CEFTO-CURE study: CEFTObiprole Clinical Use in Real-lifE - a multi-centre experience in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Ceftobiprole is approved in Europe for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in adults. Real-world data are limited. METHODS: This multi-centre, observational, ambispective investigator-initiated study was undertaken in Italy from January 2018 to December 2019 in order to evaluate the use of ceftobiprole in a real-world setting. RESULTS: Overall, 195 patients from 10 centres were evaluated (68% retrospectively). Male sex was prevalent (n=121, 62%). Median age was 67 [interquartile range (IQR) 53-75] years. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 5 (IQR 3-7). The most common indication was pneumonia (151/195, 77%), especially HAP. Other uses were skin and soft tissue infections (5%), endocarditis (4%) and bone infections (4%). Ceftobiprole was usually an empiric choice (65%), in combination with other drugs (66%) and as second-line therapy (58%). A causative agent was found in 39% of cases. A diagnosis of sepsis was made in 59 cases (30%). Success in the clinically evaluable population (excluding 12 cases due to isolation of pathogens outside ceftobiprole's spectrum of activity) was obtained in 79% of cases, with all-cause mortality of 20%. On multi-level analysis, three predictors were positively associated with clinical success: male gender, pneumonia and detection of causal agent. Sepsis was a negative predictor. Nine factors were independently associated, favourably or unfavourably, with fatal outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftobiprole is a safe and effective therapeutic choice, even in a real-world setting. More data are needed to establish its efficacy in patients with sepsis.

Casirivimab/imdevimab + remdesivir in hospitalized patients with severe Covid-19: A single centre experience.

Since 2020, COVID-19 pandemic has spread worldwide causing a huge number of cases and casualties. Among direct anti SARS-CoV-2 agents available for the treatment of COVID-19, only remdesivir and casirivimab/imdevimab have been approved for severe disease. As they act at different levels in blocking viral replication, it is theoretically possible to combine them. In this case series we describe tolerability, safety and effectiveness in a small group of 14 patients of the combination of casirivimab/imdevimab monoclonal antibodies with the polymerase inhibitor remdesivir for the treatment of severe COVID-19. We conducted a retrospective study among consecutive patients admitted to the Infectious Disease ward of the University of Naples (Italy) Hospital for COVID-19 that received the combination of casirivimab/imdevimab and remdesivir for the treatment of severe COVID-19 from the August 1, 2021 to the November 30, 2021. During the study period, 78 patients were admitted for severe COVID-19. Fourteen patients (18%) received the combination casirivimab/imdevimab and remdesivir. They were five males and nine females with a median age of 54 years. Eight patients had significant comorbidities; three patients were in the immediate post-partum period. No adverse drug reaction was observed. All patients except one improved clinical condition and respiratory parameters within seven days following the therapy. All patients were discharged in good conditions.

Microbiota and hepatitis C virus in the era of direct-acting antiviral agents.

The gut microbiota plays a fundamental role in Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)-related liver disease. Indeed, HCV infection alters the gut microbiota, whereas intestinal dysbiosis induces an underlying inflammatory state. This status may lead to liver disease progression. The advent of direct acting antivirals (DAAs) was a turning point in the history of HCV infection, which enhances the chances of recovery. Beyond the elimination of the virus, DAA therapy can affect the gut microbiota of the HCV patient. The study of the gut microbiota in the patient with HCV-related liver disease could be the first step in understanding the etiopathogenesis of hepatopathy thereby opening the way to new therapeutic opportunities. Herein we evaluate current knowledge regarding the gut microbiota in patients with HCV infection and the impact of DAA therapy.

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Pangenotypic Direct-Acting Antivirals Against Hepatitis C Virus Infection.

BACKGROUND: Advances in the development of Direct-Acting Antivirals (DAAs), particularly pangenotypic drugs, have led to a high rate of hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication. Notably, real- world studies have confirmed the efficacy and safety of pangenotypic DAA combinations reported in registration trials. The aim of this study was to review the treatment recommendations, and the efficacy and safety data of anti-HCV pangenotypic drugs reported in registration clinical trials and in recent real-life cohort studies. METHODS: We reviewed the efficacy and safety data of pangenotypic anti-HCV drug combinations reported in original articles and in online conference abstracts. RESULTS: Current pangenotypic drug combinations resulted in very high rates of sustained virologic response and few adverse reactions in real-life settings. SVR12 rates in real-life studies ranged from 90-100% depending on the pangenotypic combination, the HCV genotype and the stage of liver disease. Most adverse reactions reported in real-life settings were mild in intensity and rarely led to treatment discontinuation. These results are in accordance with those of clinical trials. CONCLUSION: Pangenotypic DAAs result in very high rates of sustained virologic responses and are well tolerated. However, they are contraindicated in patients with decompensated cirrhosis or advanced chronic kidney disease who failed previous DDA-based treatment. Further research is required to customize treatment to "unpackage" current DAA combinations and to develop generic drugs against HCV.

Management of chickenpox in pregnant women: an Italian perspective.

Chickenpox is a highly contagious disease caused by primary infection of varicella zoster virus (VZV). The disease is spread worldwide and is usually benign but, in some groups of population like pregnant women, can have a severe outcome. Due to a not optimal vaccination coverage, a relatively high number of childbearing-aged women in a European country such as Italy tested seronegative for VZV and so are currently at risk of acquiring chickenpox during pregnancy, especially if they live in contact with children for family or work reasons. Only few data are available about the risk of infection in this setting: the incidence of chickenpox may range from 1.5 to 4.6 cases/1000 childbearing females and from 1.21 to 6 cases/10,000 pregnant women, respectively. This review is aimed to focus on the epidemiology and the clinical management of exposure to chickenpox during pregnancy. Particular emphasis is given to the accurate screening of childbearing women at the time of the first gynecological approach - the females who tested susceptible to infection can be counseled about the risks and instructed on procedure should contact occur - and to the early prophylaxis of the at-risk exposure. Lastly, the achievement of adequate vaccination coverage of the Italian population remains a cornerstone in the prevention of chickenpox in pregnancy.