Association between motivation and engagement with changes in cognition and symptoms after digital cognitive training in schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Digital cognitive training can remediate cognitive deficits present in schizophrenia. However, limited motivation and engagement may impact adherence to training. Therefore, identifying factors that may enhance (facilitators) or decrease (barriers) engagement in digital cognitive training and possibly modulate its effects are of great clinical relevance. METHODS: We measured cognition, symptom severity, motivation (semi-structured interview), and engagement (adapted Utrecht Work Engagement Scale - UWES) of 27 patients with schizophrenia after a 40-h digital cognitive training. The interview transcript quotes were coded and categorized into facilitators and barriers. Thereafter, we tested the association of motivation and engagement with changes in cognition and symptoms after training. RESULTS: The facilitator 'good performance' and the barrier 'difficult exercise' were associated with larger gains in attention (p = 0.03) and reasoning and problem solving (p = 0.02), respectively. 'Poor performance' was associated with smaller gains in global cognition (p < 0.01), attention (p = 0.03), and working memory (p = 0.02). The facilitator 'welcoming setting' was associated with larger reductions in the negative (p = 0.01) and total (p = 0.01) symptoms measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. The UWES engagement scale was associated with different facilitators and barriers that emerged from the interview, an indication of consistency among both qualitative and quantitative assessments. DISCUSSION: Using a mixed quantitative and qualitative research design, we showed associations between motivation and engagement and the response to digital cognitive training in schizophrenia. Facilitators and barriers were associated with engagement, gains in cognition, and reduced symptoms after the intervention, providing insights on how to increase engagement in the digital cognitive training delivered to subjects with schizophrenia.

Changes in emotion processing and social cognition with auditory versus visual neuroscience-informed cognitive training in individuals with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Neuroscience-informed cognitive training has been used to remediate cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, but their effect on emotion processing and social cognition deficits, which may involve auditory and visual impairments, remain relatively unknown. In this study, we compared the efficacy of auditory versus visual neuroscience-informed cognitive training on emotion processing and social cognition in individuals with schizophrenia. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind clinical trial, 79 participants with chronic schizophrenia performed 40-hours auditory or visual dynamically equivalent computerised cognitive training. We assessed emotion processing and social cognition using Emotion Recognition, Affective Go-NoGo, Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional-Intelligence, Theory of mind, and Hinting tests before and after 20 h and 40 h of training. RESULTS: After training, participants from both groups decreased their reaction time for facial emotion recognition (p = 3 × 10-6, d = 0.9). This was more remarkable for the auditory group when analysing individual emotions. Both groups also reduced omissions in the affective go-no go (p = 0.01, d = 0.6), which was also attributed, post hoc, to the auditory group. Trends for improvement were observed in theory of mind (p = 0.06, d = 0.6) for both groups. Improvement in emotion processing was associated with improvement in reasoning and problem solving and global cognition and improvement in theory of mind was associated with improvement in attention and global cognition. CONCLUSIONS: Both the auditory and the visual neuroscience-informed cognitive training were efficacious at improving emotion processing and social cognition in individuals with schizophrenia, although improvement was more remarkable for the auditory training group. These improvements were related to cognitive - but not symptom - improvement.

Auditory versus visual neuroscience-informed cognitive training in schizophrenia: Effects on cognition, symptoms and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairments are related to deficits in primary auditory and visual sensory processes in schizophrenia. These impairments can be remediated by neuroscience-informed computerized cognitive trainings that target auditory and visual processes. However, it is not clear which modality results in greater improvements in cognition, symptoms and quality of life. We aimed to investigate the impact of training auditory versus visual cognitive processes in global cognition in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: Seventy-nine schizophrenia participants were randomly assigned to either 40 h of auditory or visual computerized training. Auditory and visual exercises were chosen to be dynamically equivalent and difficulties increased progressively during the training. We evaluated cognition, symptoms and quality of life before, after 20 h, and after 40 h of training. ClinicalTrials.gov (1R03TW009002-01). RESULTS: Participants who received the visual training showed significant improvements in global cognition compared to the auditory training group. The visual training significantly improved attention and reasoning and problem-solving, while the auditory training improved reasoning and problem-solving only. Schizophrenia symptoms improved after training in both groups, whereas quality of life remained unchanged. Interestingly, there was a significant and positive correlation between improvements in attention and symptoms in the visual training group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the visual training and the auditory training are differentially efficient at remediating cognitive deficits and symptoms of clinically stable schizophrenia patients. Ongoing follow-up of participants will evaluate the durability of training effects on cognition and symptoms, as well as the potential impact on quality of life over time.