Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
ScientificWorldJournal ; 2015: 828794, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25861682

RESUMO

The aim of this RCT was to evaluate plaque control and gingival health promotion effectiveness of a new toothbrush with extra-soft filaments in postsurgical sets. Ten consecutive patients with at least two scheduled symmetrical periodontal surgeries were selected. Following the first periodontal surgery, a test (TB1) or control (TB2) toothbrush was randomly assigned. After the second surgery, the remaining toothbrush was given. Patients were asked to gently wipe the surgical area from days 3 to 7 postoperatively and to gently brush using a roll technique from day 7 till the end of the study. Baseline evaluation took place on the day of surgery and follow-ups were performed at days 7, 14, and 30 postoperatively. A more evident PI reduction was recorded for test toothbrush where a regular decrease was observed till day 14; then, this parameter tended to stabilize, remaining however lower than that recorded for the control toothbrush. There were no statistical differences in the GI between test and control toothbrushes. All patients introduced the test toothbrush at surgical site at third day; the control toothbrush was introduced within a mean of 9 days. The introduction of the test toothbrush 3 days after periodontal surgery may be recommended.


Assuntos
Satisfação do Paciente , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Escovação Dentária , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos
2.
Int J Dent Hyg ; 5(4): 242-6, 2007 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17927638

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this single-blind clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of an innovative manual toothbrush versus a traditional one. METHODS: The toothbrushes were randomly assigned to 30 volunteers in a student population of the Dental School of the University of Bologna, Italy, divided into 15 test and 15 control subjects. A clinical examination assessing Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI) and buccal Gingival Recessions was performed at baseline, 3 and 6 months. During the baseline examination, each subject received dental debridement, oral hygiene instructions and a standard kit containing: three standard tubes of toothpaste, 1 hourglass (2 min) and one plaque disclosing solution; each subject of the test group received three innovative toothbrushes, while each subject of the control group received three traditional toothbrushes. RESULTS: During the 6 months of observation both groups presented a PI and GI decrease. A more evident improvement of both indices was observed in the test group (PI P = 0.0001, GI P = 0.0001). The greatest part of recessions remained stable (0-3 months: 70% test group, 60% control group and 3-6 months: 86% test group, 94% control group). Some amplitude modifications (0.5 mm) were mainly detected in the first 3 months (control group chi(2) = 17.55, P = 0.0001 and test group chi(2) = 3.31, P = 0.07). They always increased in the control group and decreased in the study group. CONCLUSIONS: The innovative manual toothbrush is more likely to be effective in reducing PI and GI compared to the traditional one and widely safe on periodontal tissues during the period of observation.


Assuntos
Placa Dentária/terapia , Higiene Bucal/instrumentação , Escovação Dentária/instrumentação , Adulto , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Retração Gengival/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Higiene Bucal/métodos , Escovação Dentária/efeitos adversos , Cremes Dentais/uso terapêutico
3.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 136(7): 877-82, 2005 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16060468

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Up-to-date studies are needed on the protection provided by face masks used by dentists. We assessed the relative filtering efficacy of two currently used surgical face masks (one a molded mask, the other a tie-on mask) and a certified personal particulate respirator, all made by a single manufacturer. METHODS: The authors sprayed bicarbonate particulate against a porcelain surface (representing the patient's mouth) and collected it via a mannequin head (representing the dentist's head) placed 40 centimeters away and a tube with two airflow rates (0.5 cubic meters per hour and 9 m3/hour). They calculated the dry residue weight. They performed three separate runs for each mask and three runs with no mask at the two airflow rates with and without aerosol. RESULTS: With no mask (control), the authors recorded significant weight gains at both airflow rates with and without vaporization. With vaporization, the three masks were associated with different dry residue weights (P < .03 with the Kruskal-Wallis test at both flow rates), the respirator propviding the lowest amount. The respirator provided an efficiency of 94 to 96 percent, compared with 90 to 92 percent and 85 to 86 percent for the molded and tie-on surgical masks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide independent evidencependent evidence that a certified personalthat a certified personal respirator can be more effective than high quality surgical masks in dental settings. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dentists should be aware that a certified particulate respirator can provide them with superior filtering protection.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados , Consultórios Odontológicos , Inalação/fisiologia , Máscaras/normas , Aerossóis , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Desenho de Equipamento , Filtração/instrumentação , Filtração/normas , Humanos , Manequins , Exposição Ocupacional , Dispositivos de Proteção Respiratória/normas , Bicarbonato de Sódio/análise , Ventilação , Volatilização
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...