Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Nephrol ; 102(2): 73-78, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38699984

RESUMO

Controversy exists as to the optimal observational time (OT) after outpatient percutaneous kidney biopsy. Further, there is some uncertainty about the benefit of smaller (18-gauge) vs. larger (16-gauge) biopsy needles. At our institution, we have been lowering the OT after outpatient kidney biopsies. Initially in 2015, we were monitoring for 6 hours and gradually began to decrease the OT over time. From 2020, we have adopted an OT of less than 4 hours. During this time period (in 2018), we also began using a smaller gauge needle (18 gauge). We reviewed all outpatient kidney biopsies performed by the nephrology division at our institution since 2015. There were 137 biopsies reviewed. 63 had OT of 4 - 6 hours, and 74 had OT < 4 hours. There was a total of 4 significant complications (2.9%). Two complications, symptomatic retroperitoneal bleeds, were detected in less than 3 hours. The other 2 complications were seen at 9 hours (clot retention) and 72 hours (retroperitoneal bleed after anticoagulation restarted). 63% of the biopsies were done using 18-gauge needles with 1 complication in this group vs. 3 in the 16-gauge group. All cases had adequate tissue for interpretation based on the ability to make a kidney diagnosis. The number of glomeruli obtained in the 18-gauge group was 29 ± 13 glomeruli, and in the 16-gauge group was 25 ± 10, which did not differ between groups. In summary, in an outpatient population, all significant post-biopsy complications were evident either within the first 3 hours or after 9 hours, and this suggests the feasibility of using shorter than standard OT in outpatient kidney biopsies. Furthermore, an 18-gauge needle may lower the risk of complications and obtain adequate tissue.


Assuntos
Rim , Agulhas , Humanos , Rim/patologia , Feminino , Masculino , Fatores de Tempo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Biópsia por Agulha/instrumentação , Biópsia por Agulha/métodos , Biópsia por Agulha/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Desenho de Equipamento , Assistência Ambulatorial , Nefropatias/patologia
2.
Clin Kidney J ; 15(12): 2220-2227, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36381376

RESUMO

The physical exam is changing. Many have argued that the physical exam of the 21st century should include point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). POCUS is being taught in medical schools and has been endorsed by the major professional societies of internal medicine. In this review we describe the trend toward using POCUS in medicine and describe where the practicing nephrologist fits in. We discuss what a nephrologist's POCUS exam should entail and we give special attention to what nephrologists can gain from learning POCUS. We suggest a 'nephro-centric' approach that includes not only ultrasound of the kidney and bladder, but of the heart, lungs and vascular access. We conclude by reviewing some of the sparse data available to guide training initiatives and give suggested next steps for advancing POCUS in nephrology.

3.
Kidney Int ; 101(5): 1085-1086, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35461599
4.
POCUS J ; 7(Kidney): 35-44, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36896100
6.
Kidney360 ; 2(7): 1087-1094, 2021 07 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35368359

RESUMO

Background: Although electrolyte abnormalities are common among patients with COVID-19, very little has been reported on magnesium homeostasis in these patients. Here we report the incidence of hypermagnesemia, and its association with outcomes among patients admitted with COVID-19. Methods: We retrospectively identified all patients with a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2 who were admitted to a large quaternary care center in New York City in spring 2020. Details of the patients' demographics and hospital course were obtained retrospectively from medical records. Patients were defined as having hypermagnesemia if their median magnesium over the course of their hospitalization was >2.4 mg/dl. Results: A total of 1685 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 had their magnesium levels checked during their hospitalization, and were included in the final study cohort, among whom 355 (21%) had hypermagnesemia. Patients who were hypermagnesemic had a higher incidence of shock requiring pressors (35% vs 27%, P<0.01), respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (28% vs 21%, P=0.01), AKI (65% vs 50%, P<0.001), and AKI severe enough to require renal replacement therapy (18% vs 5%, P<0.001). In an adjusted multivariable model, hypermagnesemia was observed more commonly with increasing age, male sex, AKI requiring RRT, hyperkalemia, and higher CPK. Survival probability at 30 days was 34% for the patients with hypermagnesemia, compared with 65% for patients without hypermagnesemia. An adjusted multivariable time to event analysis identified an increased risk of mortality with older age, need for vasopressors, higher C-reactive protein levels, and hypermagnesemia (HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.63 to 2.54, P<0.001). Conclusions: In conclusion, we identified an association between hypermagnesemia among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and increased mortality. Although the exact mechanism of this relationship remains unclear, hypermagnesemia potentially represents increased cell turnover and higher severity of illness, which is frequently associated with more severe forms of AKI.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , COVID-19 , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , Magnésio , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Kidney360 ; 2(7): 1152-1155, 2021 07 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35368363

RESUMO

AKI frequently occurs in patients with COVID-19, and kidney injury severe enough to require RRT is a common complication among patients who are critically ill. During the surge of the pandemic, there was a high demand for dialysate for continuous RRT, and this increase in demand, coupled with vulnerabilities in the supply chain, necessitated alternative approaches, including internal production of dialysate. Using a standard hemodialysis machine and off-the-shelf supplies, as per Food and Drug Administration guidelines, we developed a method for on-site dialysate production that is adaptable and can be used to fill multiple bags at once. The use of a central reverse osmosis unit, dedicated hemodialysis machine, sterile bags with separate ports for fill and use, and frequent testing will ensure stability, sterility, and-therefore-safety of the produced dialysate. The dialysate made in house was tested and it showed both stability and sterility for at least 30 hours. This detailed description of our process for generating dialysate can serve as a guide for other programs experiencing similar vulnerabilities in the demand versus supply of dialysate.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , COVID-19 , Terapia de Substituição Renal Contínua , Injúria Renal Aguda/terapia , Soluções para Diálise , Humanos , Pandemias , Estados Unidos
8.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0244131, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33370368

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: A large proportion of patients with COVID-19 develop acute kidney injury (AKI). While the most severe of these cases require renal replacement therapy (RRT), little is known about their clinical course. METHODS: We describe the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients in the ICU with AKI requiring RRT at an academic medical center in New York City and followed patients for outcomes of death and renal recovery using time-to-event analyses. RESULTS: Our cohort of 115 patients represented 23% of all ICU admissions at our center, with a peak prevalence of 29%. Patients were followed for a median of 29 days (2542 total patient-RRT-days; median 54 days for survivors). Mechanical ventilation and vasopressor use were common (99% and 84%, respectively), and the median Sequential Organ Function Assessment (SOFA) score was 14. By the end of follow-up 51% died, 41% recovered kidney function (84% of survivors), and 8% still needed RRT (survival probability at 60 days: 0.46 [95% CI: 0.36-0.56])). In an adjusted Cox model, coronary artery disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were associated with increased mortality (HRs: 3.99 [95% CI 1.46-10.90] and 3.10 [95% CI 1.25-7.66]) as were angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (HR 2.33 [95% CI 1.21-4.47]) and a SOFA score >15 (HR 3.46 [95% CI 1.65-7.25). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our analysis demonstrates the high prevalence of AKI requiring RRT among critically ill patients with COVID-19 and is associated with a high mortality, however, the rate of renal recovery is high among survivors and should inform shared-decision making.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/patologia , COVID-19/complicações , Rim/patologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/virologia , Idoso , Estado Terminal/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Rim/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Terapia de Substituição Renal/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Sobreviventes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...