Rehabilitation of Executive Function in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury (REPeaT): Outcomes of a pilot randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of Cogmed Working Memory Training (Cogmed) in improving working memory (WM) and decision making (DM) in childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI), and any associated increases in functional outcomes such as academic achievement in mathematics, behavior, social skills, and quality of life. METHOD: A randomized controlled trial of the Cogmed (RM version) intervention for children with TBI. A total of 69 children post-TBI were screened for WM impairments, of which 31 eligible participants (Mage: 10.6 years; male n = 21) were recruited and randomized to either the treatment group (Cogmed, n = 16) or the active-control group (Lexia Reading Core5, n = 15). Both groups completed computerized training for 5 weeks with clinician support via an online video platform. Immediately posttraining and at 6 months follow-up, primary (WM and DM) and secondary functional outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Immediately postintervention, significant improvement was found in one primary outcome (WM verbal component) for the Cogmed group, but this was not maintained at the 6 months follow-up. No immediate improvements or maintenance gains (small effect sizes) in other primary outcomes of visuospatial WM or DM were reported in the Cogmed group. No other significant group differences were detected for other functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limited benefits observed in this small randomized controlled trial, it will be beneficial to investigate Cogmed's efficacy in a case-series methodology, to further determine its effectiveness in a pediatric TBI population. Furthermore, a cautious approach in clinical implementation of Cogmed is advised. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Biopsychosocial correlates of fatigue in young adult survivors of childhood traumatic brain injury: A prospective cohort study.

This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the potential role of injury, socio-demographic and individual psychological factors in predicting long-term fatigue outcomes in young adult survivors of childhood TBI at 16-years post-injury. The study included 51 young adults diagnosed with childhood TBI from 2-12 years of age. Twenty age-and-sex-matched controls were included for comparison. Findings showed that almost one-in-four TBI participants (24%) endorsed clinically elevated fatigue at 16-years post-injury. Despite the relatively large proportion of TBI participants endorsing clinically significant fatigue, group comparisons revealed that the TBI and control groups did not significantly differ on fatigue symptom severity or rates of clinically elevated fatigue. For the TBI group, post-injury fatigue was significantly associated with socio-demographic and psychological factors, including lower educational level, higher depression symptom severity, and more frequent substance use. Higher fatigue was also associated with lower self-reported quality of life (QoL) in the physical, psychological, and environmental domains, even after controlling for depressive symptom severity, socio-demographic, and injury-related factors. Overall, findings show that a substantial proportion of young adults with a history of childhood TBI experience clinically elevated fatigue at 16-years post-injury. Identification and treatment of modifiable risk-factors (e.g. depression symptoms, substance use) has potential to reduce fatigue.

The Australian and New Zealand brain injury lifespan cohort protocol: Leveraging common data elements to characterise longitudinal outcome and recovery.

INTRODUCTION: Cognitive, behavioural, academic, mental health and social impairments are common following paediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, studies are often reliant on small samples of children drawn from narrow age bands, and employ highly variable methodologies, which make it challenging to generalise existing research findings and understand the lifetime history of TBI. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: This study will synthesise common data sets from national (Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland) and international (New Zealand) collaborators, such that common data elements from multiple cohorts recruited from these four sites will be extracted and harmonised. Participant-level harmonised data will then be pooled to create a single integrated data set of participants including common cognitive, social, academic and mental health outcome variables. The large sample size (n=1816), consisting of participants with mild, moderate and severe TBI, will provide statistical power to answer important questions that cannot be addressed by small, individual cohorts. Complex statistical modelling, such as generalised estimation equation, multilevel and latent growth models, will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) of the Royal Children's Hospital (RCH), Melbourne (HREC Reference Number 2019.168). The approved study protocol will be used for all study-related procedures. Findings will be translated into clinical practice, inform policy decisions, guide the appropriate allocation of limited healthcare resources and support the implementation of individualised care.

Community-based interventions for adolescents following traumatic brain injury: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Chronic impairment following childhood traumatic brain injury has the potential to increase risk of negative outcomes. This highlights potential value in community-based rehabilitation programs. OBJECTIVES: To identify research studies examining existing intervention programmes available in community-based rehabilitation to adolescents following TBI to assist with the transition back into the community. METHODS: A systematic review of community-based interventions was conducted across different national contexts. All included studies involved a clinical population with TBI, aged 11 to 25 years inclusive. Risk of bias was rated for each included study. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were identified for inclusion in the review, of these eleven distinct interventions were found. The quality of evidence was largely weak and highly variable. CONCLUSION: The results suggest some improvement in adolescent outcomes following community-based interventions, however higher quality evidence is needed to support specific interventions.