Amyloid brain-dedicated PET images can diagnose Alzheimer's pathology with Centiloid Scale.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the Centiloid Scale may be used to diagnose Alzheimer's Disease (AD) pathology effectively with the only use of amyloid PET imaging modality from a brain-dedicated PET scanner. METHODS: This study included 26 patients with amyloid PET images with 3 different radiotracers. All patients were acquired both on a PET/CT and a brain-dedicated PET scanner (CareMiBrain, CMB), from which 4 different reconstructions were implemented. A new pipeline was proposed and used for the PET image analysis based on the original Centiloid Scale processing pipeline, but with only PET images. The Youden's Index was employed to calculate the optimal cutoffs for diagnosis and evaluated by the AUC, accuracy, precision, and recall metrics. RESULTS: The Centiloid Scale (CL) processing pipeline was validated with and without the use of MR images. The CL cutoffs for AD pathology diagnosis on the PET/CT and the 4 CMB reconstructions were 34.4 ±â€¯2.2, 43.5 ±â€¯3.5, 51.9 ±â€¯12.5, 57.5 ±â€¯6.8 and 41.8 ±â€¯1.2 respectively. Overall, for these cutoffs all metrics obtained the maximum score. CONCLUSION: The Centiloid scale applied to PET images allows for AD pathology diagnosis. The CMB scanner can be used with the Centiloid scale to automatically assist in the diagnosis of AD pathology, relieving the large burden of neurodegenerative diseases on a traditional PET/CT.

Objective Image Quality Comparison Between Brain-Dedicated PET and PET/CT Scanners.

As part of a clinical validation of a new brain-dedicated PET system (CMB), image quality of this scanner has been compared to that of a whole-body PET/CT scanner. To that goal, Hoffman phantom and patient data were obtined with both devices. Since CMB does not use a CT for attenuation correction (AC) which is crucial for PET images quality, this study includes the evaluation of CMB PET images using emission-based or CT-based attenuation maps. PET images were compared using 34 image quality metrics. Moreover, a neural network was used to evaluate the degree of agreement between both devices on the patients diagnosis prediction. Overall, results showed that CMB images have higher contrast and recovery coefficient but higher noise than PET/CT images. Although SUVr values presented statistically significant differences in many brain regions, relative differences were low. An asymmetry between left and right hemispheres, however, was identified. Even so, the variations between the two devices were minor. Finally, there is a greater similarity between PET/CT and CMB CT-based AC PET images than between PET/CT and the CMB emission-based AC PET images.

Validation technique and improvements introduced in a new dedicated brain positron emission tomograph (CareMiBrain).

The goal of developing a PET dedicated to the brain (CareMiBrain) has evolved from its initial approach to diagnosis and monitoring of dementias, to the more ambitious of creating a revolutionary clinical pathway for the knowledge and personalized treatment of multiple neurological diseases. The main innovative feature of CareMiBrain is the use of detectors with continuous crystals, which allow a high resolution determination of the depth of annihilation photons interaction within the thickness of the scintillation crystal. The technical validation phase of the equipment consisted of a pilot, prospective and observational study whose objective was to obtain the first images (40 patients), analyze them and make adjustments in the acquisition, reconstruction and correction parameters, comparing the image quality of the CareMiBrain equipment with that of the whole-body PET/CT. Thanks to the team meetings and the joint analysis of the images, it was possible to detect its weak points and some of its causes. The calibration, acquisition and processing processes, as well as the reconstruction, were optimized, the number of iterations was set to achieve the best signal-to-noise ratio, the random correction was optimized and a post-processing algorithm was included in the reconstruction algorithm. The main technical improvements implemented in this phase of technical validation carried out through collaboration of the Services of Nuclear Medicine and Neurology of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos with the Spanish company Oncovision will be exposed in a project financed with funds from the European Union (Horizon 2020 innovation program, 713323).

Contralateral hearing aid use in cochlear implanted patients: multicenter study of bimodal benefit.

CONCLUSION: The use of a hearing aid (HA) in combination with a cochlear implant (CI) significantly improved performance for speech perception in quiet, in noise, and for localization compared with monaural conditions. No significant differences in functional performance were observed following optimization of HA fitting. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the binaural benefits derived from using a contralateral HA in conjunction with a CI in subjects with significant functional hearing in the nonimplanted ear and the effects of HA fitting optimization. METHODS: Fifteen adult CI users, intra-subject controls, were enrolled in a prospective repeated-measure multicenter study. Evaluation of performance for speech understanding, localization, and subjective impressions was conducted before and following HA fitting optimization for CI alone, HA alone, and CI + HA. RESULTS: For speech testing in quiet, bimodal scores were significantly better than for HA alone and CI alone conditions (p < 0.01). For speech and noise (S0N0) at 0° azimuth the scores were significantly better in the bimodal condition than for CI alone (p = 0.01), indicating binaural summation. When noise was presented to the HA side (S0NHA) bimodal scores were significantly better than for CI alone (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively), suggesting a significant binaural squelch effect. Sound localization ability was significantly improved in the bimodal condition compared with the CI alone condition (p = 0.002).