[Investigation the contents of employment consultation and support in a cancer center hospital].

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to analyze and categorize the actual situation of employment consultation and support according to consultation times or employment status at the Consultation Support Center of the National Cancer Center Hospital of Japan. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the patient backgrounds, consultation contents, and the number of employment consultation cases conducted at the Consultation Support Center of the National Cancer Center Hospital during a 6-month period from May to December 2018. RESULTS: During the study period, 117 patients (male: female = 46:71) visited the Consultation Support Center. The median age of patients was 48 years old. The most common primary cancer site was the breast in 28 patients followed by the lung in 16 patients, and then gynecologic cancer in 10 patients. The most common cancer treatment was chemotherapy in 53 patients (45.3%), and 12 patients (10.2%) were recurrent patients. Fifty-two patients were in regular employment, 24 were unemployed, 17 were of unknown employment status, 16 were in non-regular employment, and 8 were classified/categorized as other. In terms of working status, 40 were on leave, 35 were working, 15 were seeking work, 8 were unemployed, and 19 were categorized as other. The median number of consultations was 1 (1,11). The content of consultations was the social security system in 44 cases (37.6%) job seeking in 24 cases (20.5%), how to inform the workplace in 14 cases (12%), and workplace environment adjustment in 13 cases (11.1%). CONCLUSIONS: We conducted a survey on the actual status of employment consultation in a cancer center hospital. The majority of consultations were completed in one session. In terms of the content of consultations, there was a high need for consultations on the social security system and job seeking. Further study is needed on the characteristics of employment consultations according to employment status and other attributes.

A Content Analysis of Multidimensional Support Needs Regarding Fertility Among Cancer Patients: How Can Nonphysician Health Care Providers Support?

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify support needs among young cancer patients regarding fertility-related issues to describe multidimensional support provided by nonphysician health care providers. METHODS: Participants were cancer patients and their families who contacted the Hotline for Cancer Treatment and Reproduction at National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan. Medical charts were analyzed through content analysis. RESULTS: A total of 51 participants met the inclusion criteria, of which 32 cases (63%) involved patients themselves, 13 (25%) patients' family members, and 6 (12%) both patients and their families. About patients' demographic status, 40% of the patients were female and 28% were in their thirties. Gynecological and breast cancer patients were the majority, and 24 patients (47%) had not yet started cancer treatment. As a result of content analysis regarding support needs, 9 categories and 55 codes were extracted. The categories included information about risk of infertility, information about means to maintain reproductive function, referral to specialists, support for economic burden, support for worry about cancer progression, support for psychological distress upon facing the risk of infertility, support for communication with oncologists, support for family relationships, and decisional aid. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that nonphysician health care providers should acquire knowledge about fertility preservation and provide psychological support within their specialties.

The effects of an educational program for non-physician health care providers regarding fertility preservation.

PURPOSE: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Clinical Practice guidelines recommend that physicians, nurses, social workers, and other health care providers should be prepared to discuss the risk of infertility with patients. We conducted an educational program for non-physician health care providers regarding fertility preservation and evaluated the effects of the educational program. METHODS: The 4-h educational program consisted of lectures about infertility as a potential risk of cancer treatment, fertility preservation, and psychosocial support. Knowledge, confidence, institutional change, and self-practice were assessed pre-program, immediately post-program, and 6 months post-program. RESULTS: Of 124 participants who joined the program, 74 completed and returned the follow-up survey 6 months after the program. Sixty-one percent of the participants were nurses, 27% were social workers, and 4% were psychologists. The scores for confidence and knowledge increased between pre- and immediate post-program periods (p < 0.01), and between pre- and 6-month post-program periods (p < 0.01). The knowledge score was 52, 76, and 71% at the 3 points respectively. The participants became more likely to disseminate fertility preservation counseling at their institutions (p < 0.01) and use informational resources (p < 0.01). Overall, self-practice and institutional support did not change. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed that this educational program is applicable for non-physicians to learn about fertility preservation. The participants improved significantly in confidence and knowledge, but not in counseling skills.