Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 246, 2023 Apr 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37072718

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Critically ill COVID-19 patients are highly susceptible to opportunistic fungal infection due to many factors, including virus-induced immune dysregulation, host-related comorbidities, overuse and misuse of antibiotics or corticosteroids, immune modulator drugs, and the emergencies caused by the pandemic. This study aimed to assess the incidence, identify the potential risk factors, and examine the impact of fungal coinfection on the outcomes of COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A prospective cohort study including 253 critically ill COVID-19 patients aged 18 years or older admitted to the isolation ICU of Zagazig University Hospitals over a 4-month period from May 2021 to August 2021 was conducted. The detection of a fungal infection was carried out. RESULTS: Eighty-three (83) patients (32.8%) were diagnosed with a fungal coinfection. Candida was the most frequently isolated fungus in 61 (24.1%) of 253 critically ill COVID-19 patients, followed by molds, which included Aspergillus 11 (4.3%) and mucormycosis in five patients (1.97%), and six patients (2.4%) diagnosed with other rare fungi. Poor diabetic control, prolonged or high-dose steroids, and multiple comorbidities were all possible risk factors for fungal coinfection [OR (95% CI) = 10.21 (3.43-30.39), 14.1 (5.67-35.10), 14.57 (5.83-33.78), and 4.57 (1.83-14.88), respectively]. CONCLUSION: Fungal coinfection is a common complication of critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU. Candidiasis, aspergillosis, and mucormycosis are the most common COVID-19-associated fungal infections and have a great impact on mortality rates.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Coinfecção , Mucormicose , Micoses , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estado Terminal , Coinfecção/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Micoses/epidemiologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Hospitais Universitários
2.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 16(11): 1715-1725, 2022 11 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36449643

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: To date, the world has experienced four waves of the Coronavirus disease- 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. Patients infected during the era of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Delta variant were the subject of this study. The objectives were to describe their clinical manifestations, explain their laboratory and radiological findings, conclude factors contributing to clinical outcomes, and evaluate treatment protocols. METHODOLOGY: Relevant data were collected retrospectively from records of patients admitted to six referral centers in four countries. Data included sociodemographic patterns, symptoms, associated comorbidities, physical examination, laboratory and radiologic findings, treatment received, and patient outcomes. RESULTS: Data analysis identified symptomatology and variables related to acquisition and infection outcome. The most prevalent symptoms were cough (81.5%), body aches (74.1%), and fever (71.6%). Independent risk factors for mortality were age, vomiting, epigastric pain, diabetes, obesity, oxygen saturation less than 90%, leukocytosis, neutrophilia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated creatinine, high glucose level, lung ground glass opacities with consolidation, affection of four lobes and bilateralism. Neither d-dimer nor lactate dehydrogenase nor ferritin foretells death possibility. The efficacy of the medications used was convenient. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing the clinical features of different COVID-19 waves, identifying predictors of outcomes, and concluding the efficacy of treatment protocols provide insight into patients' responses and viral behaviors, which help in the proper diagnosis and treatment of subsequent surges.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Trombocitopenia , Humanos , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Travel Med Infect Dis ; 48: 102334, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35470069

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It has been found that patients recovered from COVID 19 may still test Reverse Transcriptase- Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT- PCR) positive without being infectious; the reasons are unclear. The occurrence of false-negative results of RT- PCR interferes with a proper diagnosis. The objectives of that work were to determine factors associated with persistently detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA among recovered hospitalized patients and to determine the incidence of false-negative RT-PCR results and associated factors. METHODS: Relevant data were collected from 482 COVID 19 patients hospitalized in six referral centers from four countries. RESULTS: The median duration of RT- PCR conversion to negative was 20 days. Out of 482 studied patients, 8.7% tested positive after more than four weeks and were considered prolonged convertors. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed headache as an independent risk factor for short conversion time while fever, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lymphopenia, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and the number of lobes affected, and bilateralism were found to be independent risk factors for prolonged positivity. Eighteen patients had initial negative results then turned positive after 24-48 h. Associated factors and outcomes were identified. CONCLUSION: Identifying patients with a high likelihood of COVID-19 despite a negative RT-PCR is critical for effective clinical care. However, patient isolation resumption depending on positive RT-PCR despite clinical and radiological recovery is an overrating that greatly burdens the health sector.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Humanos , RNA Viral , Sistema Respiratório , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa
4.
Infect Drug Resist ; 11: 1261-1269, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30197524

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Carbapenamase producing Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are emerging worldwide limiting the use of carbapenems as effective and safe drugs. PURPOSE: To characterize different carbapenemase genes carried by carbapenem-resistant (CR) A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa isolates and to evaluate the in vitro effect of some colistin-based combinations by E-test method in Zagazig University Hospitals ICU isolates. METHODS: CR A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa isolated from the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) were tested for carbapenemase genes by polymerase chain reaction and the effect of colistin/meropenem and colistin/tigecycline combinations was evaluated by E-test. RESULTS: Genes coding for OXA-23, NDM and GES were detected in 90, 66.7 and 50% of CR A. baumannii, respectively, while genes coding for VIM, GES, NDM and IMP were detected in 50, 40.9, 27.3 and 18.2% of CR P. aeruginosa, respectively. Colistin/tigecycline combination showed synergistic and additive effect in 20% and 60% of A. baumannii isolates, respectively, while colistin/meropenem combination showed synergistic and additive effect in 63.6% and 36.4% of P. aeruginosa, respectively. CONCLUSION: Carbapenemase genes carriage accounts for high level carbapenem resistance in our isolates. Colistin/tigecycline and colistin/meropenem combinations can be considered for treatment of severe infections by CR A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa, respectively.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...