Modified Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Nonhealing Esophageal Anastomotic Leak: Technique Description and Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) therapy is increasingly being used as a new promising method for repairing upper gastrointestinal defects of different etiologies with high success rates. EVAC therapy consists of placing a sponge either within the lumen or within an abscess cavity connected with a nasogastric (NG) tube to a negative pressure system, thus decreasing bacterial contamination and edema and promoting granulation tissue proliferation, thereby gradually decreasing the cavity size until complete closure. Herein, we describe a modified technique for EVAC therapy in which the NG tube is passed into the esophagus through an existing intrapleural drain tract using a rendezvous technique. The small residual fistula was amendable to fibrin glue embolization. This allows easier sponge placement and exchange compared to traditional EVAC technique, and allows oral intake during treatment. We also review the literature regarding other endoscopic treatment options for esophageal anastomotic leaks and perforations. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched using the terms "esophagus," "esophageal," "leak," "fistula," "endoluminal vacuum-assisted closure (VAC)," "endoscopic VAC," "stent," "sealant," "glue," and "over-the-scope clip (OTSC)." Reference lists of identified articles were searched for further articles, and the "similar articles" function was used on all included articles. RESULTS: Complete closure of the nonhealing fistula was achieved after 8 days of EVAC treatment and fibrin glue embolization. CONCLUSIONS: Modified EVAC technique as described is feasible and safe. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of this technique. The technique allows easier sponge placement and exchange compared to traditional EVAC technique, and allows oral intake during treatment.

Perforations following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a single institution experience and surgical recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is uncommon, and its management is dependent on the mechanism and the graded classification of injury. METHODS: Records of patients undergoing ERCP were analyzed over a 16-year period, patterning the types of injuries, diagnosis, management, and patient outcome. Type I injuries damage the medial or lateral duodenal wall before sphincter cannulation. Type II injuries are periampullary and occur as a result of a precut or a papillotomy. Type III injuries occur secondary to guidewire insertion or stone extraction from the common bile duct. Type IV injuries are probably microperforations that are noted on excessive insufflation during and after ERCP withdrawal. RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2011, 27 perforations were identified from 1,638 ERCP procedures (1.6%). Nearly half of the procedures were regarded as difficult by the endoscopist, with 70% of the ERCPs (19 of 27) being for therapeutic indications. There were 5 type I, 12 type II, 5 type III, and 5 type IV perforations, of which 18 cases were diagnosed at the time of ERCP. Delayed diagnosis of type I perforations that were associated with free intraperitoneal air and contrast leakage proved fatal. Most type II perforations required immediate surgery with pyloric exclusion; delayed surgery with simple drainage had a high mortality rate. Most type III and type IV injuries can successfully be managed conservatively without delayed sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: In perforation, the mechanism of injury during ERCP predicts the need for surgical management. Type I and type II injuries require early diagnosis and aggressive surgery, whereas type III and type IV injuries may be managed conservatively.