during hospitalisation do older inpatients perceive? DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation, intention-to-treat analysis, and blinded assessment. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-eight people who were aged > 60 years and admitted to a university hospital ward. INTERVENTION: In addition to usual hospital care, the experimental group received a booklet with content about the deleterious effects of hospitalisation and the importance of staying active during hospitalisation. The control group received usual hospital care only. OUTCOME MEASURES: The amount of physical activity was measured via accelerometry during the hospital admission. Mobility was assessed using the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI), and muscle strength was assessed using a handgrip dynamometer. Length of stay and complications were extracted from hospital records. The barriers to staying active during hospitalisation were investigated via a questionnaire. RESULTS: Accelerometry showed a mean between-group difference of 974 steps/day (95% CI 28 to 1919) in favour of the experimental group. The intervention also increased moderate-intensity physical activity and reduced sedentary time, although these effects might be trivially small. Experimental group participants were about one-fifth as likely to lose mobility during their hospital admission (two of 33) than control group participants (10 of 35), relative risk 0.21 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.90). Effects of the intervention were unclear regarding muscle strength, length of stay and incidence of complications between the groups. Patients reported that the main barriers to remaining active during hospitalisation were dyspnoea, lack of space, and fear of contracting infection. CONCLUSION: In older inpatients, the addition of advice from a physiotherapist about maintaining activity during hospitalisation increases the level of physical activity and prevents loss of mobility. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT03297567.


Assuntos
Exercício Físico , Hospitalização , Pacientes Internados/educação , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Fisioterapeutas , Comportamento Sedentário , Acelerometria , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Resposta de Imobilidade Tônica , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Força Muscular , Método Simples-Cego
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...