Minimizing Lung Injury During Laparoscopy in Head-Down Tilt: A Physiological Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Increased intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopy induces atelectasis. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can alleviate atelectasis but may cause hyperinflation. Cyclic opening of collapsed alveoli and hyperinflation can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury and postoperative pulmonary complications. We aimed to study the effect of PEEP on atelectasis, lung stress, and hyperinflation during laparoscopy in the head-down (Trendelenburg) position. METHODS: An open-label, repeated-measures, interventional, physiological cohort trial was designed. All participants were recruited from a single tertiary Belgian university hospital. Twenty-three nonobese patients scheduled for laparoscopy in the Trendelenburg position were recruited.We applied a decremental PEEP protocol: 15 (high), 10 and 5 (low) cm H 2 O. Atelectasis was studied with the lung ultrasound score, the end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure, the arterial oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen concentration (P ao2 /Fi o2 ) ratio, and the dynamic respiratory system compliance. Global hyperinflation was evaluated by dead space volume, and regional ventilation was evaluated by lung ultrasound. Lung stress was estimated using the transpulmonary driving pressure and dynamic compliance. Data are reported as medians (25th-75th percentile). RESULTS: At 15, 10, and 5 cm H 2 O PEEP, the respective measurements were: lung ultrasound scores (%) 11 (0-22), 27 (11-39), and 53 (42-61) ( P < .001); end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures (cm H 2 O) 0.9 (-0.6 to 1.7), -0.3 (-2.0 to 0.7), and -1.9 (-4.6 to -0.9) ( P < .001); P ao2 /Fi o2 ratios (mm Hg) 471 (435-538), 458 (410-537), and 431 (358-492) ( P < .001); dynamic respiratory system compliances (mL/cm H 2 O) 32 (26-36), 30 (25-34), and 27 (22-30) ( P < .001); driving pressures (cm H 2 O) 8.2 (7.5-9.5), 9.3 (8.5-11.1), and 11.0 (10.3-12.2) ( P < .001); and alveolar dead space ventilation fractions (%) 10 (9-12), 10 (9-12), and 9 (8-12) ( P = .23). The lung ultrasound score was similar between apical and basal lung regions at each PEEP level ( P = .76, .37, and .76, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Higher PEEP levels during laparoscopy in the head-down position facilitate lung-protective ventilation. Atelectasis and lung stress are reduced in the absence of global alveolar hyperinflation.

Flow-controlled ventilation in moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19: an open-label repeated-measures controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV), a novel mode of mechanical ventilation characterised by constant flow during active expiration, may result in more efficient alveolar gas exchange, better lung recruitment and might be useful in limiting ventilator-induced lung injury. However, data regarding FCV in mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are scarce. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesised that the use of FCV is feasible and would improve oxygenation in moderate COVID-19 ARDS compared to conventional ventilation. DESIGN: Open-label repeated-measures controlled trial. SETTING: From February to April 2021, patients with moderate COVID-19 ARDS were recruited in a tertiary referral intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Patients with moderate ARDS (PaO2/FIO2 ratio 100-200 mmHg, SpO2 88-94% and PaO2 60-80 mmHg) were considered eligible. Exclusion criteria were: extremes of age (< 18 years, > 80 years), obesity (body mass index > 40 kg/m2), prone positioning at the time of intervention, mechanical ventilation for more than 10 days and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Eleven patients were recruited. INTERVENTION: Participants were ventilated in FCV mode for 30 min, and subsequently in volume-control mode (VCV) for 30 min. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility of FCV to maintain oxygenation was assessed by the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (mmHg) as a primary outcome parameter. Secondary outcomes included ventilator parameters, PaCO2 and haemodynamic data. All adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: FCV was feasible in all patients and no adverse events were observed. There was no difference in the PaO2/FIO2 ratio after 30 min of ventilation in FCV mode (169 mmHg) compared to 30 min of ventilation in VCV mode subsequently (168 mmHg, 95% CI of pseudo-medians (- 10.5, 3.6), p = 0.56). The tidal volumes (p < 0.01) and minute ventilation were lower during FCV (p = 0.01) while PaCO2 was similar at the end of the 30-min ventilation periods (p = 0.31). Mean arterial pressure during FCV was comparable to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty minutes of FCV in patients with moderate COVID-19 ARDS receiving neuromuscular blocking agents resulted in similar oxygenation, compared to VCV. FCV was feasible and did not result in adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04894214.

A low dose of three local anesthetic solutions for interscalene blockade tested by thermal quantitative sensory testing: a randomized controlled trial.

This randomized double-blind controlled trial compared the block characteristics of three low-dose local anesthetics at different roots in an ultrasound-guided interscalene block, using thermal quantitative sensory testing for assessing the functioning of cutaneous small nerve fibres. A total of 37 adults scheduled to undergo shoulder arthroscopy were randomized to receive 5 mL of either 0.5% levobupivacaine with and without epinephrine 1/200,000 or 0.75% ropivacaine in a single-shot interscalene block. Thermal quantitative sensory testing was performed in the C4, C5, C6 and C7 dermatomes. Detection thresholds for cold/warm sensation and cold/heat pain were measured before and at 30 min, 6, 10 and 24 h after infiltration around C5. The need for rescue medication was recorded. No significant differences between groups were found for any sensation (lowest P = 0.28). At 6 h, the largest differences in sensory thresholds were observed for the C5 dermatome. The increase in thresholds were less in C4 and C6 and minimal in C7 for all sensations. The analgesic effect lasted the longest in C5 (time × location mixed model P < 0.001 for all sensory tests). The time to rescue analgesia was significantly shorter with 0.75% ropivacaine (P = 0.02). The quantitative sensory findings showed no difference in intensity between the local anesthetics tested. A decrease in block intensity, with minimal changes in pain detection thresholds, was observed in the roots adjacent to C5, with the lowest block intensity in C7. A clinically relevant shorter duration was found with 0.75% ropivacaine compared to the other groups. Trial registration NCT 02691442.