The Effect of Palatoplasty on Growth.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of palatoplasty on growth velocity in undernourished and nourished orally fed children with cleft palate. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted using a data query with cleft-associated ICD-10 and ICD-9 codes to identify children who underwent cleft palate repair between 2006 and 2022 at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Data gathered included demographics, admission variables, weight gain, and weight percentile as per the WHO growth chart data. Inclusion was limited to patients with complete growth data and without parenteral feeding support. Nutritional status was defined as undernourished (≤3rd percentile) and nourished (>3rd percentile). Between and within-group comparisons were made using nonparametric tests. RESULTS: A total of 192 patients met the study criteria. Among undernourished patients, the median pre- and postsurgical weekly weight gain was 0.09 kg and 0.05 kg (p = <0.0001), and the median growth percentiles were 0.67% and 1.1%, respectively (p = 0.03). Among nourished patients, the median pre- and postsurgical weekly weight gain was 0.12 kg and 0.07 kg (p = <0.0001), and the median growth percentiles were 25.4% and 29.5%, respectively (p = <0.0001). The postsurgical reduction in weight gain per week was similar across nutritional status (p = 0.43), however, the nourished group demonstrated a larger increase in median growth percentile (3.3% vs. 0.23%; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that palatoplasty does not independently improve growth velocity in children who were able to maintain an oral preoperative diet. In the case of undernourished children, there was no clinically significant improvement in postoperative growth percentiles. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Timing of First Set of Pressure Equalization Tubes in Pediatric Patients With Cleft Deformities.

OBJECTIVES: Children with cleft palates often have comorbid eustachian tube dysfunction requiring pressure equalization tubes (PETs). PETs can relieve middle ear effusions that impede hearing. Ideal PET placement timing in this population is controversial. In this study, the audiologic exam passing rates of patients with cleft palate prior to and following PET insertion were assessed. Rates for patients receiving PETs at different ages were compared. It was hypothesized that earlier PET placement may benefit patients with additional months of improved hearing. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients with cleft palate between November 22, 2016 and November 22, 2021 at a tertiary center. Statistical analysis compared passing/normal audiologic exams in patients receiving PETs at different ages. RESULTS: A total of 348 patients had cleft palate diagnoses, received PETs, and had adequate hearing data for inclusion. Those with PETs inserted at 3 months of age or less had an increase in percent of patients passing audiologic exams following versus prior to PET insertion of 13% (1.3 times improvement). Those receiving PETs between 7- and 12-months had the largest rate of improvement (42%) (2.4 times improvement); other groups had changes in passing rates between 31% and 40%. The rate of passing audiologic exams following PET insertion was high across all groups, ranging from 66% to 81%. CONCLUSION: This is one of the first studies exploring the timing of PET placement in this population and showed that patients receiving PETs at 3 months of age or younger passed subsequent audiologic exams at similar rates relative to those receiving PETs later in life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3391-3394, 2024.

Percutaneous Enteral Feeding in Patients With 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence of percutaneous enteral feeding in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2 DS) and determine factors associated with the need for percutaneous enteral feeding tube placement. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: The records of a 22q11.2 DS clinic and pediatric otolaryngology clinic at a tertiary pediatric hospital were reviewed from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2019. All patients with confirmed 22q11.2 deletion were identified. Cardiac, otolaryngological, and feeding characteristics were recorded along with surgical history. A patient was defined to have a G-tube if the history was significant for any percutaneous gastric feeding tube placement, including a gastrostomy tube, gastrostomyjejunostomy tube, or a Mickey button. RESULTS: One hundred ninety patients with confirmed 22q11.2 DS by genetic testing were included. Thirty-three percent (n = 63) required G-tube placement. G-tube placement was associated with cardiac diagnosis (P < .01), history of cardiac surgery (P < .01), aspiration (P < .01), nasopharyngeal reflux (P < .01), subglottic stenosis (P < .01), laryngeal web (P = .003), and tracheostomy (P < .01). This suggests these conditions are associated with higher rates of G-tube placement in the 22q11.2 DS population. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with 22q11.2 DS often require supplemental nutritional support in the form of G-tube feeding, most often in the first year of life. Congenital heart abnormalities and surgery along with tracheostomy, subglottic stenosis, laryngeal web, aspiration, and nasopharyngeal reflux are significantly associated with the need for G-tube placement. Understanding associations between comorbid conditions and G-tube placement, especially those involving the head and neck, may assist with counseling of patients with 22q11.2 DS.

Submucous Cleft Palate Repair in Patients With 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether surgical intervention for submucous cleft palate (SMCP) is more common in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q DS) compared to children without 22q DS. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary pediatric hospital and 22q11.2 DS specialty clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-two children seen at the tertiary hospital or clinic during a 20-year period (June 1999-June 2019) with documented SMCP with and without 22q DS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Percentage of children with SMCP with and without 22q DS requiring surgical intervention for velopharyngeal insufficiency. RESULTS: Patients with 22q DS had a significantly higher frequency of SMCP repair than those without 22q DS (89.7% vs 32.0%, P < .001, χ2 = 37.75). The odds of requiring SMCP repair were 18.6 times higher in those with 22q DS compared to those without (odds ratio = 18.6, CI = 6.1-56.6). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new evidence suggesting patients with 22q DS require SMCP surgical repair for velopharyngeal insufficiency at a significantly higher rate than those without 22q DS. As the majority of patients with 22q DS with SMCP require surgical intervention, future prospective studies looking at early versus late repair of SMCP in patients with 22q DS are needed to guide the surgical repair timeline in this population.

Associated syndromes in patients with Pierre Robin Sequence.

OBJECTIVES: Classically, Pierre Robin Sequence (PRS) is a triad of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and airway obstruction, although frequently associated with cleft palate. Current literature reports that Stickler syndrome is the most common syndrome associated with PRS, and 22q11 deletion syndrome (22q11 DS) as the second most common. This study identifies associations between PRS and genetic syndromes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients diagnosed with PRS over a 10-year period from 4/1/2007 to 4/1/2017 at a tertiary children's hospital. RESULTS: 4,052 consecutive charts were reviewed and 234 patients had a diagnosis of PRS confirmed with the triad of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and airway obstruction. Of note, all of these patients had cleft palate. Of the 234 patients with PRS, 65 patients had syndromic diagnoses (28%). One patient had 22q11 DS (0.43%), and 31 patients had Stickler syndrome (13.2%). Additionally, 3 patients had central hypoventilation syndrome, 3 patients had Duane syndrome, 2 patients had Cornelia de Lange syndrome, 2 patients had Emanuel syndrome, 2 patients had Gordon syndrome, 2 patients had Mobius syndrome, 2 patients had Nager syndrome. Multiple other syndromes were identified, but occurred in isolated cases. CONCLUSION: This study supports literature that PRS is most commonly associated with Stickler Syndrome but rarely associated with 22q11 DS given that only 1 patient had both PRS and 22q11 DS.

Surgical Outcomes for the Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome.

This study aimed to compare outcomes of concomitant palatoplasty and sphincter pharyngoplasty with pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty alone for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Thirty-one cases were identified for inclusion in the study. Patients were separated into 3 surgical groups: combined palatoplasty and sphincter pharyngoplasty (n = 11), pharyngeal flap (n = 7), and sphincter pharyngoplasty (n = 13). Outcome measures included perceptual speech analyses, surgical complications, and revision rates. There were no differences in preoperative speech analysis scores (P = .31). The combined palatoplasty and sphincter pharyngoplasty procedure had similar speech outcomes compared to pharyngeal flap, and both were significantly better than sphincter pharyngoplasty alone. Complication rates (P = .61) and the need for revision surgery (P = .25) were similar among all 3 groups. Concomitant palatoplasty and sphincter pharyngoplasty may be an alternative treatment for velopharyngeal insufficiency in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Congenital and iatrogenic laryngeal and vocal abnormalities in patients with 22q11.2 deletion.

BACKGROUND: Voice abnormalities often go unrecognized in patients with 22q11.2 deletion because speech abnormalities become the focus of evaluation. OBJECTIVE: To analyze voice and vocal fold abnormalities in patients with 22q11.2 deletion by examining voice, not speech. METHODS: This is a case series with chart review from 2009 to 2016. Records of both a velocardiofacial syndrome (VCF) clinic and pediatric otolaryngology clinic at a tertiary pediatric hospital were reviewed. All patients with confirmed 22q11.2 deletion were identified. Cardiac, otolaryngological, speech, and voice characteristics were recorded along with surgical history. Main outcomes included voice characteristics based on speech therapy assessment, along with vocal fold or laryngeal abnormalities. Co-morbidities and surgical history were also recorded. RESULTS: 109 patients were identified with 22q11.2 deletion by genetic testing. Eighteen percent (n = 20) displayed a vocal fold or laryngeal abnormality, either congenital or iatrogenic. The most common congenital abnormalities were laryngeal web (n = 10) and subglottic stenosis (n = 7). The most common iatrogenic abnormality was paralyzed left vocal fold (n = 4). Perceptual analysis by speech therapy showed 65% (n = 71) with a voice within normal limits while 17% (n = 19) were not within normal limits. Of the 20 patients with a vocal fold abnormality, 15% (n = 3) presented a voice within normal limits, while 65% (n = 13) were not within normal limits. Of the 19 patients with a voice outside normal limits, 68% (n = 13) had a diagnosed vocal fold abnormality. Sixteen percent (n = 3) of these patients had an abnormal voice as a result of other issues. CONCLUSION: Out of 109 patients with 22q11.2 deletion, 18% displayed a laryngeal abnormality and 17% had abnormal vocal quality. This suggests that voice and vocal fold abnormalities are important to consider in this population. Distinguishing between speech and voice abnormalities in patients with 22q11.2 deletion can help ensure appropriate intervention.