Effects of the Bethesda System on the rate of unsatisfactory Pap smears in spontaneous cervical screening.

AIMS: In 1990, The Bethesda System (TBS) was introduced into spontaneous cervical screening practice in Ravenna, Italy. Negative/benign reports with the recommendation for early repeat smears (RERS) due to some limitation in sample adequacy were considered no longer acceptable. A monitoring program for the rate of unsatisfactory smears (UNS) was implemented. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of such changes in the screening procedure. METHODS: The frequency of UNS in 1990 was compared with that of UNS+RERS in 1988 (assumed as a baseline year) by the calculation of the standardized rate ratio with the 95% confidence interval (CI). The trend in the standardized rate of UNS from 1990 to 1994 was evaluated by the calculation of the average annual variation with the 95% CI. RESULTS: The immediate effect of TBS (1990; 1988 comparison) was a significant increase in the rate of UNS attributable to scant cellularity, poor fixation and thick areas (rate ratio, 2.35; 95% CI, 2.18 to 2.53) and to the absence of endocervical component (1.45; 95% CI, 1.30 to 1.60). The rate of UNS attributable to the presence of cytolysis, inflammation, blood and foreign material decreased by about 6 times (0.16; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.19). The midterm effect of TBS (trend from 1990 to 1994) was a decrease in the total rate of UNS by an average of 2.3% per year. The downward trend was significant for smears showing scant cellularity, poor fixation and thick areas (-1.5% per year) and the absence of endocervical component (-0.7% per year). UNS attributable to the presence of cytolysis, inflammation, blood and foreign material stabilized. CONCLUSIONS: TBS led to a substantial change in the type of information provided by the cytology report (immediate effect). The monitoring program according to TBS led to a reduction in UNS attributable to sample taker (midterm effect).

Self-selection for mammography and breast cancer incidence by stage.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: In the field of breast cancer control, obtaining population-based data on spontaneous mammography (MG) screening should be a priority. This study focuses on the breast cancer incidence and stage distribution in relation to MG use in Ravenna (Italy), 1987-88. METHODS: We estimated the MG rates, expected (E) incidence based on mortality data, observed (O) incidence, predicted excess incidence based on MG rates, observed excess incidence, and stage distribution according to the MG history. RESULTS: The highest MG rate (37%) was found among residents aged 40-44 but none of these had a T1a-bNO breast cancer diagnosed nor was the predicted excess incidence demonstrated. Between 45 and 64 years, 80% of self-selected screenees had repeat ("incidence") MG and the O:E incidence ratio was 1.32 (95% CI 1.09-1.58). The observed excess incidence was 3.8-fold (95% CI 2.56-5.16) greater than that predicted. Advanced (T2+ and/or N1+) cases accounted for 42% of patients diagnosed within 3 years of their last MG, for 55% of those diagnosed more than 3 years after their last MG, and for 70% of those with no previous MG. Above age 70, a significant worsening of stage at diagnosis was associated with a clearcut drop self-referral for MG. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that self-selection and its implications are major features of spontaneous screening practice.

Performance of fineneedle aspiration cytology of the breast. Clinical experience in Ravenna (Italy).

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Fineneedle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a routine test in the evaluation of breast lesions. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of mammography (MG), physical examination (PE), ultrasonography (US) and FNAC in 1064 histologically confirmed breast lesions (638 malignant, 426 benign) observed consecutively at the Cancer Prevention Center of Ravenna (Italy). METHODS: The performance of each test and the additional contribution of FNAC were determined. RESULTS: FNAC was done in 69.6% of cancers and 39.7% of benign lesions (P = 0.00000), the frequency of aspiration being significantly associated with severity at MG, PE, and US. For FNAC, the true positive rate was 95.1% and the true negative rate 67.4%. Only one breast cancer case was detected by FNAC alone (additional true positive rate 0.2%). The positive predictive value of FNAC in the absence of other abnormalities was 5%. The negative predictive value of a benign report at MG, PE, US and FNAC was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: All breast lesions should be evaluated by all available techniques, especially FNAC, and open biopsy should be avoided for those reported as benign at all tests.