A clinical pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study between dextromethorphan and emvododstat, a potent anti-SARS-CoV-2 dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitor.

PURPOSE: A therapeutic agent that targets both viral replication and the hyper-reactive immune response would offer a highly desirable treatment for severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19) management. Emvododstat (PTC299; 4-chlorophenyl 6-chloro-1-[4-methoxyphenyl]-1,3, 4,9-tetrahydro-2H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole-2-carboxylate) was found to be a potent inhibitor of immunomodulatory and inflammation-related processes by inhibition of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase to reduce the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infections This drug interaction study was performed to determine if emvododstat was an inhibitor of CYP2D6. METHODS: Potential drug-drug interactions between emvododstat and a CYP2D6 probe substrate (dextromethorphan) were investigated by measuring plasma dextromethorphan and metabolite (dextrorphan) concentrations before and after emvododstat administration. On day 1, 18 healthy subjects received an oral dose of 30 mg dextromethorphan followed by a 4-day washout period. On day 5, subjects received an oral dose of 250 mg emvododstat with food. Two hours later, 30 mg dextromethorphan was administered. RESULTS: When given with emvododstat, plasma dextromethorphan concentrations increased substantially, while metabolite levels (dextrorphan) remained essentially the same. Maximum plasma dextromethorphan concentration (Cmax) increased from 2006 to 5847 pg/mL. Dextromethorphan exposure (AUC) increased from 18,829 to 157,400 h·pg/mL for AUC0-last and from 21,585 to 362,107 h·pg/mL for AUC0-inf following administration of emvododstat. When dextromethorphan parameters were compared before and after emvododstat, least squares mean ratios (90% confidence interval) were found to be 2.9 (2.2, 3.8), 8.4 (6.1, 11.5), and 14.9 (10.0, 22.1) for Cmax, AUC0-last, and AUC0-inf, respectively. CONCLUSION: Emvododstat appears to be a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor. No drug-related treatment emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) were considered to be severe or serious. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2021-004626-29, 11 May 2021.

A pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study between rosuvastatin and emvododstat, a potent anti-SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) DHODH (dihydroorotate dehydrogenase) inhibitor.

A therapeutic agent that targets both viral replication and the hyper-reactive immune response would offer a highly desirable treatment for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19) management. Emvododstat (PTC299) was found to be a potent inhibitor of immunomodulatory and inflammation-related processes by the inhibition of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) to reduce SARS-CoV-2 replication. DHODH is the rate-limiting enzyme of the de novo pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis pathway. This drug interaction study was performed to determine whether emvododstat was an inhibitor of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) transporters in humans. Potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between emvododstat and a BCRP transporter substrate (rosuvastatin) were investigated by measuring plasma rosuvastatin concentrations before and after emvododstat administration. There was no apparent difference in rosuvastatin plasma exposure. The geometric means of maximum plasma rosuvastatin concentrations (Cmax ) were 4369 (rosuvastatin) and 5141 pg/mL (rosuvastatin + emvododstat) at 4 h postdose. Geometric mean rosuvastatin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last measurable plasma concentration was 45 616 and 48 975 h·pg/mL when administered alone and after 7 days of b.i.d. emvododstat dosing, respectively. Geometric least squares mean ratios for Cmax and AUC were approximately equal to 1. Overall, administration of multiple doses of 100 mg emvododstat b.i.d. for 7 days in combination with a single dose of rosuvastatin was safe and well tolerated. Emvododstat can be safely administered with other BCRP substrate drugs. Hence, pharmacokinetic DDI mediated via BCRP inhibition is not expected when emvododstat and BCRP substrates are coadministered.

Correlation of Subjective Effects with Systemic Opioid Exposure from Fixed-Dose Combinations of Oxycodone/Acetaminophen in Recreational Users of Prescription Drugs.

OBJECTIVE: To correlate abuse-related pharmacodynamic measures and pharmacokinetic measures after administering immediate-release/extended-release and immediate-release oxycodone/acetaminophen fixed-dose combination analgesicsDesign. Randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, 7-way crossover studySetting. Contract research organizationSubjects. Nondependent recreational users of prescription opioids. METHODS: Participants received single doses of intact immediate-release/extended-release and immediate-release oxycodone/acetaminophen 15/650 mg, intact immediate-release/extended-release and immediate-release oxycodone/acetaminophen 30/1,300 mg, crushed immediate-release/extended-release and immediate-release oxycodone/acetaminophen 30/1,300 mg, and placebo. Measures of pharmacodynamics (pupillometry, drug liking, drug high, good drug effects) and pharmacokinetics were assessed predose and up to 24 hours postdose, and correlations between pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic data were explored. RESULTS: Of 61 participants, 55 completed all 7 treatments. Intact immediate-release/extended-release oxycodone/acetaminophen produced 50% lower oxycodone peak plasma concentration (Cmax) than immediate-release oxycodone/acetaminophen. Median oxycodone time to Cmax (tmax) was significantly longer (P<0.001) for intact immediate-release/extended-release oxycodone/acetaminophen than immediate-release oxycodone/acetaminophen. The pharmacokinetics of crushed immediate-release/extended-release and immediate-release oxycodone/acetaminophen (30/1,300 mg) followed a similar pattern. Crushing did not shorten the median oxycodone tmax for immediate-release/extended-release oxycodone/acetaminophen (30/1,300 mg). Strong correlations were observed between oxycodone Cmax and area under the curve from time 0 to time x peak effects and area under the subjective effect curve from time 0 to time x for all subjective effects (R2=0.711-0.997). CONCLUSION: Immediate-release/extended-release oxycodone/acetaminophen produced lower oxycodone Cmax and longer tmax than immediate-release oxycodone/acetaminophen. Lower oxycodone concentrations, particularly at earlier time points, were strongly correlated with lesser positive subjective drug effects.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics following application of a novel transdermal estradiol spray in healthy postmenopausal women.

This study was designed to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics (PK) of estradiol and its metabolites, estrone and estrone sulfate, following application of a novel estradiol transdermal spray to healthy postmenopausal women. Participants were randomly assigned in parallel to receive 1-, 2-, or 3-spray doses (24 participants/dose level) of a 1.7% estradiol metered-dose transdermal spray (1.53 mg/spray) once daily for 14 days. Blood was collected predose on days 1 to 14 and over 7 days after the last dose. Serum concentrations for all 3 analytes reached steady state by day 7 or 8 and were still slightly above baseline on day 21. Estradiol, estrone, and estrone sulfate serum concentrations generally increased with increasing dose. Mean estradiol and estrone maximum serum concentration (C(max)) following 1, 2, or 3 sprays for 14 days were 36 and 50, 57 and 60, and 54 and 71 pg/mL, respectively. Estradiol time when maximum concentration occurred (t(max)) was 18 to 20 hours. The area under the serum concentration-time curve over 24 hours following the last dose of study drug (AUC(0-24 h)) on day 14 for the 1-, 2-, and 3-spray groups, respectively, was 471, 736, and 742 pg.h/mL for estradiol; 886, 1208, and 1367 pg x h/mL for estrone; and 16,501, 26,515, and 27,971 pg x h/mL for estrone sulfate. The metered-dose estradiol transdermal spray delivers estradiol at therapeutic levels and produces low serum estrone concentrations.

Gender differences and hormonal modulation of G proteins Galpha(q/11) expression in lymphoid organs.

Androgens and estrogens exert potent divergent feedback effects on gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) production at the level of the hypothalamus and GnRH action at the level of the pituitary. Androgens exert generally suppressive effects on GnRH production and action, whereas rising levels of estradiol increase both GnRH release and action. In addition to its known endocrine actions, GnRH possesses immunomodulatory effects. We have previously demonstrated gender differences in immune responsiveness to GnRH that parallel gender differences in endocrine responsiveness: females appear to be more immunologically responsive to GnRH than males. GnRH exerts its actions via the stimulatory G protein Galpha(q) and Galpha(11) (referred to collectively as Galpha(q/11)) as well as via Galpha(s). We have recently demonstrated that the heightened immune responsiveness to GnRH in lupus-prone female mice correlated with increased expression of Galpha(q/11) in lymphoid cells from females compared to males. We hypothesize that the hormonal milieu of females may contribute to increased expression of stimulatory G proteins and to the heightened immune and endocrine responsiveness to GnRH. In this report, we document gender differences in expression of Galpha(q/11) protein in lymphoid organs in non-autoimmune DBA/2 mice. In an effort to address the mechanisms for the gender differences in G-protein expression, we used competitive reverse transcription PCR to quantitate mRNA for stimulatory G proteins in immune cells under various hormonal conditions. We quantitated the expression of Galpha(q/11) mRNA and protein under physiologic hormonal alterations, i.e. throughout the estrous cycle in female mice. We demonstrate that expression of Galpha(q/11) mRNA and protein in lymphoid organs is significantly increased on the afternoon of proestrus compared to metestrus. Additional studies demonstrate that exposure to GnRH or to estrogens significantly increases the expression of Galpha(q/11) mRNA in immune cells. These findings support an active role for hormonal modulation of G proteins in the gender differences in endocrinologic and immunologic responsiveness to GnRH.

Administration of antisense oligonucleotides to Galpha(Q/11) reduces the severity of murine lupus.

Our principle hypothesis is that the hypothalamic hormone, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), is an immunostimulatory hormone and plays a pivotal role in the gender differences in immunity and/or autoimmunity. As a general rule, females display heightened immune responses and heightened endocrinological responsiveness to GnRH compared to males. We have previously demonstrated that GnRH receptor antagonists are effective in ameliorating murine lupus and that GnRH receptor agonists exacerbate murine lupus. GnRH exerts its actions via stimulatory G proteins, specifically via Galpha(s) and the homologous G proteins Galpha(q) and Galpha(11) (referred to together as Galpha(q/11)). We have previously demonstrated that females express higher levels of Galpha(q/11) mRNA and protein compared to males. We hypothesized that antisense inhibition of these specific G proteins would lead to a reduction in inflammatory cytokines and to an amelioration of disease in a mouse model of lupus. We randomized gonadectomized female (NZB x NZW) F1 hybrid mice to treatment with antisense oligonucleotides to Galpha(q/11) or to missense oligonucleotides. Administration of antisense oligonucleotides to Galpha(q/11) led to significant reductions in autoantibody levels, serum IgG levels, hematuria, and proteinuria compared to missense oligos. A trend toward prolonged survival was also noted. In vitro co-culture experiments demonstrated that antisense to Galpha(q/11) significantly inhibited IL-6 production compared to control.