The influence of cantilever length and implant inclination on stress distribution in maxillary implant-supported fixed dentures.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The benefits and limitations of jaw treatments with tilted versus vertical implants, as well as prosthesis design with and without posterior cantilevers, have been extensively discussed. However, biomechanical advantages associated with cantilevers in fixed dentures (FDs) and tilted implants in the maxillae are less well documented. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze, via 3-dimensional (3-D) finite element analysis, stresses transmitted to tilted versus vertical implants and the surrounding periimplant bone in the maxillae. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 3-D edentulous maxillary model was created using customized computer software (FEMAP 8.3). Four implants were virtually placed in the premaxilla and splinted with an FD. Keeping the prosthesis length constant, 4 different configurations were evaluated with the distal implants inclined 0, 15, 30, and 45 degrees; cantilever extensions were 13, 9, 5, and 0 mm, respectively. A vertical load (150 N) was applied to the distal portion of the posterior cantilevers. Von Mises' stress values transmitted to periimplant bone and at the metal framework of FDs on implants were evaluated in cancellous and cortical bone. RESULTS: The maximum stresses recorded in periimplant bone for the vertical implants were 75.0 MPa (distal implants), 35.0 MPa (mesial implants), and 95.0 MPa for the metal frameworks. Tilted distal implants, with consequent reduction of the posterior cantilevers, resulted in decreased stress values for all of the variables: -12.9%, -18.3%, and -11.5% for the 15-degree configuration; -47.5%, -52.6%, and -31.3% for the 30-degree configuration; and -73.5%, -77.7%, and -85.6% for the 45-degree configuration CONCLUSIONS: Finite element analysis data regarding rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae revealed that tilted distal implants, rigidly splinted with an FD, decrease stress in the periimplant bone and frameworks. This treatment modality seems to be a valid therapeutic alternative to conventional maxillary fixed complete prostheses supported by vertical dental implants with posterior cantilevers.

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths.

Many clinical studies have reported high survival rates for tilted implants. However, tilted implants transmit increased stress to bone when compared to vertically placed implants. Theoretical (computer-based), laboratory, and clinical studies are warranted to effectively address this issue. In this study, a 3-dimensional finite element analysis was performed to analyze the stress values surrounding tilted versus vertical implants. The results revealed laboratory and biomechanical evidence that distal tilting of implants, splinted in full fixed prostheses without cantilevers, reduced the amount of stress generated around the peri-implant bone when compared to the levels of stress seen in peri-implant bone with vertical implants and cantilevered segments in similar full fixed prostheses.

Tooth-implant connection: some biomechanical aspects based on finite element analyses.

This study investigated, with the use of two- and three-dimensional finite element analysis, the peri-implant stress that occurred during loading of a tooth that was rigidly connected to a distally placed implant. A fixed bond between the bone and the implant was assumed, while the periodontal ligament was represented by means of three-dimensional nonlinear visco-elastic spring elements. Two different loading conditions were compared in the study: i) an axially directed static load of 50 kg that was applied to the tooth for 10 s, and ii) a transitional load of 50 kg that was applied for 5 milliseconds. Load duration appeared to have a greater influence than load intensity on the stress distribution in the bone around an implant and a rigidly connected tooth. Static load is, therefore, potentially more harmful for peri-implant bone than transitional load. The periodontal ligament seems to play a key role in the stress distribution between a tooth and a rigidly connected implant.