Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Masui ; 53(10): 1136-42, 2004 Oct.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15552945

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of services by patients is an essential component of quality improvement in anesthesiology. Therefore, it is important to identify the factors for patient dissatisfaction. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 9974 consecutive patients who had received spinal or general anesthesia for elective surgery between 1999 and 2002. Pre-anesthetic, intra-anesthetic and post-anesthetic variables were recorded and patient satisfaction was assessed using direct interviews at the post-anesthetic clinic. Qualitative data on dissatisfaction were obtained by asking patients' reasons for dissatisfaction. RESULTS: 348 of the 8843 respondents (3.9%) had dissatisfaction with anesthesia. The rates of dissatisfaction were higher in women than in men and in spinal anesthesia than in general anesthesia, and were observed mostly in the patients aged from 20 to 39 years. Qualitative data show that the common reasons for dissatisfaction with anesthesia were spinal anesthesia as the most dissatisfactory factor, followed by epidural anesthesia, postoperative pain, vomiting/nausea and memory of tracheal extubation. However, other various factors were associated with dissatisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult for anesthesiologists to satisfy all patients, because patients' senses of values were varied. However, we conclude that anesthesiologists can improve the quality of anesthesia by enlightenment of the patient about anesthesia, and moreover, by better peri-anesthetic management for dissatisfactory factors with anesthesia.


Assuntos
Anestesia Geral/psicologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Anestesia Epidural/psicologia , Raquianestesia/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/epidemiologia
2.
Masui ; 52(6): 621-5, 2003 Jun.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12854477

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the hemodynamic efficacy of combined cathecholamine and three different continuous infusion doses of olprinone (0.05, 0.1, 0.3 microgram.kg-1.min-1) in 24 cases (0.05 group: 8 cases, 0.1 group: 8 cases, 0.3 group: 8 cases) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: Olprinone was administered as a single dose (0.1 mg.kg-1) into the venous reservoir of the CPB circuit 15 min prior to the end of emergence from CPB, followed by continuous infusion. Hemodynamics were measured at the time of preCPB (M 0), just after the end of CPB (M 1), pre chest closure (M 2) and after chest closure (M 3). Cathecholamines were used to maintain mean arterial pressure (> 65 mmHg) and cardiac index (> 3.0 l.min-1.m-2). Hemodynamics (at M 0, M 1, M 2 and M 3) and the number of cases requiring combined cathecholamine were compared among the 3 doses. RESULTS: Three doses showed no significant difference on hemodynamics. In the number of cases requiring combined cathecholamine, group 0.3 were significantly lower than group 0.05 at dobutamine, and group 0.05 were significantly higher than group 0.1 and 0.3 at norepinephrine. CONCLUSIONS: The higher continuous infusion dose of olprinone (0.3 > 0.1 > 0.05 microgram.kg-1.min-1) can diminish the number of cases requiring combined cathecholamine administration during coronary artery bypass grafting.


Assuntos
Ponte Cardiopulmonar , Cardiotônicos/administração & dosagem , Hemodinâmica , Imidazóis/administração & dosagem , Piridonas/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Catecolaminas/administração & dosagem , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...