Progressive cognitive impairment and familial spastic paraparesis due to PRESENILIN 1 mutation: anatomoclinical characterization.

INTRODUCTION: Autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD) due to presenilin 1 (PSEN1) mutation can induce atypical neurological symptoms such as movement disorders and epileptic seizures in the context of early-onset progressive cognitive impairment. METHODS: This study includes the anatomoclinical description of three patients of two generations of the same family with movement disorders and progressive cognitive impairment. All were evaluated by trained neurologists, underwent protocolized neuropsychological evaluation, and were assessed by structural (magnetic resonance) and functional (SPECT, PET-18FDG, or PET-18F-Florbetapir) brain imaging tests. A molecular genetic study was performed for all patients, and post-mortem confirmatory anatomopathological evaluation for one of them. RESULTS: The three female patients had an age of onset of symptoms of 38-51 years. All developed progressive multidomain cognitive impairment, paraparesis, and dysarthria, two with ophthalmoparesis and one with untriggered epileptic seizures since early stages. Bilateral cortical fronto-parietal atrophy and global cortical hypoperfusion or posterior bilateral hypometabolism were detected. PET-18F-Florbetapir, when performed, was positive for amyloid cortical deposit. The molecular genetic study confirmed the PSEN1 mutation c.869-2 A>G. Postmortem study of one of them confirmed Alzheimer's disease anatomopathological features with classic cotton wool plaques (CWP), including coexistence of amyloid angiopathy and Lewy body co-pathology. DISCUSSION: The phenotype of ADAD due to PSEN1 mutations is very heterogeneous between and across the same family. Family history assessment should include information not only about cognitive decline, but also about movement disorders and untriggered epileptic seizures. Further studies are needed to identify genetic or epigenetic factors that determine phenotypic diversity in this disease.

Correction to: Genetic and clinical characterization of BRCA-associated hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in Navarra (Spain).

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in Figure 2, where the color code of the text boxes is reversed. Figure 2-amended shows the correct color association between the text boxes and the different areas in the map: Navarra, neighbouring communities and other Spanish communities.

Genetic and clinical characterization of BRCA-associated hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in Navarra (Spain).

BACKGROUND: Genetic testing for BRCA1/2 genes is widely used as a strategy to reduce incidence and morbidity of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). The purpose of this study is to analyse the demographic and molecular characteristics of BRCA germline mutations in Navarra, Spain, and to investigate the clinical profile of hereditary and sporadic breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) in the Community. METHODS: The study includes 1246 individuals assessed for BRCA1/2 genetic testing in Navarra, during 2000-2016, and a cohort of BC (n = 4384) and OC (n = 561) from the population-based Navarra Cancer Registry. Distribution and molecular characteristics of BRCA1/2 mutations, as well as, comparative analysis of the clinical course, pathologic features and overall survival (OS) of patients in different risk groups were investigated. RESULTS: BRCA mutation detection rate was 16%, with higher proportion (63%) of BRCA2 families. Nineteen per cent of mutations were recurrent, one of which, BRCA2 c.6024dupG, showed high association to OC. BRCA carriers had double risk (95% CI = 1.04-4.33) of developing multiple malignancies than low risk families and were diagnosed at a much earlier age (16.6 and 11.7 years difference for BC and OC, respectively) when compared to the general population. For BC, BRCA carriers showed a more advanced histological stage, higher risk of bilateral neoplasms (OR = 4.3; 95% CI = 1.3-11.4, for BRCA2 carriers) and worse OS rate at 5-, 10- and 15- years, than women with sporadic tumors. For OC, over 70% of patients of all risk groups showed advanced stages at diagnosis, with the highest among BRCA1 carriers (91%). Furthermore, they also had higher probability of developing ovarian bilateral tumors (OR = 7.8, 95% CI = 1.7-55.7, for BRCA1 carriers) than the general population. Five-year OS rate was worse among women with sporadic OC than BRCA carriers, but it levelled out over the 15-year period. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to national similarities in the HBOC-BRCA1/2 associated mutational spectrum, we identified a recurrent BRCA2 pathogenic variant (c.6024dupG), highly associated to OC in Navarra. Carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations showed a more severe BC and OC phenotype and had a worse overall prognosis when compared to a large cohort of women with sporadic counterpart tumors.

[ACT/AA polymorphism could duplicate the APOE*epsilon4-associated Alzheimer's disease risk]. / El polimorfismo ACT/AA podría duplicar el riesgo de enfermedad de Alzheimer asociado al alelo APOE*epsilon4.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The association between the presence of the allele APOE*epsilon4 (apolipoprotein E) and sporadic Alzheimer disease (AD) has been long established. However, the possible influence of other genetic factors is still under debate. This study investigated the role of the a 1-antichymotrypsin (ACT) gene as a susceptibility factor for developing late-onset AD in the population of Navarra. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group included 98 patients with late-onset AD and 188 control individuals 70-71 years of age. APOE*epsilon2,*epsilon3,*epsilon4 and ACT codon -17*A,*T polymorphisms were analyzed by PCR-RFLP. Statistical analyses were performed determining the chi-square test, using 2 x 2 contingency tables and logistic regression to calculate odds ratios. RESULTS: APOE*epsilon4 allele frequency was significantly higher in AD patients than in controls (odds ratio [OR] = 3.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-5.73; p < 0.001 in heterozygous carriers, and OR = 9.40; 95% CI, 1.84-64.43; p = 0.001 in homozygous individuals). We found no significant differences in the distribution of ACT polymorphisms between AD cases and controls. However, APOE*epsilon4 carriers had a 2.5-fold increased risk of developing AD in the presence of the ACT/AA genotype (OR = 10.13; 95% CI, 1.98-97.81; p < 0.001). The risk difference, however, did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.271). CONCLUSIONS: APOE*epsilon4 heterozygous and homozygous carriers have a 3 and 9 times higher risk, respectively, of developing AD. We could not demonstrate an effect of ACT polymorphisms as a independent risk factor for this disease; however, the ACT/AA genotype seems to act as an additional susceptibility factor, duplicating the APOE*epsilon4-associated AD risk.