[The principles in the evaluation of the efficacy of health and social interventions]. / I principi nella valutazione scientifica dell'efficacia degli interventi socio-sanitari resi facili per tutti: le 10 C.

The 10 Cs are a reminder of the principles that should lead any evaluation of the efficacy (i.e. the capacity to attain the specific objectives, in case of health services better health outcomes) of any intervention. They are: 1. Comparison with other treatment; 2. Comparability of compared groups; 3. Comparability of data collection; 4. Completeness of collected outcomes; 5. Completeness of follow-up; 6. Consistency of treatments; 7. Casuality (consideration of); 8. Consistency of investigated patients with patients who are treated in daily practice; 9. Continuity of surveillance; 10. Costs. The paper describes the almost total lack of effective treatments and of methods to test their efficacy till the beginning of 1800 and the gradual raise of the randomised controlled trial as the gold standard method for such an evaluation. It explain the 10 Cs with analogies from a less emotionally loaded area, that of teaching methodologies. It deals with the value and limit of single case description and hints to the ethical problems of doing or not doing a controlled trial, using Semmelweis and Pap test examples.

Depression and the existential domain in the assessment of quality of life in HIV outpatients with the McGill questionnaire.

AIM: The aim of the present study was to further test criterion validity and factorial validity of the McGIll Quality Of Life (MQOL) questionnaire, and to assess its reliability and sensitivity to clinical change in outpatients with HIV infection. METHODS: The authors present a longitudinal study on a consecutive sample of 216 adults treated with HAART at the outpatient facility of an hospital-based tertiary care center in Italy. Patients completed the MQOL and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) both at baseline and follow-up assessments. Patients were classified into subgroups (improved, unchanged, worsened) based on change in BDI scores or CD4 count over time. RESULTS: The pattern of correlation between MQOL subscales and the BDI was as hypothesised. A fairly simple factor structure emerged, with a striking resemblance between the factors and the MQOL subscales. The internal consistency of the MQOL and its subscales was high. The test-retest reliability in clinically unchanged patients was satisfactory. Sensitivity to change, as measured by Guyatt responsiveness statistic, was also satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributed to building evidence of reliability and validity for the MQOL questionnaire, which may be particularly useful to assess the so-called "existential" aspects of QOL that are particularly relevant for patients infected with HIV.

Changes in depression, anxiety, anger, and personality after resective surgery for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy: a 2-year follow-up study.

OBJECTIVE: To further elucidate the psychiatric outcome of surgical treatment for temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). METHODS: Fifty-two consecutive patients with drug-resistant TLE and IQ > or = 70 completed the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Spielberger State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory before epilepsy surgery, after 1 year, and after 2 years. Some patients also completed the 31-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy (N=29) and WHOQOL-100 (N=24) questionnaires. During the follow-up period, patients were maintained on a stable medication regimen. Multivariate repeated measures analysis of variance was used to examine changes in psychiatric variables over time. RESULTS: Seizure outcome was excellent (89% in Engel class I after 2 years). There were only a few significant changes over time in the MMPI profile, suggesting a decrease in interpersonal sensitivity, irritability, and social introversion. Anxiety decreased significantly with a gradual decline, anger dropped significantly after remaining basically flat during the first year, while depression showed a gradual but non-significant decline. Younger age and shorter duration of epilepsy were associated with greater improvement in several anger dimensions. In the patient subgroup with quality of life data available, greater improvement in overall quality of life and key life domains (income, work capacity, personal relationships) was found to be associated with greater decrease in depression, anxiety, and anger. CONCLUSION: The relatively slow decrease of emotional distress over time and its correlation with changes in some key life domains suggest that patients may experience difficulties in switching from a 'sick' role to a 'normal' role, and may easily be disappointed if expectations of positive life changes are not rapidly met. Some counselling sessions early after surgery may be useful to address these issues. The findings also suggest that surgery may yield greater emotional benefits if performed early.

Development, reliability and validity of a self-administered questionnaire on subjective opinion about delusions and voices.

OBJECTIVE: This study focuses on the psychometric characteristics of a self-report instrument, the Delusion and Voices Self-Assessment (DV-SA) questionnaire, to assess delusions and auditory hallucinations from the clients' perspective. METHODS: The DV-SA was administered to 70 schizophrenic patients in treatment in an outpatient mental health clinic in Naples, Italy. It was administered twice to determine the test-retest reliability. A clinician who was blind to the patients' DV-SA ratings also rated the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Sensitivity to change was assessed in 30 patients who completed a 24-week course of cognitive-behavioural therapy sessions. RESULTS: The DV-SA showed good internal consistency and structure, and an acceptable average of item-total correlation. The test-retest reliability was very satisfactory. The comparison between DV-SA and BPRS showed a good association for illness severity. CONCLUSIONS: The DV-SA may be a reliable, valid and sensitive instrument for assessing subjective experiences on delusions and auditory hallucinations. The brevity and limited need for assistance make it an efficient instrument to assess patients' evolution during therapy.

Access to and quality of health and social care for rare diseases: patients' and caregivers' experiences.

People suffering from rare diseases, independently of the condition, often experience the same problems in receiving adequate health and social care. It is not clear how these problems differ in severity among different diseases and in different countries and how they change in time. In the framework of the NEPHIRD (Network of Public Health Institutions on Rare Diseases), a European project, funded by DG-SANCO (EU Commission), an effort was made to develop a simple but comprehensive tool to show patients' and/or caregivers' opinions about the quality and accessibility of health and social services. The self-filled questionnaire asks how often patients or caregivers had both negative and positive experiences about the quality and accessibility of health and social services and their opinion on their improvement, on 5-level scales. A pilot survey was carried out in several European Countries among members of Myasthenia Gravis, Neurofibromatosis, Prader Willi and Rett Syndrome volunteers' associations. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed using Stata and Epi Info 2000. In total, 302 questionnaires were completed in France, Italy, Romania, Spain, Turkey and United Kingdom during 2004-05. In general, respondents thought that health care accessibility was worse than quality, and that social care and legal provisions were worse than health care, with some differences among countries. For all diseases, and for both patients and caregivers, the most frequent reported positive experiences were health professionals' kindness and readiness to help (all medians ranged from 3 to 5). As for the efforts for improvement made by public services in the last three years, the opinions were generally favourable. This study has several limitations. However the assessment tool that has been developed has some innovative and interesting features and may be considered a useful attempt to compare patients' and caregivers' experiences for a range of different diseases, countries and services, with respect to a rare disease programme.

Discriminant ability and criterion validity of the HoNOS in Italian psychiatric residential facilities.

BACKGROUND: The Health of the Nation Outcomes Scales (HoNOS) was developed as an inclusive and comprehensive instrument to assess patient outcomes in 4 main domains: behaviour, cognitive and physical impairment, symptoms and social functioning/context. Concerns about the reliability and validity of the HoNOS have been raised. The aim of this study was to further investigate the discriminatory ability of the HoNOS; criterion validity was also examined. SAMPLING AND METHODS: A broad sample of patients with psychotic disorders, admitted to 265 Italian residential facilities, were rated by trained research assistants and local staff on the HoNOS, Global Assessment of Functioning, Life Skills Profile, and Physical Health Index. Discriminant function analysis was used to examine the ability of the HoNOS items to correctly classify patients with positive symptoms, substantial psychosocial impairment or physical disability. The HoNOS criterion validity was also examined. RESULTS: On the whole, the pattern of correlations between the HoNOS and the other corresponding measures was consistent. However, the majority of the correlations were only moderate. In discriminant function analysis, the classification procedure correctly classified 55.7% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although the HoNOS has many advantages in its brevity, it may lack sufficient discriminatory ability for certain patient groups. Further, it correlates only moderately with measures of disability and physical health status. These findings suggest that the HoNOS alone might be insufficient for routine evaluation and should probably be supplemented by additional measures.

[Accessibility and quality to health social services in Italy for the patients with rare diseases: the opinion of associations]. / Accessibilità e qualita dei servizi socio-sanitari italiani per i pazienti con malattie rare: il parere delle associazioni.

This paper concerns the first phase of a study about the perception of social and health needs of people with rare diseases. The study was performed by the National Center for Rare Diseases at the Italian National Institute of Health (Istituto Superiore di Sanità - ISS). The project wants to be an example of collaboration between the research and the association worlds. Responsible of Associations of Patients and their relatives were asked their opinion about the accessibility and quality of important features of health and social services (accessibility and quality of diagnostic, pharmacological, psychological and rehabilitative interventions, social support, school and vocational training, information that was given to relatives). An ad hoc questionnaire was developed through focus groups. The questionnaire was completed by 108 associations (26,5% of the associations thar are recorded in the ISS database). Average scores showed satisfaction only for some variables and a negative gradient north-south was observed. The most frequent complaints were about information, quality of school and job training services and availability of psychological support. The study showed an high level of dissatisfaction with availability, quality and integration health and social services.

Relevance of anger and irritability in outpatients with major depressive disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Current psychiatric classification systems underestimate the part played by anger and aggressiveness in unipolar depression. This study was designed to assess the relevance of anger, irritability, aggressiveness, hostility, and psychomotor activation in major depressive disorder. METHODS: A total of 222 newly admitted consecutive outpatients with major depressive disorder (mean age 48.9 years, 64.4% females) were enrolled in the study. They had no comorbid axis I or II DSM-IV disorder, and they received no treatment with antidepressants in the preceding 2 months. They were assessed with the SVARAD, a validated scale for the rapid assessment of the main psychopathological dimensions. Principal component analysis was performed on SVARAD items. RESULTS: We obtained a three-factor solution accounting for 47.4% of total variance. The factors were interpreted as 'anger/irritability', 'depression', and 'anxiety', respectively. The anger/irritability dimension was clinically relevant in 23% of patients. Anger/aggressiveness was especially frequent (21.6%), whereas psychomotor activation was infrequent (0.9%). DISCUSSION: In depressive disorders, there are psychopathological dimensions other than depressed mood and anxiety that deserve greater clinical recognition and research. Our study suggests that one of these symptom clusters includes anger, irritability, aggressiveness, and hostility. The relevance of this dimension was not related to concurrent pharmacological treatment. Misdiagnosis of bipolar II disorder is also unlikely to explain our findings. Possibly, personality factors might at least partly explain the occurrence of anger and aggressiveness in several depressed patients. Attachment theory suggests that anger might also be conceived as part of the protest-despair-detachment reaction to a loss, either actual or symbolic.

12-Month comorbidity patterns and associated factors in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project.

OBJECTIVE: Comorbidity patterns of 12-month mood, anxiety and alcohol disorders and socio-demographic factors associated with comorbidity were studied among the general population of six European countries. METHOD: Data were derived from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD), a cross-sectional psychiatric epidemiological study in a representative sample of adults aged 18 years or older in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain. The diagnostic instrument used was the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI). Data are based on 21 425 completed interviews. RESULTS: In general, high associations were found within the separate anxiety disorders and between mood and anxiety disorders. Lowest comorbidity associations were found for specific phobia and alcohol abuse-the disorders with the least functional disabilities. Comorbidity patterns were consistent cross-nationally. Associated factors for comorbidity of mood and anxiety disorders were female gender, younger age, lower educational level, higher degree of urbanicity, not living with a partner and unemployment. Only younger people were at greater risk for comorbidity of alcohol disorder with mood, anxiety disorders or both. CONCLUSION: High levels of comorbidity are found in the general population. Comorbidity is more common in specific groups. To reduce psychiatric burden, early intervention in populations with a primary disorder is important to prevent comorbidity.

Sampling and methods of the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project.

OBJECTIVE: The European Study of Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project was designed to evaluate the prevalence, the impact and the treatment patterns in Europe. This paper presents an overview of the methods implemented in the project. METHOD: ESEMeD is a cross-sectional study in a representative sample of 21 425 adults, 18 or older, from the general population of Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI) was administered by home interviews from January 2001 to August 2003 using Computer Assisted Personal Interview (CAPI) technology. Data quality was controlled to ensure reliability and validity of the information obtained. RESULTS: Response rate varied from 78.6% in Spain to 45.9% in France. Less than 4% of the individuals had errors in the checking procedures performed. CONCLUSION: The sampling methodologies, comprehensive psychiatric instruments and quality control procedures used have rendered the ESEMeD database a unique and important source of information about the prevalence, the disability burden and unmet medical needs of mental disorders within Europe.

Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the 12-month and lifetime prevalence rates of mood, anxiety and alcohol disorders in six European countries. METHOD: A representative random sample of non-institutionalized inhabitants from Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain aged 18 or older (n = 21425) were interviewed between January 2001 and August 2003. DSM-IV disorders were assessed by lay interviewers using a revised version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI). RESULTS: Fourteen per cent reported a lifetime history of any mood disorder, 13.6% any anxiety disorder and 5.2% a lifetime history of any alcohol disorder. More than 6% reported any anxiety disorder, 4.2% any mood disorder, and 1.0% any alcohol disorder in the last year. Major depression and specific phobia were the most common single mental disorders. Women were twice as likely to suffer 12-month mood and anxiety disorders as men, while men were more likely to suffer alcohol abuse disorders. CONCLUSION: ESEMeD is the first study to highlight the magnitude of mental disorders in the six European countries studied. Mental disorders were frequent, more common in female, unemployed, disabled persons, or persons who were never married or previously married. Younger persons were also more likely to have mental disorders, indicating an early age of onset for mood, anxiety and alcohol disorders.

Disability and quality of life impact of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project.

OBJECTIVE: This manuscript examines the impact of mental health state and specific mental and physical disorders on work role disability and quality of life in six European countries. METHOD: The ESEMeD study was conducted in: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain. Individuals aged 18 years and over who were not institutionalized were eligible for an in-home computer-assisted interview. Common mental disorders, work loss days (WLD) in the past month and quality of life (QoL) were assessed, using the WMH-2000 version of the CIDI, the WHODAS-II, and the mental and physical component scores (MCS, PCS) of the 12-item short form, respectively. The presence of five chronic physical disorders: arthritis, heart disease, lung disease, diabetes and neurological disease was also assessed. Multivariate regression techniques were used to identify the independent association of mental and physical disorders while controlling for gender, age and country. RESULTS: In each country, WLD and loss of QoL increased with the number of disorders. Most mental disorders had approximately 1.0 SD-unit lower mean MCS and lost three to four times more work days, compared with people without any 12-month mental disorder. The 10 disorders with the highest independent impact on WLD were: neurological disease, panic disorder, PTSD, major depressive episode, dysthymia, specific phobia, social phobia, arthritis, agoraphobia and heart disease. The impact of mental vs. physical disorders on QoL was specific, with mental disorders impacting more on MCS and physical disorders more on PCS. Compared to physical disorders, mental disorders had generally stronger 'cross-domain' effects. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that mental disorders are important determinants of work role disability and quality of life, often outnumbering the impact of common chronic physical disorders.

Use of mental health services in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project.

OBJECTIVE: Comprehensive information about access and patterns of use of mental health services in Europe is lacking. We present the first results of the use of health services for mental disorders in six European countries as part of the ESEMeD project. METHOD: The study was conducted in: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain. Individuals aged 18 years and over who were not institutionalized were eligible for an computer-assisted interview done at home. The 21 425 participants were asked to report how frequently they consulted formal health services due to their emotions or mental health, the type of professional they consulted and the treatment they received as a result of their consultation in the previous year. RESULTS: An average of 6.4% of the total sample had consulted formal health services in the previous 12 months. Of the participants with a 12-month mental disorder, 25.7% had consulted a formal health service during that period. This proportion was higher for individuals with a mood disorder (36.5%, 95% CI 32.5-40.5) than for those with anxiety disorders (26.1%, 95% CI 23.1-29.1). Among individuals with a 12-month mental disorder who had contacted the health services 12 months previously, approximately two-thirds had contacted a mental health professional. Among those with a 12-month mental disorder consulting formal health services, 21.2% received no treatment. CONCLUSION: The ESEMeD results suggest that the use of health services is limited among individuals with mental disorders in the European countries studied. The factors associated with this limited access and their implications deserve further research.

Psychotropic drug utilization in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project.

OBJECTIVE: To assess psychotropic drug utilization in the general population of six European countries, and the pattern of use in individuals with different DSM-IV diagnoses of 12-month mental disorders. METHOD: Data were derived from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD/MHEDEA 2000), a cross-sectional psychiatric epidemiological study in a representative sample of 21 425 adults aged 18 or older from six European countries (e.g. Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain). Individuals were asked about any psychotropic drug use in the past 12 months, even if they used the drug(s) just once. A colour booklet containing high-quality pictures of psychotropic drugs commonly used to treat mental disorders was provided to help respondents recall drug use. RESULTS: Psychotropic drug utilization is generally low in individuals with any 12-month mental disorder (32.6%). The extent of psychotropic drug utilization varied according to the specific DSM-IV diagnosis. Among individuals with a 12-month diagnosis of pure major depression, only 21.2% had received any antidepressants within the same period; the exclusive use of antidepressants was even lower (4.6%), while more individuals took only anxiolytics (18.4%). CONCLUSION: These data question the appropriateness of current pharmacological treatments, particularly for major depression, in which under-treatment is coupled with the high use of non-specific medications, such as anxiolytics.

[Assessment of working conditions in health care workers]. / La valutazione della condizione lavorativa in popolazioni del settore sanitario.

OBJECTIVE: Validation and first use of a self-completed questionnaire to assess opinion on working conditions in health professionals. METHODS: The questionnaire consisted of 40 items. It was developed via review of the literature and two focus groups. A reliability test-retest study was performed on 45 health professionals with different roles. Factorial validity and internal consistency of each derived subscale were evaluated on a wide sample of 514 professionals. In addition, the opinion of the health care professionals was evaluated and possible relationships were tested between total and subscale scores and the following variables: age, sex, professional role and years in the job. RESULTS: Weighted kappa was higher than 0.60 for 95% of the items, higher than 0.70 for 43% and higher than 0.80 for 20%. Factor analysis revealed that six factors--work content and organisation, physical fatigue, relationships, mental stress, hours of work, and physical environment--explained 57% of total variance. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the subscales ranged from 0.70 to 0.91. Low levels of satisfaction in dfferent job aspects were found among general hospital staff. They were particularly dissatisfied with personal growth and development, fairness in incentives, dissemination of information, environment, support of new ideas and skills, career opportunities. In particular, satisfaction differed among the various professional roles. DISCUSSION: The questionnaire was found reliable and had a coherent factor structure, with six factors or subscales that showed good internal consistency. This questionnaire may be useful to assess satisfaction with work in health care staff. The preliminary results of its use suggest that satisfaction with different aspects of work is low.

Residential care in Italy. National survey of non-hospital facilities.

BACKGROUND: In Italy, where all mental hospitals have been gradually phased out since 1978, psychiatric patients requiring long-term care are being treated in non-hospital residential facilities (NHRFs). However, detailed data on these facilities are sparse. AIMS: The Progetto Residenze (PROGRES) residential care project is a three-phase study, the first phase of which aims to survey the main characteristics of all Italian NHRFs. METHOD: Structured interviews were conducted with the manager of each NHRF. RESULTS: On 31 May 2000 there were 1370 NHRFs with 17 138 beds; an average of 12.5 beds each and a rate of 2.98 beds per 10 000 inhabitants. Residential provision varied ten-fold between regions and discharge rates were very low. Most had 24-hour staffing with 1.42 patients per full-time worker. CONCLUSIONS: There is marked variability in the provision of residential places between different regions; discharge rates are generally low.

Papnet-assisted cytological diagnosis intensifies the already marked variability among cytological laboratories.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to assess the sensitivity, specificity and reliability of PAPNET-assisted diagnosis in comparison with conventional screening. SETTING: Seven Italian and one English University or Research Institutes, and a random sample of an other 20 Italian Laboratories of the Italian National Health Service (INHS) provided the cervical smears. METHODS: During the training phase every center examined in rotation four sets of slides for a total of 300 representative slides. Afterwards, 900 "positive" slides were added to the 3,100 slides which were collected consecutively without any selection or exclusion. The eight main centers were divided into four couples and each couple of centers examined 775 slides with the PAPNET system, "blindly" to the original diagnosis. An expert cytopathologist (M.A.) of the National Institute of Health (NIH) reassessed 40% of the slides with an original negative diagnosis to evaluate the false negative rate. Two expert NIH cytopathologists (M.A., G.M.) re-examined all slides where a disagreement had been observed between the original and one or both of the study diagnoses. The main analyses concerned the following three main categories: WNL and unsatisfactory for evaluation; ASCUS, AGUS and LSIL; HSIL and carcinoma. A special algorithm was devised to define the reference diagnosis for sensitivity and specificity assessment. RESULTS: Laboratories, even belonging to the same couple, classified as "no review" a very different proportion of slides ranging from 35% to 74%. The index of kappa agreement between the members of couples examining the same sets of slides was low or very low, ranging from 0.30 to 0.03. The sensitivity of the review classification was particularly low in some laboratories. Surprisingly, only a small correlation was observed between the sensitivity of the review classification and the proportion of slides classified as "review". The "tentative" diagnosis on PAPNET tiles of the "review" slides was almost as reliable as the microscopic diagnosis. In the overall performance, there were many significant differences among the eight laboratories. The best laboratory had a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 96%. At least three laboratories displayed unacceptably low sensitivity and one a very low specificity. CONCLUSION: Altogether these results seem to confirm that there are wide differences among cytological laboratories per se, and that these differences are intensified by the use of an instrument like PAPNET. The huge variation in performance may be explained by differences in basic skills and by different training, but it is difficult to understand exactly what could have been done to reduce it.

Association between the engagement of relatives in a behavioural group intervention for smoking cessation and higher quit rates at 6-, 12- and 24-month follow-ups.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a behavioural group intervention for smoking cessation, which included as its most original feature the recommendation to participate with a relative or close friend. METHODS: A total of 1,060 subjects entered the programme, which consisted of 9 group sessions over a period of 5 weeks. The intervention consisted of a modified version of the Five-Day Plan, the main differences being the use of behavioural therapy techniques and small group work, and the addition of 4 weekly booster sessions. About two thirds of the participants came with a relative or close friend. Long-term abstinence from smoking was assessed with follow-up telephone interviews. RESULTS: Very few subjects were lost to follow-ups (9.2% at 6 months, 9.7% at 1 year, 10.8% at 2 years). The observed quit rates were 42.6% at 6 months, 35.5% at 1 year and 32% at 2 years. When considering as smokers all subjects who were lost to follow-ups, quit rates were also satisfactory (38.7% at 6 months, 32.1% at 1 year and 28.6% at 2 years). The main predictors of a good outcome were being male, smoking less than 20 cigarettes per day, having started smoking after 18 years of age, having made previous quitting attempts, not having a history of unsuccessful participation to smoking cessation interventions and attending the sessions with a relative or close friend. DISCUSSION: Although some limitations inherent in the design of our study suggest caution in interpreting the results and in making comparisons, the long-term effectiveness of the intervention was satisfactory. The inclusion of a relative or close friend appeared useful. This simple and inexpensive strategy may deserve recommendation, though in the future it should be tested in controlled trials.

Psychiatric disorders in Sardinian immigrants to Paris: a comparison with Parisians and Sardinians resident in Sardinia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare the prevalence of ICD-10 psychiatric disorders in a community sample of subjects of Sardinian origin resident in Paris (here "immigrants"), of the general Parisian population ("Parisians") and of Sardinians resident in Sardinia ("Sardinians"). METHODS: The sample of immigrants was obtained by contacting a fifth of all households with a Sardinian surname in Paris telephone directories. The other samples have already been partially described in previous studies. All subjects were interviewed using the CIDIS, a shortened version of the structured WHO interview CIDI. RESULTS: High or very high response rates were achieved in all studies. The final sample sizes were: 153 immigrants, 2,260 Parisians and 1,040 Sardinians. Immigrants showed high rates of depressive disorders, as did Parisians, and high rates of anxiety disorders, as did Sardinians. The immigrants' offspring (second-generation immigrants) seemed to be particularly at risk for depression, drug-abuse and bulimia. Elderly Sardinians who had returned to Sardinia after a long period of emigration showed an increased risk of dysthymia. The presence of a confidential relationship had a protective effect. CONCLUSIONS: The results are consistent with previous findings which suggest a greater risk of anxiety disorders in Southern Europe and of depression in Northern European countries. Immigrants in this study seem to present a particularly unfavourable pattern of mental disorders compared to both origin and host populations. The role of social support, use of mental health services and social conditions of second-generation immigrants should be analysed in greater depth.