Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 21(4): 471-473, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29101581

RESUMO

A 53-year-old Afghan man presented with a 12-month history of left proptosis, diplopia and facial swelling 20 years after a bomb blast injury. Magnetic resonance and computed tomography imaging revealed a well-circumscribed lesion centred within the left inferior orbit/superior maxillary sinus along with left orbital fracture. Histopathology and immunostaining of the debulked lesion were consistent with traumatic neuroma of the infraorbital nerve. Infraorbital neuromas have developed following orbital decompression surgeries but have not been reported previously following non-surgical trauma.


Assuntos
Traumatismos por Explosões/complicações , Traumatismos dos Nervos Cranianos/complicações , Neoplasias dos Nervos Cranianos/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Neuroma/diagnóstico por imagem , Órbita/inervação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Traumatismos por Explosões/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos dos Nervos Cranianos/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias dos Nervos Cranianos/patologia , Neoplasias dos Nervos Cranianos/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuroma/patologia , Neuroma/cirurgia , Austrália do Sul
2.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 6(8): 820-5, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26992029

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) are often reported to be recalcitrant to standard medical and surgical intervention. Failure rates of standard endoscopic sinus surgery in these patients are reported to be as high as 90%. We review the outcomes for our cohort of AERD patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery and endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP). METHODS: Data was collected prospectively between January 2001 and December 2013. Information including demographics, asthma status, aspirin sensitivity, 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Lund-Mackay scores, and endoscopic ostium assessment were collected for up to 5 years. Minimum follow-up was 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 31 AERD patients underwent complete sphenoethmoidectomy, maxillary antrostomy and EMLP during the study period with an average follow-up of 36 months. Polyp recurrence was seen in a total of 18 patients (58%). Seven patients required revision EMLP following initial surgery demonstrating a failure rate of 22.5%. AERD patients had a statistically significant increased risk of both nasal polyps recurrence and need for revision surgery. Revision EMLP was needed due to recurrence of nasal polyps in 6 cases and frontal ostium stenosis in a single case. Time to revision EMLP was similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: Complete sphenoethmoidectomy, maxillary antrostomy, and EMLP is successful in a significant majority of patients with AERD and CRSwNP. It is well tolerated with a low complication rate and facilitates successful ongoing medical management of the condition in patients with AERD.


Assuntos
Asma Induzida por Aspirina/cirurgia , Endoscopia/métodos , Pólipos Nasais/cirurgia , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rinite/cirurgia , Sinusite/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 6(5): 518-22, 2016 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26879121

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP) is used to treat patients who fail conventional sinus surgery. The failure rate of a primary EMLP is reported to be between 5% and 32%. The failure rate of revision EMLP has not been reported. We present our institutions data regarding the outcome of patients requiring revision EMLP. METHODS: Data was collected prospectively. Patients undergoing primary EMLP between January 2001 and December 2013 with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included. Information related to demographics, asthma status, aspirin sensitivity, 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score, Lund-Mackay scores, intraoperative findings, and endoscopic ostium assessment were collected. RESULTS: There were 213 primary EMLPs completed with average follow-up of 36 months. The failure rate of primary EMLP was 8.9% (19/213), whereas the failure rate of revision EMLP was 21% (4/19). Risk factors for failure of primary EMLP included the presence of intraoperative pus, more than 5 previous sinus operations and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). Revision of EMLP was undertaken primarily due to recurrence of nasal polyps or ostium stenosis. Those patients who underwent revision EMLP experienced symptomatic improvement and no major complications following the procedure. CONCLUSION: The failure rate of revision EMLP is 21% in our series. The majority of revisions were for nasal polyp recurrence. Revision EMLP is a safe and well-tolerated procedure in the small group of patients that require further surgery. Patients with intraoperative pus present at their initial EMLP, more than 5 previous sinus operations, or AERD are at increased risk of failure.


Assuntos
Endoscopia/métodos , Pólipos Nasais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/métodos , Rinite/cirurgia , Sinusite/cirurgia , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...