RESUMO
(1) Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate our institutional outcome in tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM) patients treated microsurgically using multiple skull base approaches, including a transcranial approach and an extended endonasal transsphenoidal approach. (2) Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study that includes 34 patients with TSM. The study aimed to observe the efficacy of the different common approaches used by a single neurosurgeon. All the patients were evaluated preoperatively and during follow-up with campimetry, head CT scan, and post-contrast MRI. (3) Results: After a transcranial approach, visual acuity improved in 86.20%, was stable in 10.34%, and deteriorated in 3.45%. Through transsphenoidal surgery, vision improved in 80%, was static in 20%, and deteriorated in 0%. Transcranial approaches included pterional, mini-bifrontal basal, and supraciliary keyhole microscopic craniotomies. Gross total removal was performed in 58.82%, near total in 10.34%, and partial removal in 3.45%. The transcranial/supraciliary keyhole endoscopic-assisted approach showed a gross total removal rate of 80%, and near total in 20%. The transsphenoidal approach showed a gross total removal rate of 60%, near total in 20%, and partial removal in 20%. (4) Conclusion: Endoscopic-assisted keyhole supraciliary mini craniotomy for resection of tuberculum sellae meningioma offers low morbidity and good visual outcome. The endonasal route is preferred for the removal of TSM when they are small and midline placed. The major limitation of this approach is a narrow surgical corridor and the restriction on midline-placed lesions. Gross total removal was better achieved with mini-bifrontal basal and pterional craniotomies.
RESUMO
Objective: Evidence from developing countries on the association between women’s endorsement of attitudes justifying partner abuse and their use of reproductive health services is suggestive but inconclusive. This study uses a nationally representative dataset from Lao PDR to provide strong evidence for the relationship between women’s endorsement of attitudes justifying partner abuse and use of reproductive health services.Methods: This study used data from the 2011–2012 Lao Social Indicator survey (LSIS). The analyses were performed on the responses of 4227 women. The exposure of interest in this study was endorsement of attitudes justifying partner abuse. Antenatal care (ANC) visits divided according to amount and quality, delivery care by type and place, and utilization of postnatal care (PNC) for mothers and newborn infants were used as representative outcome variables of reproductive health service utilization.Results: Approximately seven out of ten respondents (67.9%) believed that partner abuse was justified. Women who endorsed these attitudes were significantly less likely to receive any ANC, to seek institutional delivery, and to use trained medical personnel for delivery assistance. Endorsing attitudes were associated with reduced probability of receiving PNC services for mothers and newborn infants, reduced frequency of ANC visits, and receiving a fewer number of ANC components. Other sociodemographic factors likely to affect the increased utilization of several of the indicators of reproductive health care were living in the central region, belonging to the high bands of wealth, having higher level of education, being a young adult (20–34 years) or older (35–49 years), residing in urban areas, and being sexually empowered.Conclusions: In addition to a broad range of sociodemographic factors, our findings suggested that women’s endorsement of attitudes justifying partner abuse should be treated as an important psychosocial determinant of reproductive health care service utilization in Lao PDR.
