Mitochondrial changes induced by trimetazidine in the myocardium.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess the effect of trimetazidine (TMZ) on mitochondrial alterations induced in a canine model of brief, repeated episodes of ischemia. MATERIAL/METHODS: Twelve crossbred dogs were analyzed, after double-blind randomization, to a 7-day treatment with either TMZ or placebo. Twenty brief, complete occlusions of the left anterior descending coronary artery were performed. Mitochondrial analysis entailed a qualitative (percentage of mitochondrial damage, merging, pairing, vacuoles, and lipofucsin granules) and a quantitative size analysis (major and minor axes, perimeter, and area) of the mitochondria in the ischemic and control zones. RESULTS: Comparative study of the control zones revealed an increase in lipofucsin granules in the TMZ series and a greater percentage of damaged mitochondria and vacuoles. The control-zone mitochondria treated with TMZ presented a significant increase in the perimeter and major axis and a decrease in the minor axis (p<0.005). No significant differences were found between the series in the qualitative analysis of mitochondrial damage in the ischemic zone. The mitochondria in the TMZ series presented a greater major axis and perimeter than those in the placebo series (p<0.05), which presented a smaller minor axis. CONCLUSIONS: TMZ made the mitochondria adopt an elongated, "rod-like" morphology in both the control and ischemic zones. This is interpreted as an increase in the membrane surface. In the non-ischemic zone, TMZ produced an increase in mitochondrial turnover. There were no differences in the myocardium subjected to ischemia in both series in terms of observable mitochondrial damage.

[Antithrombotic treatment in hypertensive patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. CARDIOTENS 99 study]. / Empleo de fármacos antitrombóticos en pacientes hipertensos con fibrilación auricular crónica. Estudio CARDIOTENS 99.

BACKGROUND: Our main goals were to know the actual degree of oral anticoagulation and antiaggregation in hypertensive patients with atrial fibrillation in the daily clinical practice in Spain and to analyze any differences between primary care physicians and cardiologists. PATIENTS AND METHOD: 32,051 outpatients attended the same day by 1,159 physicians (21% cardiologists) were prospectively included in a database taking into account a history of hypertension and atrial fibrillation, demographic data and ongoing treatments. RESULTS: Hypertension was detected in 10,555 patients and 999 of them had both hypertension and atrial fibrillation (9.46%: 435 males [44%] and 564 females [56%]). 53% patients were attended by primary care physicians and the rest by cardiologists. 33% of hypertensive patients with atrial fibrillation were on oral anticoagulation: 41% of them attended by cardiologists and 26% by primary care physicians (p < 0.05). These differences persisted when the patients were compared on the basis of their age. 39% of hypertensive patients were on oral antiaggregation treatment, without differences in both groups except for those aged less than 65 years who were found to receive more antiaggregation in primary care (36% vs 24%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of atrial fibrillation in hypertensive patients is about 10%; there is a suboptimal degree of utilization of oral anticoagulation, which is more evident in patients attended by primary care physicians; elderly patients (> 80 years-old) were found to receive less anticoagulants and more antiaggregants both in primary health-care and cardiology health-care.