Getting It Right At The End Of Life.

With the help of a palliative care team, the author's terminally ill mother dies on her own terms.

Changes in patient flow among five hospitals participating in a learning collaborative.

This was an evaluation of the efforts of five hospitals that participated in a collaborative aimed at improving patient flow and reducing emergency department (ED) crowding. Interviews with hospital implementation team members were conducted at two separate times, and multivariate linear regression models and bivariate logistic models were constructed to assess changes in ED length of stay (LOS) and left without being seen (LWBS). By the end of the collaborative, four of the five hospitals had at least one fully implemented improvement strategy. Those hospitals experienced modest improvements in patient flow: a hospital that implemented front-end improvements and devoted additional resources to fast track had a 51-min reduction in ED LOS, another that implemented only front-end improvements had a 9-min reduction in LOS, a third hospital that improved communication between the ED and inpatient units to facilitate admissions decreased LWBS from 0.6% to 0.4%, and a fourth hospital reduced LOS by 59 min for mid-acuity patients by establishing a new care process for them. Results suggest that relatively small changes may lead to improvements in measures of patient flow that are modest, at best.

Time and expenses associated with the implementation of strategies to reduce emergency department crowding.

INTRODUCTION: The Emergency Nurses Association and other groups have encouraged the adoption of patient flow improvement strategies to reduce ED crowding, but little is known about time and expenses associated with implementation. The purpose of this study was to estimate the time spent and expenses incurred as 6 Urgent Matters hospitals planned and implemented strategies to improve patient flow and reduce crowding. METHODS: We conducted key informant interviews with members of the hospitals' patient flow improvement teams at 2 points in time: immediately after strategy implementation and approximately 6 months later. A total of 129 interviews were conducted using a semistructured interview protocol. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded for analysis. RESULTS: Eight strategies were implemented. The time spent planning and implementing the strategies ranged from 40 to 1,017 hours per strategy. The strategies were largely led by nurses, and collectively, nurses spent more time planning and implementing strategies than others. The most time-consuming strategies were those that involved extensive staff training, large implementation teams, or complex process changes. Only 3 strategies involved sizable expenditures, ranging from $32,850 to $490,000. Construction and the addition of new personnel represented the most costly expenditures. DISCUSSION: The time and expenses involved in the adoption of patient flow improvement strategies are highly variable. Nurses play an important role in leading and implementing these efforts. Hospital, ED, and nurse leaders should set realistic expectations for the time and expenses needed to support patient flow improvement.

Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of patient flow improvement strategies.

Patient flow improvement strategies have been effective in reducing emergency department (ED) crowding, but little guidance is available on the implementation process. By using a qualitative research design, our objective was to identify common facilitators and barriers to the implementation of patient flow improvement strategies and successful approaches for mitigating barriers. Six hospitals participated in an 18-month Urgent Matters learning network launched in October 2008. The hospitals selected strategies to improve patient flow that could be implemented within 3 months with measurable impact. Across 6 hospitals, 8 strategies were implemented. We conducted 2 rounds of key informant interviews with improvement teams, for a total of 129 interviews. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded by using a grounded theory approach to identify common themes. Factors facilitating implementation included participation in the learning network and strategic selection of team members. Common challenges included staff resistance and entrenched organizational culture. Some of the challenges were mitigated through approaches such as staff education and department leaders' constant reinforcement. Our findings indicate that several facilitators and barriers are common to the implementation of different strategies. Leveraging facilitators and developing a strategy to address common barriers may leave hospital and ED leaders better prepared to implement patient flow improvement strategies.