Effects of a 12-week supervised resistance training program, combined with home-based physical activity, on physical fitness and quality of life in female breast cancer survivors: the EFICAN randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: This study assessed the effects of 12-week supervised resistance training combined with home-based physical activity on physical fitness, cancer-related fatigue, depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and life satisfaction in female breast cancer survivors. METHODS: A parallel-group, outcome assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial included 60 female breast cancer survivors who had completed their core treatments within the previous 10 years. Through computer-generated simple randomization, participants were assigned to resistance training (RTG; two sessions/week for 12 weeks plus instructions to undertake ≥ 10,000 steps/d) or control (CG; ≥ 10,000 steps/d only). Outcomes were evaluated at baseline and week 12. Muscular strength was assessed with electromechanical dynamometry. A standardized full-body muscular strength score was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included cardiorespiratory fitness, shoulder mobility, cancer-related fatigue, depressive symptoms, HRQoL, and life satisfaction. RESULTS: Thirty-two participants were assigned to RTG (29 achieved ≥ 75% attendance) and 28 to CG (all completed the trial). Intention-to-treat analyses revealed that the standardized full-body muscular strength score increased significantly in the RTG compared to the CG (0.718; 95% CI 0.361-1.074, P < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.04). This increase was consistent for the standardized scores of upper-body (0.727; 95% CI 0.294-1.160, P = 0.001, d = 0.87) and lower-body (0.709; 95% CI 0.324-1.094, P = 0.001, d = 0.96) strength. There was no effect on cardiorespiratory fitness, shoulder flexion, cancer-related fatigue, depressive symptoms, HRQoL, or life satisfaction. The sensitivity analyses confirmed these results. CONCLUSION: and implication for cancer survivors. In female breast cancer survivors who had completed their core treatments within the past 10 years, adding two weekly sessions of supervised resistance training to a prescription of home-based physical activity for 12 weeks produced a large increase in upper-, lower-, and full-body muscular strength, while other fitness components and patient-reported outcomes did not improve. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14601208.

Absolute and Relative Handgrip Strength as Indicators of Self-Reported Physical Function and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors: The EFICAN Study.

BACKGROUND: Although breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent type of cancer in the world, its high survival rate implies that many people live long after the treatments and face their side effects. The physical function (PF) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of people surviving BC decreases significantly, which makes important to identify markers that may be associated with a better health status and prognosis. Previous studies suggest that handgrip strength (HGS) and HGS relative to the body mass index (rHGS) are good indicators of PF and HRQoL in different populations. However, it is unknown whether this applies to BC survivors. This study aimed to evaluate the association of HGS and rHGS with PF and HRQoL in this population. METHODS: Sixty female BC survivors participated. Handgrip strength was assessed with a dynamometer. Arm volume was estimated and upper limb impairments, as well as cancer-related fatigue, depression, life satisfaction and HRQoL, were assessed using standardized questionnaires. RESULTS: Higher levels of HGS and rHGS were associated with higher levels of HRQoL, lower cancer-related fatigue, and fewer problems with the affected arm. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that HGS may be a good indicator of self-reported PF and HRQoL in female BC survivors.

Effectiveness of a Mindfulness and Self-Compassion Standard Training Program versus an Abbreviated Training Program on Stress in Tutors and Resident Intern Specialists of Family and Community Medicine and Nursing in Spain.

Stress is one of the most common problems among healthcare professionals, as they are exposed to potentially stressful and emotionally challenging situations in the workplace. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) training programs have been shown to decrease stress. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of an abbreviated 4-weeks MBSR training program in relation to a standard 8-weeks one on the stress levels. A controlled and randomized clinical trial was designed, in which 112 tutors and resident intern specialists in Family and Community Medicine and Nursing of six Spanish National Health System teaching units (TUs) participated. Participants included in the experimental groups (EGs) received a MBRS training program (standard or abbreviated), while control group (CG) participants did not receive any intervention. The stress levels were assessed by the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) in three different moments during the study: before, immediately after, and 3 months after the intervention. Adjusted covariance analysis (ANCOVA), using pretest scores as the covariate, showed a significant reduction in stress (F(2,91) = 5.165; p = 0.008; η2 = 0.102) in the post-test visit, attributable to the implementation of the standard training program, but without the maintenance of its effects over time. No significant impact of the abbreviated training program on stress levels was observed in the intergroup comparison. A standard 8-weeks MBSR training program aimed at tutors and resident intern specialists in Family and Community Medicine and Nursing produces significant improvements in stress levels compared with the abbreviated intervention and no intervention. New studies about abbreviated training programs are needed to provide effective treatments which improve well-being of these professionals.

¿Es la fuerza de prensión manual un buen indicador de condición física y composición corporal en pacientes con cáncer de mama que han terminado los tratamientos centrales de la enfermedad? Estudio EFICAN / A força de preensão manual é um bom indicador da condição física e da composição corporal em doentes com cancro da mama que completaram os tratamentos centrais da doença? Estudo EFICAN / Is handgrip strength a good indicator of physical fitness and body composition in breast cancer patients who have completed their core treatments? The EFICAN study

Objetivo: evaluar la asociación entre la fuerza de prensión manual (FPM) y diversos parámetros de condición física y composición corporal en mujeres supervivientes de cáncer de mama.Método: se realizó un estudio transversal con los datos basales del ensayo clínico EFICAN (Ejercicio FÍsico para supervivientes de CÁNcer de mama). Participaron 60 mujeres supervivientes de cáncer de mama que habían terminado los tratamientos centrales de la enfermedad en los 10 años previos al comienzo del estudio, que no presentaban enfermedad pulmonar o cardiovascular, cáncer de mama metastásico, ni tenían prevista una intervención para reconstrucción mamaria en un plazo de 3 meses desde el comienzo del estudio. Se evaluó la fuerza de prensión manual mediante dinamometría manual, la fuerza muscular isométrica pico mediante dinamometría electromecánica funcional, el fitness cardiorrespiratorio (VO2máx) se estimó a través del Siconolfi step test, la amplitud de movimiento (ADM) en flexión de hombro mediante goniometría digital, y la composición corporal mediante bioimpedancia.Resultados: se observó una asociación positiva de la FPM con la masa muscular (r=0.423), y con la fuerza isométrica de miembro superior (r=0.523) e inferior (r=0.335), y una asociación negativa de la FPM con el porcentaje de grasa corporal (r=-0.405). Sin embargo, no se encontró asociación entre FPM y VO2máx ni ADM del hombro (P>0.05).Conclusiones: estos resultados sugieren que la FPM puede ser un buen indicador de fuerza muscular, así como de composición corporal en mujeres supervivientes de cáncer de mama. Futuros estudios prospectivos deberán evaluar el valor predictivo de la FPM en esta población. (AU)

Objectives: this study evaluated the association between handgrip strength (HGS) and various parameters of physical fitness and body composition in female breast cancer survivors.Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted with the baseline data from the EFICAN (Ejercicio FÍsico para supervivientes de CÁNcer de mama) clinical trial. 60 female breast cancer survivors who had completed the core treatments of the disease in the 10 years prior to the study beginning, who didn’t have any cardiovascular or pulmonary disease, metastatic breast cancer or awaited breast cancer reconstruction in the following 3 months, participated. Handgrip strength was assessed using a digital dynamometer, peak isometric strength was determined using an electromechanical dynamometer, cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2máx) was estimated through the Siconolfi step test, shoulder flexion mobility was assessed through digital goniometry and body composition was determined using a bioelectrical impedance device.Results: positive associations between HGS and muscle mass (r=0.423), isometric upper-limb (r=0.523) and lower-limb (r=0.335) strength were found, and a negative association between HGS and fat mass percentage (r=-0.405) was also found. However, no associations between HGS and VO2máx or shoulder flexion mobility were found (P>0.05).Conclusions: these results suggest that HGS may be a good indicator of muscular strength and body composition in female breast cancer survivors. Future prospective studies are needed to assess the predictive value of HGS in this population. (AU)

Objetivo: avaliar a associação entre a força de preensão manual (FPM) e vários parâmetros de condição física e composição corporal em mulheres sobreviventes de cancro da mama.Método: foi realizado um estudo transversal utilizando dados de base do ensaio clínico EFICAN (Physical Exercise for Breast Cancer Survivors). Participaram sessenta mulheres sobreviventes de cancro da mama que tinham concluído os tratamentos centrais da doença nos 10 anos anteriores ao início do estudo, que não tinham doenças pulmonares ou cardiovasculares, cancro da mama metastásico, ou que não estavam programadas para se submeterem à reconstrução da mama nos 3 meses seguintes ao início do estudo. A força de preensão manual foi avaliada por dinamometria manual, o pico de força muscular isométrica por meio de dinamometria electromecânica funcional, a capacidade cardiorrespiratória (VO2máx) foi estimada pelo Siconolfi step test, a amplitude de movimento (ADM) em flexão do ombro por meio de goniometria digital, e a composição corporal por bioimpedância.Resultados: observámos uma associação positiva de FPM com massa muscular (r=0,423), e com força isométrica de membro superior (r=0,523) e membro inferior (r=0,335), e uma associação negativa de FPM com percentagem de gordura corporal (r=-0,405). Contudo, não foi encontrada qualquer associação entre FPM e VO2max ou ADM de ombro (P>0.05).Conclusões: estes resultados sugerem que a FPM pode ser um bom indicador da força muscular, bem como da composição corporal das mulheres sobreviventes de cancro da mama. Os futuros estudos prospectivos devem avaliar o valor preditivo do FPM nesta população. (AU)

Comparison of the Effectiveness of an Abbreviated Program versus a Standard Program in Mindfulness, Self-Compassion and Self-Perceived Empathy in Tutors and Resident Intern Specialists of Family and Community Medicine and Nursing in Spain.

Health professionals are among the most vulnerable to work stress and emotional exhaustion problems. These health professionals include tutors and resident intern specialists, due to the growing demand for the former and the high work overload of the latter. Mindfulness training programs can support these professionals during times of crisis, such as the current global pandemic caused by the coronavirus-19 disease. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of an abbreviated Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) and Mindful Self-Compassion (MSC) training program in relation to a standard training program on the levels of mindfulness, self-compassion, and self-perceived empathy in tutors and resident intern specialists of Family and Community Medicine and Nursing. A total of 112 professionals attached to six Spanish National Health System teaching units (TUs) participated in this randomized and controlled clinical trial. Experimental Group (GE) participants were included in the standard or abbreviated MBSR programs. The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), the Self-Compassion Scale short form (SCS-SF), and the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE) were administered three times during the study: before, immediately after, and 3 months after the intervention. Adjusted covariance analysis (ANCOVA), using pretest scores as the covariate, showed a significant increase in mindfulness (F(2,91) = 3.271; p = 0.042; η2 = 0.067) and self-compassion (F(2,91) = 6.046; p = 0.003; η2 = 0.117) in the post-test visit, and in self-compassion (F(2,79) = 3.880; p = 0.025; η2 = 0.089) in the follow-up visit, attributable to the implementation of the standard training program. The standard MBSR and MSC training program improves levels of mindfulness and self-compassion, and promotes long-lasting effects in tutors and resident intern specialists. New studies are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of abbreviated training programs.

Mindfulness in primary care healthcare and teaching professionals and its relationship with stress at work: a multicentric cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Work stress is a common problem among the health personnel of the Spanish National Health System. The objective of this paper is to assess the state of mindfulness among Spanish primary care providers and to evaluate its potential relationship with work stress and basic labor and sociodemographic characteristics. METHODS: Cross-sectional, multi-centric study. Primary care nurses, teachers, teaching collaborators and residents assigned to six Spanish Family Medicine/Family and Community Care Departments were invited to participate (n = 475). A template was designed in Google Forms, including sociodemographic and work-related variables. The state of mindfulness was measured with the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), while work-related stress was measured using an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 10 points. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were carried out, as well as bivariate and multivariate statistics. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 40,14 ± 13.12 (range:23-65 years); 66.9% were women, 42.5% internal medicine residents, 29.3% family physicians, and 20.2% nurses. More than half (54.5%) knew about mindfulness, with 24.0% have received training on it, and 22.5% were usual practitioners. The average level of mindfulness was 127.18 ± 15.45 (range: 89-177). The average score of stress at work was 6.00 ± 2.44; 49.9% (range: 0-10). 49.9% of participants scored 7 or more on the stress at work scale. There was an inverse correlation between the levels of mindfulness (FFMQ total score) and work-related stress (Spearman's r = - 0.155, p = 0.003). Significant relationships between the mindfulness practice and the level of mindfulness (F = 29.80, p < 0.001), as well as between the mindfulness practice and the level of work-related stress (F = 9.68, p = 0.042), were also found. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of mindfulness in primary care health providers were in line with those levels observed in other groups of health professionals. Half of all of the primary care providers suffered from a high degree of stress. Although weak, inverse relationships were observed between levels of mindfulness and stress at work, with lower values of stress at work among those who practiced mindfulness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03629457 .

Effects of a 12-week resistance and aerobic exercise program on muscular strength and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: Study protocol for the EFICAN randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The number of people living with the side effects of breast cancer treatment (eg, loss of muscular mass and muscular strength, upper-limb mobility and disability, lymphedema, cardiac toxicity, and reduced quality of life) is increasing yearly. These consequences can be improved through exercise, specially combining resistance and aerobic training. Previous exercise trials have not been consistent in applying training principles and standardized reporting, and this partly explains the variability in obtained results. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of a 12-week supervised resistance exercise program combined with home-based aerobic exercise, compared with home-based aerobic exercise only, on muscular strength and several aspects of health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors. To maximize transparency, replicability, and clinical applicability, the intervention is described following the consensus on exercise reporting template. METHODS: This study is a parallel-group randomized controlled trial in which 60 female breast cancer survivors, who have completed central treatments of the disease in the last 5 years, will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group that will perform a total of 24 progressive resistance training sessions for 12 weeks (ie, 2 weeks of individual training and 10 weeks of micro-group training) and will be requested to undertake 10,000 steps/d, or a control group that will be requested to undertake 10,000 steps/d, only. Outcomes will be evaluated at baseline and at week 12. Primary outcome measure is peak isometric muscular strength of the lower- and upper-body, assessed with several exercises through an electromechanical dynamometer. Secondary outcomes include cardiorespiratory fitness, upper-joint mobility and disability, health-related quality of life, cancer-related fatigue, depression, life satisfaction, and presence of lymphedema. DISCUSSION: This study aims to investigate the extent to which a 12-week supervised and progressive resistance exercise program, in addition to home-based aerobic physical activity, might improve muscular strength and health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors. The comprehensive description of the intervention will likely contribute to enhancing exercise prescription in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14601208.

Controlled clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of a mindfulness and self-compassion 4-session programme versus an 8-session programme to reduce work stress and burnout in family and community medicine physicians and nurses: MINDUUDD study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Health personnel are susceptible to high levels of work stress and burnout due to the psychological and emotional demands of their work, as well as to other aspects related to the organisation of that work. This paper describes the rationale and design of the MINDUUDD study, the aim of which is to evaluate the effectiveness of a mindfulness and self-compassion 4-session programme versus the standard 8-session programme to reduce work stress and burnout in Family and Community Medicine and Nursing tutors and residents. METHODS: The MINDUDD study is a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial with three parallel arms. Six Teaching Units will be randomised to one of the three study groups: 1) Experimental Group-8 (EG8); 2) Experimental Group-4 (EG4) Control group (CG). At least 132 subjects will participate (66 tutors/66 residents), 44 in the EG8, 44 in the EG4, and 44 in the CG. Interventions will be based on the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program, including some self-compassion practices of the Mindful Self-Compassion (MSC) programme. The EG8 intervention will be implemented during 8 weekly face-to-face sessions of 2.5 h each, while the EG4 intervention will consist of 4 sessions of 2.5 h each. The participants will have to practice at home for 30 min/day in the EG8 and 15 min/day in the EG4. The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), Self-Compassion Scale (SCS), Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ), Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE), and Goldberg Anxiety-Depression Scale (GADS) will be administered. Measurements will be taken at baseline, at the end of the programs, and at three months after completion. The effect of the interventions will be evaluated by bivariate and multivariate analyses (Multiple Linear Regression). DISCUSSION: If the abbreviated mindfulness programme is at least as effective as the standard program, its incorporation into the curriculum and training plans will be easier and more appropriate. It will also be more easily applied and accepted by primary care professionals because of the reduced resources and means required for its implementation, and it may also extend beyond care settings to academic and teaching environments as well. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03629457 ; date of registration: 13.08.2018).

Communication with patients and the duration of family medicine consultations.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the distribution of consultation times, the factors that determine their length, and their relationship with a more participative, patient-centred consulting style. DESIGN: Cross-sectional multicentre study. LOCATION: Primary Healthcare Centres in Andalusia, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 119 tutors and family medicine physician residents. PRINCIPAL MEASUREMENTS: Consultation length and communication with the patient were analysed using the CICCAA scale (Connect, Identify, Understand, Consent, Help) during 436 interviews in Primary Care. RESULTS: The mean duration of consultations was 8.8min (sd: 3.6). The consultation tended to be longer when the physician had a patient-centred approach (10.37±4.19min vs 7.54±2.98min; p=0.001), and when there was joint decision-making (9.79±3.96min vs 7.73±3.42min: p=0.001). In the multivariable model, longer consultations were associated with obtaining higher scores on the CICAA scale, a wider range of reasons for consultation, whether they came accompanied, in urban centres, and a smaller number of daily visits (r2=0.32). There was no correlation between physician or patient gender, or problem type. CONCLUSION: A more patient centred medical profile, increased shared decision-making, a wider range of reasons for consultation, whether they came accompanied, in urban centres, and less professional pressure all seem to be associated with a longer consultation.