[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on admissions for acute coronary syndrome: review of the literature and single-center experience]. / Impatto della pandemia COVID-19 sui ricoveri per sindrome coronarica acuta: revisione della letteratura ed esperienza monocentrica.

During the early phase of the lockdown following the COVID-19 pandemic, an alarm on the impact on cardiology admissions for cardiac causes, particularly in the field of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), has emerged. In order to evaluate this trend, we analyzed the literature data published since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic to date, in addition to our intensive cardiac care unit (ICCU) experience. This analysis showed (i) a reduction of the overall ICCU admissions up to 50%; (ii) a 40-50% reduction of ACS admissions, greater for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) than for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); (iii) a reduction greater than 50% of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary angioplasty; (iv) a higher time delay of STEMI; and (v) a higher number of ICCU admissions for non-primarily cardiac problems. In conclusion, the lockdown imposed due to the spread of COVID-19 infection has led to a change in the number and type of cardiology admissions. It seems therefore necessary that patients, especially for time-dependent diseases such as ACS, continue to refer to hospital care; that contemporary standard of care for acute cardiac disease should be guaranteed, and that intensivist cardiologists acquire specific skills for the treatment of patients with clinical conditions normally treated by other specialists.

Phrenic stimulation: a challenge for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Phrenic stimulation (PS) may hinder left ventricular (LV) pacing. We prospectively observed its prevalence in consecutive patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the years 2003 to 2006, 197 patients received a CRT device. PS and LV threshold measurements were carried out at implantation and at 6-month follow-up. LV reverse remodeling was assessed by echocardiography before implantation and at follow-up. LV lead placement was lateral/posterolateral in 86% of patients. Both PS and LV reverse remodeling occurred most frequently at the lateral/posterolateral LV pacing sites (P<0.001). PS was detected in 73 (37%) of patients and was clinically relevant in 41 (22%). The detection of PS at implantation had a poor sensitivity, as it occurred only in left lateral or sitting position in 27 patients. Ten patients (5%) underwent repeated surgery and 4 (2%) had their CRT turned off because of PS. At follow-up, we could manage PS noninvasively in 32 patients with a small PS-LV threshold difference: in 20 by cathode programmability (3 also thanks to automatic management of LV output) and in 12 (without cathode programmability) by programming the LV output as threshold +1 V. CONCLUSIONS: PS may seriously hinder CRT. A bipolar LV lead and cathode programmability are mandatory to avoid PS by changing the LV pacing vector at target sites for CRT. LV stability at target sites despite PS should also be pursued by these means. The automatic adjustment of LV pacing output is complementary in patients with a small PS-LV threshold difference.